Difference between setTimeout with and without quotes and parentheses

Question

I am learning JavaScript and I have learned recently about JavaScript timing events. When I learned about setTimeout at W3Schools, I noticed a strange figure which I didn’t run into before. They are using double quotes and then call the function.

Example:

setTimeout("alertMsg()", 3000);

I know that double and single quotes in JavaScript means a string.

Also I saw that I can do the same like that:

setTimeout(alertMsg, 3000);

With the parentheses it’s referring, without the parentheses it’s copied. When I am using the quotes and the parentheses it’s getting crazy.

I will be glad if someone can explain to me the difference between these three ways of using setTimeout:

With the parentheses:

setTimeout("alertMsg()", 3000);

Without the quotes and the parentheses:

setTimeout(alertMsg, 3000);

And the third is only using quotes:

setTimeout("alertMsg", 3000);

---

N.B.: A better source for setTimeout reference would be MDN.

Answer 1

Using setInterval or setTimeout

You should pass a reference to a function as the first argument for setTimeout or setInterval. This reference may be in the form of:

• An anonymous function

  setTimeout(function(){/* Look mah! No name! */},2000);
  

• A name of an existing function

  function foo(){...}
  
  setTimeout(foo, 2000);
  

• A variable that points to an existing function

  var foo = function(){...};
  
  setTimeout(foo, 2000);
  

  _{Do note that I set "variable in a function" separately from "function name". It's not apparent that variables and function names occupy the same namespace and can clobber each other.}

Passing arguments

To call a function and pass parameters, you can call the function inside the callback assigned to the timer:

setTimeout(function(){
  foo(arg1, arg2, ...argN);
}, 1000);

There is another method to pass in arguments into the handler, however it's not cross-browser compatible.

setTimeout(foo, 2000, arg1, arg2, ...argN);

Callback context

By default, the context of the callback (the value of this inside the function called by the timer) when executed is the global object window. Should you want to change it, use bind.

setTimeout(function(){
  this === YOUR_CONTEXT; // true
}.bind(YOUR_CONTEXT), 2000);

Security

Although it's possible, you should not pass a string to setTimeout or setInterval. Passing a string makes setTimeout() or setInterval() use a functionality similar to eval() that executes strings as scripts, making arbitrary and potentially harmful script execution possible.

Answer 2

i think the setTimeout function that you write is not being run. if you use jquery, you can make it run correctly by doing this :

    function alertMsg() {
      //your func
    }

    $(document).ready(function() {
       setTimeout(alertMsg,3000); 
       // the function you called by setTimeout must not be a string.
    });

Answer 3

Totally agree with Joseph.

Here is a fiddle to test this: http://jsfiddle.net/nicocube/63s2s/

In the context of the fiddle, the string argument do not work, in my opinion because the function is not defined in the global scope.

Answer 4

What happens in reality in case you pass string as a first parameter of function

setTimeout('string',number)

is value of first param got evaluated when it is time to run (after numberof miliseconds passed). Basically it is equal to

setTimeout(eval('string'), number)

This is

an alternative syntax that allows you to include a string instead of a function, which is compiled and executed when the timer expires. This syntax is not recommended for the same reasons that make using eval() a security risk.

So samples which you refer are not good samples, and may be given in different context or just simple typo.

If you invoke like this setTimeout(something, number), first parameter is not string, but pointer to a something called something. And again if something is string - then it will be evaluated. But if it is function, then function will be executed. jsbin sample

Answer 5

    ##If i want to wait for some response from server or any action we use setTimeOut.

    functionOne =function(){
    console.info("First");

    setTimeout(()=>{
    console.info("After timeOut 1");
    },5000);
    console.info("only setTimeOut() inside code waiting..");
    }

    functionTwo =function(){
    console.info("second");
    }
    functionOne();
    functionTwo();

## So here console.info("After timeOut 1"); will be executed after time elapsed.
Output:
******************************************************************************* 
First
only setTimeOut() inside code waiting..
second
undefined
After timeOut 1  // executed after time elapsed.

Answer 6

For what it's worth, I found another quirk about the setTimeout function:

setTimeout(myFunction(),10000);    // executes immediately!!
setTimeout('myFunction()',10000);  // executes in 10 seconds

Answer 7

With the parentheses:

setTimeout("alertMsg()", 3000); // It work, here it treat as a function

Without the quotes and the parentheses:

setTimeout(alertMsg, 3000); // It also work, here it treat as a function

And the third is only using quotes:

setTimeout("alertMsg", 3000); // It not work, here it treat as a string

function alertMsg1() {
        alert("message 1");
    }
    function alertMsg2() {
        alert("message 2");
    }
    function alertMsg3() {
        alert("message 3");
    }
    function alertMsg4() {
        alert("message 4");
    }

    // this work after 2 second
    setTimeout(alertMsg1, 2000);

    // This work immediately
    setTimeout(alertMsg2(), 4000);

    // this fail
    setTimeout('alertMsg3', 6000);

    // this work after 8second
    setTimeout('alertMsg4()', 8000);

In the above example first alertMsg2() function call immediately (we give the time out 4S but it don't bother) after that alertMsg1() (A time wait of 2 Second) then alertMsg4() (A time wait of 8 Second) but the alertMsg3() is not working because we place it within the quotes without parties so it is treated as a string.