51

What are the ? and : operators in PHP?

For example:

(($request_type == 'SSL') ? HTTPS_SERVER : HTTP_SERVER)
Peter Mortensen
  • 30,738
  • 21
  • 105
  • 131
seb
  • 521
  • 1
  • 4
  • 4

10 Answers10

84

This is the conditional operator.

$x ? $y : $z

means "if $x is true, then use $y; otherwise use $z".

It also has a short form.

$x ?: $z

means "if $x is true, then use $x; otherwise use $z".

People will tell you that ?: is "the ternary operator". This is wrong. ?: is a ternary operator, which means that it has three operands. People wind up thinking its name is "the ternary operator" because it's often the only ternary operator a given language has.

chaos
  • 122,029
  • 33
  • 303
  • 309
  • 1
    If possible it should be avoided other than for the most simple cases. IMHO it makes the old diffiuclt to read. – HeretoLearn Jul 03 '09 at 17:37
  • 7
    I don't disagree, but I sometimes feel that people take their conditional operator hate too far. I would say that ?: should be used whenever it makes the code cleaner and clearer -- and that we can assume, for purposes of "clearer", that the person reading the code does readily understand what ?: does. – chaos Jul 03 '09 at 17:43
  • 5
    I'm fond of the conditional operator for return statements (where a condition is necessary, obviously.) One return keyword, two conditions. :) – Yohnny Jul 03 '09 at 17:55
  • 4
    Of course, in good languages, "if, then, else" is an expression. ;) – Deniz Dogan Jul 03 '09 at 18:15
  • 5
    Personally i love condition expressions and find them very easy to read. Once you understand that they're an 'IF' shortcut, you wonder what was so hard about them. But each to his own i guess. :o) – Gary Willoughby Jul 18 '09 at 17:05
  • 3
    I literally thought it was called the ternary operator. Thanks for the clarification. – Tom Jul 21 '09 at 20:41
  • 2
    From the php docs http://php.net/manual/en/migration53.new-features.php: The ternary operator now has a shorthand form: ?: Just because a word describes a thing doesn't mean it can't also be the name for it. – grossvogel Jul 24 '10 at 22:43
  • 6
    @grossvogel: No, but if that word actually or potentially describes *an infinite number of other things*, then yes, that does mean it can't be the name for it. And the fact that you point out makes Zend *even stupider*, since now they're saying that "the ternary operator", as they moronically call it, has a form *WHERE IT IS A BINARY OPERATOR*. – chaos Jul 25 '10 at 15:26
  • 3
    @chaos: We learn this from our teachers, in schools or on the job. We then replicate it. It is good to correct us, as we are victims of maleducation. – Iiridayn Sep 07 '10 at 16:32
  • @chaos: A nice -1 to you, for calling other people stupid and for your blatant denial against linguistic evolution. Calling the `?:` operator "ternary operator" is well established; the term is by far more common than "conditional operator". – NikiC May 05 '11 at 18:17
  • 2
    @nikic: If a hundred thousand people jump off a bridge, they're still all stupid. Words have actual meanings, including the words "ternary" and "operator", and idiots repeating what they don't understand in a lemming-like fashion does not linguistic evolution make. – chaos May 05 '11 at 18:55
  • 1
    Extra +1 for debunking "ternary operator". It makes my skin crawl. – Lightness Races in Orbit Jan 05 '12 at 18:04
  • 2
    I have no problem calling it "**the** ternary operator". It's the only three-operand operator I've ever encountered in my career. Enlighten us if you can name an instance of a programming language with any other three-operand operator. On the flip side of the coin, I have a problem with calling it "**the** conditional operator", implying it's the only operator that can be used as a condition. Yet we have operators like `AND` and `OR` which check if the left operand is true, making them conditional operators. It goes by both, and often cited together because they are one and the same. – Ultimater Nov 24 '17 at 06:27
33

I'm going to write a little bit on ternaries, what they are, how to use them, when and why to use them and when not to use them.

What is a ternary operator?

A ternary ? : is shorthand for if and else. That's basically it. See "Ternary Operators" half way down this page for more of an official explanation.

As of PHP 5.3:

Since PHP 5.3, it is possible to leave out the middle part of the ternary operator. Expression expr1 ?: expr3 returns expr1 if expr1 evaluates to TRUE, and expr3 otherwise.

As of PHP 7.0

PHP 7 has new Null Coalesce Operator. This is the same as a ternary but is also called an "isset ternary". This also allows a set of chained ternaries that remove the need for isset() checks.

In PHP 5, if you wanted to use a ternary with a potentially non-existent variable then you would have to perform an isset() at the beginning of the ternary statement:

$result = isset($nonExistentVariable) ? $nonExistentVariable : ‘default’;

In PHP 7, you can now do this instead:

$result = $nonExistentVariable ?? ‘default’;

The Null Coalesce Operator does not work with an empty string, however, so bear that in mind. The great thing about this is you can also chain the operators for multiple checks for multiple variables, providing a sort of backup depending on whether or not each variable in the chain exists:

$user = $userImpersonatingAnotherUser ?? $loggedInUser ?? “Guest”;

In PHP, with systems where a user can login, it is not uncommon for an administrator to be able to impersonate another user for testing purposes. With the above example, if the user is not impersonating another user, and also a logged in user does not exist, then the user will be a guest user instead. Read on more if you don't understand this yet to see what ternaries are and how they are used, and then come back to this bit to see how the new PHP

How are ternaries used?

Here's how a normal if statement looks:

if (isset($_POST['hello']))
{
    $var = 'exists';
}
else
{
    $var = 'error';
}

Let's shorten that down into a ternary.

$var = isset($_POST['hello']) ? 'exists' : 'error';
                 ^            ^     ^    ^     |
                 |           then   |   else   |
                 |                  |          |
          if post isset         $var=this   $var=this

Much shorter, but maybe harder to read. Not only are they used for setting variables like $var in the previous example, but you can also do this with echo, and to check if a variable is false or not:

$isWinner = false;

// Outputs 'you lose'
echo ($isWinner) ? 'You win!' : 'You lose';

// Same goes for return
return ($isWinner) ? 'You win!' : 'You lose';

Why do people use them?

I think ternaries are sexy. Some developers like to show off, but sometimes ternaries just look nice in your code, especially when combined with other features like PHP 5.4's latest short echos.

<?php 
    $array = array(0 => 'orange', 1 => 'multicoloured'); 
?>

<div>
    <?php foreach ($array as $key => $value) { ?>
        <span><?=($value==='multicoloured')?'nonsense':'pointless'?></span>
    <?php } ?>
</div>

<!-- Outputs:
    <span>
        pointless
    </span>
    <span>
        nonsense
    </span> 
-->

Going off-topic slightly, when you're in a 'view/template' (if you're seperating your concerns through the MVC paradigm), you want as little server-side logic in there as possible. So, using ternaries and other short-hand code is sometimes the best way forward. By "other short-hand code", I mean:

if ($isWinner) :
    // Show something cool
endif;

Note, I personally do not like this kind of shorthand if / endif nonsense

How fast is the ternary operator?

People LIKE micro-optimisations. They just do. So for some, it's important to know how much faster things like ternaries are when compared with normal if / else statements.

Reading this post, the differences are about 0.5ms. That's a lot!

Oh wait, no it's not. It's only a lot if you're doing thousands upon thousands of them in a row, repeatedly. Which you won't be. So don't worry about speed optimisation at all, it's absolutely pointless here.

When not to use ternaries

Your code should be:

  • Easy to read
  • Easy to understand
  • Easy to modify

Obviously this is subject to the persons intelligence and coding knowledge / general level of understanding on such concepts when coming to look at your code. A single simple ternary like the previous examples are okay, something like the following, however, is not what you should be doing:

echo ($colour === 'red') ? "Omg we're going to die" :
     ($colour === 'blue' ? "Ah sunshine and daisies" :
     ($colour === 'green' ? "Trees are green"
     : "The bloody colour is orange, isn't it? That was pointless."));

That was pointless for three reasons:

  • Ridiculously long ternary embedding
  • Could've just used a switch statement
  • It was orange in the first place

Conclusion

Ternaries really are simple and nothing to get too worked up about. Don't consider any speed improvements, it really won't make a difference. Use them when they are simple and look nice, and always make sure your code will be readable by others in the future. If that means no ternaries, then don't use ternaries.

Community
  • 1
  • 1
Jimbo
  • 25,790
  • 15
  • 86
  • 131
  • `if/else` statements can in some situations be a lot faster. From the referenced blog post you can read: "On my laptop, snippet 1 [ternary] takes more than two seconds, whereas snippet 2 [if/else] takes about 0.05ms. That's a big difference! But if the variable to test does not host many data, the speed is almost the same." – m13r Oct 25 '17 at 11:30
  • @m13r Did you miss: "It's only a lot if you're doing thousands upon thousands of them in a row, repeatedly."? – Jimbo Oct 25 '17 at 12:13
  • 1
    The difference between ternary and if/else (with huge arrays) is 2 seconds and not 0.5 ms. This was benchmarked using only 100 iterations not thousands. This could be one more argument to use if/else instead of ternary... – m13r Oct 25 '17 at 12:23
  • Mine wasn't exactly a scientific explanation, it was rather generic. If you'd like to add a few more numbers and change the non-specific parts, feel free to edit it and I'll accept the edit. – Jimbo Oct 25 '17 at 12:33
13

It's called a ternary operator. If the first expression evaluates to true, HTTPS_SERVER is used, else HTTP_SERVER is chosen.

It's basically a shorthand if statement, and the above code could also be rewritten as follows:

if ($request_type == 'SSL') {
   HTTPS_SERVER;
}
else {
   HTTP_SERVER;
}
Peter Mortensen
  • 30,738
  • 21
  • 105
  • 131
John T
  • 23,735
  • 11
  • 56
  • 82
7

This is sometimes known as the ternary conditional operator. Ternary means that it has three arguments, as x ? y : z. Basically, it checks if x is true; if it is, then put y instead of this operation, otherwise z.

$hello = $something ? "Yes, it's true" : "No, it's false";
chaos
  • 122,029
  • 33
  • 303
  • 309
Deniz Dogan
  • 25,711
  • 35
  • 110
  • 162
6

Conditional operator ? : is an operator which is used to check a condition and select a value depending on the value of the condition. It is expressed in the following form:

variable = condition ? expression1 : expression2;

It works as follows...

  1. Firstly, condition is evaluated.
  2. If the condition is true, then expression1 is evalauated. And the value of expression1 is assigned to the variable.
  3. If the condition is false, then expression2 is evaluated. And the value of expression2 is assigned to the variable.

For example:

x = (a>b) ? 5 : 9

In this, for x, firstly the condition (a>b) is evaluated. If this condition becomes true, then x will become the value 5 (ie, x=5). But if the condition (a>b) becomes false, then x will attain the value 9 (ie, x=9).

Ternary Operator

Sometimes conditional operator ? : is also called a ternary operator. This is so because it involves three operands. For example:

x ? y : z

Here, x,y and z are the three operands. If condition x is true, then value y is assigned otherwise value z is assigned.

3

This is a short way of writing if sentences. It is also used in other languages like Java, JavaScript and others.

Your code,

$protocol = $request_type == 'SSL' ? HTTPS_SERVER : HTTP_SERVER;

can be written like this:

if ($request_type == 'SSL')
    $protocol = HTTPS_SERVER;
else
    $protocol = HTTP_SERVER;
Peter Mortensen
  • 30,738
  • 21
  • 105
  • 131
xpepermint
  • 35,055
  • 30
  • 109
  • 163
0

That is a one line if statement:

condition ? true : false

Translated to an ordinary if statement in your case, that would be:

if($request_type == 'SSL') HTTPS_SERVER;
else HTTP_SERVER;
chaos
  • 122,029
  • 33
  • 303
  • 309
Yngve Sneen Lindal
  • 1,013
  • 3
  • 12
  • 24
0

That's basically a fancy way of writing an if-else statement. Some say it's easier to read, some say not.

Ternary operator at Wikipedia

Peter Mortensen
  • 30,738
  • 21
  • 105
  • 131
Daniel Magnusson
  • 9,541
  • 2
  • 38
  • 43
0

This works like an if statement it's very simple and easy once you get used to it. (conditions_expressions) ? what_to_do_if_true : what_to_do_if_false.

Amin
  • 9
  • 5
  • Your answer is not really adding anything new. Almost all other answers covered this back in 2009! – Scratte Apr 28 '20 at 00:21
-1

As John T says, it is called a ternary operator and is essentially a shorthand version of an if /else statement. Your example, as a full if / else statement, would read;

if($request_type == 'SSL')
{
    HTTPS_SERVER;
}
else
{
    HTTP_SERVER;
}
Mathew
  • 8,203
  • 6
  • 37
  • 59
  • 1
    Right, but the entire if-else block would have to evaluate to something in order for it to be equivalent to the operator. But since the OP discards the value... I guess this code is okay? – poundifdef Jul 03 '09 at 17:40
  • Not sure what you mean. The only equivalence that matters here is functional equivalence, no? – Mathew Jul 04 '09 at 08:10
  • That doesn't make sense. `poundifdef` is saying that this if statement is not completely ("functionally" or any other kind) equivalent to the ternary operator because the whole if/else statement doesn't evaluate to something. See `xpepermint`'s answer below. – ReinstateMonica3167040 Oct 15 '18 at 00:32
  • Sure, the conditional operator evaluates to something, it would be useless if not. But the OP's example contains no assignment at all, so my example is exactly equivalent (if not the most useful way to answer the question, granted) – Mathew Jan 04 '19 at 11:30