This came up in Hidden features of Python, but I can't see good documentation or examples that explain how the feature works.
4 Answers
The ellipsis is used in numpy to slice higher-dimensional data structures.
It's designed to mean at this point, insert as many full slices (:
) to extend the multi-dimensional slice to all dimensions.
Example:
>>> from numpy import arange
>>> a = arange(16).reshape(2,2,2,2)
Now, you have a 4-dimensional matrix of order 2x2x2x2. To select all first elements in the 4th dimension, you can use the ellipsis notation
>>> a[..., 0].flatten()
array([ 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14])
which is equivalent to
>>> a[:,:,:,0].flatten()
array([ 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14])
In your own implementations, you're free to ignore the contract mentioned above and use it for whatever you see fit.

- 11,146
- 3
- 53
- 61

- 83,780
- 21
- 91
- 98
-
1Maybe I am wrong but isn't it that `a[:,:,:,0]` will return a copy and `a[...,0]` will return the "view" and not the copy? I tried running `id()` against both the versions and for a 3-dim array: ```a[:,:,:, 0], a[:,:,:, 1], a[:,:,:, 2] ``` all have different ids whereas: ```a[..., 0], a[..., 1], a[..., 2] ``` all have same ids. – mohitsharma44 Oct 05 '16 at 18:59
-
1@mohitsharma44 not on my machine ;) `id()` returns the same value for both. Also checking with [`__array_interface__['data']`](https://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/arrays.interface.html) shows the same memory address. – BoltzmannBrain Mar 30 '17 at 17:27
-
1I find we can use `a[indexes, ...]` while a is a 1-dimenstional array even! – acgtyrant May 22 '17 at 08:14
-
4what is a 4 dimensional matrix? It makes sense to call it as 4 dimensional array but not as matrix., IMO. – kmario23 Jan 20 '18 at 02:39
-
5Ellipses are also useful for zero-dimensional data structures. They are the only way I know of to write into scalar numpy.ndarrays, e.g.: my_scalar = np.asarray(3); my_scalar[...] = 5. If you do my_scalar[:] = 5, you'll rightfully get an error, because there's no dimension 0 for the : to iterate over. – SuperElectric Feb 13 '18 at 11:21
-
2@SuperElectric You can also use my_scalar.itemset(scalarvalue). Of course, my_scalar[...]=scalar_value is shorter, but you said in the above comment, that it is the only way you know. Just giving an alternative. – kamathln Mar 02 '18 at 05:03
Ellipsis
, or ...
is not a hidden feature, it's just a constant. It's quite different to, say, javascript ES6 where it's a part of the language syntax. No builtin class or Python language constuct makes use of it.
So the syntax for it depends entirely on you, or someone else, having written code to understand it.
Numpy uses it, as stated in the documentation. Some examples here.
In your own class, you'd use it like this:
>>> class TestEllipsis(object):
... def __getitem__(self, item):
... if item is Ellipsis:
... return "Returning all items"
... else:
... return "return %r items" % item
...
>>> x = TestEllipsis()
>>> print x[2]
return 2 items
>>> print x[...]
Returning all items
Of course, there is the python documentation, and language reference. But those aren't very helpful.

- 21,988
- 13
- 81
- 109

- 217,122
- 57
- 293
- 297
-
8looks quite broken since the "propper" way to say all items is >>> x[:] >>> x[:, 1:2] – May 08 '09 at 12:53
-
37
-
9
This is another use for Ellipsis, which has nothing to do with slices: I often use it in intra-thread communication with queues, as a mark that signals "Done"; it's there, it's an object, it's a singleton, and its name means "lack of", and it's not the overused None (which could be put in a queue as part of normal data flow). YMMV.

- 115,751
- 26
- 228
- 437

- 92,761
- 29
- 141
- 204
-
15Mightn't it be clearer to just say: "Done = object()" somewhere and just use that? – Brandon Rhodes Apr 21 '09 at 14:05
-
13Not necessarily - it requires you to actually _say_ Done=object() somewhere. Sentinel values aren't necessarily a bad thing -- and using otherwise nearly-useless Python singletons as sentinels isn't so horrible IMO (Ellipsis and () are the ones I've used where None would be confusing). – Rick Copeland Jun 22 '09 at 15:51
-
7Regarding Done = object(), I think using Ellipsis is better, especially if you're using it for communication with queues. If you go from intra-thread to intra-process communication, id(Done) will not be the same in the other process, and there is nothing to distinguish one object from another. The id of Ellipsis won't be the same either, but at least the type will be the same - this is the point of a singleton. – Tristan Reid Jan 18 '13 at 18:42
-
The question says "How do you use ellipsis" but I believe you took this the wrong way. It has many interpretations. But I think the correct on is: "How is Ellipsis used?" ie "What steps should I take to make use of Ellipsis in my own code.". – Frames Catherine White Dec 23 '14 at 14:15
As stated in other answers, it can be used for creating slices.
Useful when you do not want to write many full slices notations (:
), or when you are just not sure on what is dimensionality of the array being manipulated.
What I thought important to highlight, and that was missing on the other answers, is that it can be used even when there is no more dimensions to be filled.
Example:
>>> from numpy import arange
>>> a = arange(4).reshape(2,2)
This will result in error:
>>> a[:,0,:]
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
IndexError: too many indices for array
This will work:
a[...,0,:]
array([0, 1])

- 190
- 1
- 7