The default lower-alpha list type for ordered list uses a dot '.'. Is there a way to use a right parenthesis instead like a)... b) ..etc?
-
3Maybe one of the answer can be picked as correct ?... – Takit Isy Apr 01 '18 at 11:16
7 Answers
Here's a neat solution. (Honestly I surprised myself with this.) CSS has something called counters, where you can set, for example, automatic chapter numbers on each heading. A bit of modification gives you the below; You'll need to sort out padding etc yourself.
ol {
counter-reset: list;
}
ol > li {
list-style: none;
}
ol > li:before {
content: counter(list, lower-alpha) ") ";
counter-increment: list;
}
<span>custom list style type (v1):</span>
<ol>
<li>Number 1</li>
<li>Number 2</li>
<li>Number 3</li>
<li>Number 4</li>
<li>Number 5</li>
<li>Number 6</li>
</ol>
Works in all modern browsers and IE9+ (and possibly IE8 but may be buggy).
Update: I added child selector to prevent nested lists picking up the parent style. trejder also beings up a good point in the comments that the list item alignment is also messed up. An article on 456bereastreet has a good solution which involves absolutely positioning the counter.
ol {
counter-reset: list;
}
ol > li {
list-style: none;
position: relative;
}
ol > li:before {
counter-increment: list;
content: counter(list, lower-alpha) ") ";
position: absolute;
left: -1.4em;
}
<span>custom list style type (v2):</span>
<ol>
<li>Number 1</li>
<li>Number 2</li>
<li>Number 3</li>
<li>Number 4</li>
<li>Number 5</li>
<li>Number 6</li>
</ol>
Here is a jsFiddle showing the result, including nested lists.

- 610
- 11
- 15

- 70,219
- 68
- 205
- 290
-
1You are right, this doesn't work in IE6. But good news it works on Firefox 3.5.3. – mouviciel Oct 28 '09 at 11:27
-
1Actually it would be better if: ol { counter-reset: list; } The original one would not work when there are multiple ols. – Feng Jiang Feb 16 '12 at 06:08
-
1FYI, to get a numbered list instead of alphabetical, just remove the ```, lower-alpha```. So the ```content``` value would be ```counter(list) ") ";``` – Trevan Hetzel Apr 09 '13 at 17:06
-
1Let me only add, that this isn't 100% real numbering. You can see the difference on multi-line items. In _normal_ lists (using standard bullets or numbers) each line has the same indent, so bullet or number looks like standing before block of text. With above solution, each _next_ line starts below numbering and isn't slightly inset. Which doesn't change the fact, that this is really neat solution! :> – trejder Jan 30 '14 at 14:19
-
Plus: This fails completely on multi-level lists (my example [at jsFiddle](http://jsfiddle.net/trejder/nKtE6/)). – trejder Jan 30 '14 at 14:36
-
Since this involves a pseudo-element, can I assume that this can't be done with inline CSS in a ` – Lori Feb 27 '14 at 06:10
-
@user1269964 no, but if you're doing that you may as well just write a) b) etc in the document itself – DisgruntledGoat Feb 27 '14 at 13:29
-
I think `counter-increment: list;` should be added to `ol > li`, not `ol > li:before` (Chrome) – Blazemonger May 15 '14 at 15:47
-
Nice. Thank you! I'd prefer to add `list-style-type: none;` to the `ol` specifications instead of having `list-style: none;` in the `li` specs. – Andrew Mar 22 '17 at 01:55
-
1having tested it, I realise that this wouldn't respect `start` attribute of the `ol` element – Eakan Gopalakrishnan Sep 28 '18 at 10:32
-
FYI it should be `counter-reset: list-item list;`. Firefox implements the default `list-item` counter using the UA stylesheet, so doing `counter-reset: list-item list;` removes the default reset and breaks any non-customized lists. More on that: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4244 – Michał Łazowik Oct 17 '19 at 12:44
-
This breaks apart when the list items are empty (the all get stacked in the same place). A fix for this would be to add an `:after` pseudo element to `li` with content `\a0` (nbsp) – Jonas Kohl Jun 05 '20 at 07:33
More than 10 years after the original question the standard (and, to some extent, implementations) seem to have caught up.
CSS now provides ::marker
pseudoclass which can be used to achieve custom list markers: MDN.
Using ::marker
automatically indents li
's content without any hacks. According to MDN, as of Feb 2021 it's supported in Firefox, Chrome and Edge, and partially (not for this use case) in Safari.
.container {
width: 400px;
}
ol.custom-marker {
counter-reset: list;
}
ol.custom-marker > li {
list-style: none;
counter-increment: list;
}
ol.custom-marker.parens-after.decimal > li::marker {
content: counter(list) ")\a0";
}
ol.custom-marker.parens-around.lower-roman > li::marker {
content: "(" counter(list, lower-roman) ")\a0";
}
<div class='container'>
<ol class='custom-marker parens-after decimal'>
<li>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Eu sem integer vitae justo eget magna fermentum. Quis varius quam quisque id diam.</li>
<li>Another list here
<ol class='custom-marker parens-around lower-roman'>
<li>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Eu sem integer vitae justo eget magna fermentum. Quis varius quam quisque id diam.</li>
<li>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Eu sem integer vitae justo eget magna fermentum. Quis varius quam quisque id diam.</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Eu sem integer vitae justo eget magna fermentum. Quis varius quam quisque id diam.</li>
</ol>
</div>
\a0
in content
is
, since ::marker
doesn't support margins or padding.

- 1,043
- 11
- 19
-
1This is the most practical answer. List markers are supposed to align to the right and this method covered it correctly. – Pouyan Nov 24 '21 at 11:51
building off of DisgruntledGoat's answer, I expanded it to support sub lists & styles as I needed. Sharing it here in case it helps someone.
https://jsfiddle.net/0a8992b9/ outputs:
(i)first roman
(a)first alpha
(b)second alpha
(c)third alpha
(d)fourth alpha
(ii)second roman
(iii)third roman
(a)first alpha
(b)second alpha

- 1,396
- 16
- 29
-
1+1 You did a reset for alpha. that helped me a lot. Thanks a lot. If someone doesn't have the alpha class, he can use ol[style*="list-style-type: lower-alpha;"] – SK. Mar 29 '17 at 15:30
-
is there a way to have this while also having the text remain to the right of the letter used in the place of a bullet point? i.e. not having the text wrap to under the letter (e.g. a) ) but rather wrap back to the point where the text begins for a particular letter point, as the regular
- would look
– sabliao Aug 17 '17 at 23:26 -
@sabliao add a negative value for `text-indent` to the `li` level – Tyler James Young Jun 05 '19 at 16:51
Adding this to the CSS gave some interesting results. It was close, but no cigar.
li:before {
display: inline-block;
width: 1em;
position: relative;
left: -0.5em;
content: ')'
}
----- Edited to include solution from Iazel, in the comments -----
I've perfected your solution:
li {
position: relative;
}
li:before {
display: inline-block;
width: 7px;
position: absolute;
left: -12px;
content: ')';
background-color: #FFF;
text-align: center;
}
The background and position: absolute
did the trick!

- 33,529
- 30
- 159
- 234

- 1,047
- 11
- 16
-
I've perfected your solution: `li { position: relative; } li:before { display: inline-block; width: 7px; position: absolute; left: -12px; content: ')'; background-color: #FFF; text-align: center; }` The background and position: absolute did the trick! :) – Iazel Jul 12 '13 at 11:36
In Firefox and newer versions of Chrome/Edge/Chromium, you can define your own counter style with @counter-style
and use the prefix
and suffix
properties to define what comes before/after the counter. According to MDN, this still isn't supported in Safari (as of Nov 2022).
@counter-style my-new-list-style {
system: extends lower-alpha;
suffix: ') ';
}
.container ol {
list-style: my-new-list-style;
}
<div class="container">
<ol>
<li>One.</li>
<li>Two!</li>
<li>Three?</li>
<li>Four...</li>
</ol>
</div>

- 41
- 3
This seems to work:
ol {
counter-reset: list;
margin: 0;
}
ol > li {
list-style: none;
position: relative;
}
ol > li:before {
counter-increment: list;
content: counter(list, lower-alpha) ") ";
position: absolute;
left: -1.4em;
}

- 1,141
- 8
- 16
This works for me in IE7, FF3.6, Opera 9.64 and Chrome 6.0.4:
<ol start="a" type="a" style="font-weight: normal;">
<li><span style="inline-block;margin-left: -9px !important; margin-left: -15px;">) </span> content for line number one;</li>
<li><span style="inline-block;margin-left: -9px !important; margin-left: -15px;">) </span> content for line number two;</li>
<li><span style="inline-block;margin-left: -9px !important; margin-left: -15px;">) </span> content for line number three;</li>
<li><span style="inline-block;margin-left: -9px !important; margin-left: -15px;">) </span> content for line number four;</li>
<li><span style="inline-block;margin-left: -9px !important; margin-left: -15px;">) </span> content for line number five;</li>
<li><span style="inline-block;margin-left: -9px !important; margin-left: -15px;">) </span> content for line number six;</li>
</ol>
this is inline because it is coded for an email, but the main point is that the span acts as a content block and pulls the paren into negative left territory so it lines up with the list numbers. the two margins are to compensate for IE7 and FF differences
hope this helps.
-
1
-
This is a hack because it's dependent on the font size when trying to place the paren next to the auto-generated "a", "b", etc char. If you were going to do something like this, you should use list-style-type:none and take over rendering the entire "a)" yourself rather than trying to just render the paren. – Charles Kendrick May 15 '13 at 22:00