Using the newer ASP.NET Web API, in Chrome I am seeing XML - how can I change it to request JSON so I can view it in the browser? I do believe it is just part of the request headers, am I correct in that?
-
8There is a discussion here to make returning JSON only the default behavior: https://github.com/aspnet/Mvc/issues/1765 – Natan Jan 06 '15 at 17:43
29 Answers
Note: Read the comments of this answer, it can produce a XSS Vulnerability if you are using the default error handing of WebAPI
I just add the following in App_Start / WebApiConfig.cs
class in my MVC Web API project.
config.Formatters.JsonFormatter.SupportedMediaTypes
.Add(new MediaTypeHeaderValue("text/html") );
That makes sure you get JSON on most queries, but you can get XML
when you send text/xml
.
If you need to have the response Content-Type
as application/json
please check Todd's answer below.
NameSpace
is using System.Net.Http.Headers
.

- 4,262
- 5
- 34
- 71

- 19,991
- 2
- 26
- 19
-
120This is a surprisingly overlooked answer, and although the original question wasn't totally clear, this directly makes JSON the default response for a web browser (which sends Accept: text/html). Good job. – gregmac Jan 15 '13 at 01:44
-
1I like this much better than requiring a json=true query parameter. – tponthieux Aug 15 '13 at 01:34
-
17+1 Far and away the best answer. I imagine there are a ton of ppl who opt to completely remove XML just because they don't see JSON in the browser. – Derek Hunziker Nov 16 '13 at 09:51
-
Well done. [My answer](http://stackoverflow.com/a/20556625/62600) expands on this a bit by accepting text/html but returning application/json, in case you happen to use a Chrome extension that expects it for formatting. – Todd Menier Dec 12 '13 at 23:54
-
@Felipe: Did you add your line above into the Global.asax? Do you mean: `GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.Formatters.JsonFormatter.SupportedMediaTypes.Add(new MediaTypeHeaderValue("text/html"));`? – surfmuggle Dec 13 '13 at 13:21
-
2I haven't worked with WebAPI for a while but i'm pretty sure that's it. – Felipe Leusin Dec 13 '13 at 22:11
-
4I found when I did this that data provided by a third party with HTML break tags in it ended up with carriage returns. The JSON was then invalid. Better to use the accepted answer if this affects you. – Stonetip Mar 14 '14 at 15:03
-
25Note that the response's `Content-Type` header will still be `text/html`. – Mrchief May 02 '14 at 17:29
-
2why text/html? Isn't the type for json: application/json ? When I used the solution above and put application/json instead of text/html, I got the response in XML. Isn't this counter intuitive? application/json should have worked. What is the reasoning for this? – user20358 Jul 02 '14 at 08:45
-
84This is horrible. The response content type header should be application/json. This "solution" makes it text/html. – Northstrider Jul 10 '14 at 21:01
-
This was the solution to display on chrome. While not perfect it fits, in case you need the Content-Type as application/json you can check Todd's answer. – Felipe Leusin Jul 11 '14 at 14:40
-
2Note that if the _request_ "Accept" header field is "application/json" (ie set in an ajax GET request), it should return json back. Mine does this but displays xml if you open the url in chrome (where request accept is not set to json). – Curtis Yallop May 20 '15 at 22:02
-
In my case not configuration was needed json serialization was in place by default. Based on the content negotiation rules if there is not agreement the content will be converted into json. – Wilson Jul 16 '15 at 17:38
-
4In case you want to lock down to json only, I suggest you clear all formaters and enable Json only. `GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.Formatters.Clear();` `GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.Formatters.Add(new JsonMediaTypeFormatter());` – Eugene May 30 '16 at 12:55
-
I'm annoyed that Stack Overflow doesn't allow me to take back my upvote because this is not what I'm looking for. Cameln, probably because people jump the gun thinking this solution is correct. Why is MS not setting this up properly with JSON by default? I've done this through a Certified Microsoft class and will I'll try to locate the proper solution. – BBi7 Jul 16 '16 at 03:31
-
-
Only 40 people noticed that there's a way better answer. (via @meffect just remap the response type instead of setting the wrong default.) – BrainSlugs83 May 05 '17 at 16:05
-
1This is a stupid hack, not a good answer. Why would one modify their code for something so simple as setting a request header? If you are so keen on writing code for this rather recommend writing tests. And I guess naspinski and others realized that they can't test POST, PUT, DELETE etc with a plain browser. – user3285954 Nov 30 '17 at 23:06
-
4This answer could potentially expose an XSS vulnerability. WebAPI will include the full URL on a 404 response, and because the content type is text/html, the browser will happily execute any JavaScript included in the query string. – Doug McClean Dec 27 '17 at 23:41
-
For detailed configuration, one can look at reference: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/web-api/overview/formats-and-model-binding/json-and-xml-serialization – JPatel Jan 05 '18 at 07:25
-
4I agree with @meffect, this is a "fine" answer for a development environment, but if you use this solution in a production setting you will open yourself up to XSS attacks. – Jeff Dammeyer Feb 07 '20 at 14:51
-
1Why are so many MS-using devs okay with hacky answers? Your web client would be receiving responses inconsistent with the requested format. When you request text/html you should be receiving HTML. When you request application/json you should be getting back JSON. Sheeesh. – elliotwesoff Mar 12 '20 at 23:33
-
2Like others have pointed out, this causes an XSS vulnerability on the web api 404 page since the URL that causes the 404 is included as content on the 404 error page. DO NOT USE. – ptf Sep 07 '20 at 14:13
If you do this in the WebApiConfig
you will get JSON by default, but it will still allow you to return XML if you pass text/xml
as the request Accept
header.
Note: This removes the support for application/xml
public static class WebApiConfig
{
public static void Register(HttpConfiguration config)
{
config.Routes.MapHttpRoute(
name: "DefaultApi",
routeTemplate: "api/{controller}/{id}",
defaults: new { id = RouteParameter.Optional }
);
var appXmlType = config.Formatters.XmlFormatter.SupportedMediaTypes.FirstOrDefault(t => t.MediaType == "application/xml");
config.Formatters.XmlFormatter.SupportedMediaTypes.Remove(appXmlType);
}
}
If you are not using the MVC project type and therefore did not have this class to begin with, see this answer for details on how to incorporate it.

- 4,262
- 5
- 34
- 71

- 33,720
- 26
- 113
- 165
-
52Just to note, the original behaviour is correct. Chrome requests `application/xml` with a priority of 0.9 and `*/*` with a priority of 0.8. By removing `application/xml` you remove the ability for the Web API to return XML if the client requests that specifically. e.g. if you send "Accept: application/xml" you will *still* receive JSON. – porges Mar 26 '13 at 21:20
-
Based on @Porges's comment, I suggest wrapping the two lines that remove XML support in a #if DEBUG directive. This way in dev you can use Chrome's address bar to test your api and get json by defaut and you will still offer support XML in your prod environment. – Sylvain Mar 29 '13 at 16:38
-
12Is it me, or is the first sentence incorrect? The code appears to totally remove XML, not simply change the default. – NickG Apr 09 '13 at 18:24
-
@NickG: yes and no, it removes application/xml support but you can still use text/xml. (Although text/xml is considered deprecated) – Cohen Jul 03 '13 at 10:09
-
6@NickG: a solution that is overlooked here and IMHO is a much better option (keeping application/xml) is the solution proposed by Felipe Leusin lower on this page. Using config.Formatters.XmlFormatter.SupportedMediaTypes.Add(new MediaTypeHeaderValue("text/html")); – Cohen Jul 03 '13 at 10:10
-
1So, how do we do it via web config so we get json by default and XML if requested? – Kyle Sep 03 '13 at 01:40
-
4@Felipse Leusin's answer below is actually shorter and works better. – Ken Smith Sep 09 '13 at 13:20
Using RequestHeaderMapping works even better, because it also sets the Content-Type = application/json
in the response header, which allows Firefox (with JSONView add-on) to format the response as JSON.
GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.Formatters.JsonFormatter.MediaTypeMappings
.Add(new System.Net.Http.Formatting.RequestHeaderMapping("Accept",
"text/html",
StringComparison.InvariantCultureIgnoreCase,
true,
"application/json"));
-
8This is the most lean and simplest solution and Fiddler also detects the content type being returned as josn. – Steve Johnson Mar 07 '15 at 21:06
-
5
-
12
-
Also a great fix for the jsonformatter extension which breaks without this. – KingOfHypocrites Jul 06 '15 at 15:47
-
for some reason though the jsonp formatter extension breaks though when doing this... https://github.com/WebApiContrib/WebApiContrib.Formatting.Jsonp – KingOfHypocrites Jul 06 '15 at 15:50
-
9Worked for me. I needed to add a **using System.Net.Http.Formatting;** – bbsimonbb Feb 09 '16 at 10:03
-
1Linking for my own convenience: This answer plays nicely with another setup step I usually perform: http://stackoverflow.com/a/28337589/398630. – BrainSlugs83 May 05 '17 at 16:03
-
2And to be clear, this just changes the default. You can always get either JSON or XML simply by including the relevant "Accept" header. – Phileosophos Sep 13 '17 at 16:24
-
It works great for JSON but it does not return properly formatted XML. – user20072008 May 16 '19 at 23:35
-
This works great with the newest version of browsers when using the .NET Framework still. – DMadden51 Jul 21 '20 at 14:48
-
1Works great ! You could add the code below to return indented JSON : `var jsonFormat = config.Formatters.OfType
().First(); jsonFormat.SerializerSettings.Formatting = Newtonsoft.Json.Formatting.Indented;` (need to add using System.Net.Http.Formatting; using Newtonsoft.Json.Serialization;) – Fab Aug 07 '20 at 09:33
I like Felipe Leusin's approach best - make sure browsers get JSON without compromising content negotiation from clients that actually want XML. The only missing piece for me was that the response headers still contained content-type: text/html. Why was that a problem? Because I use the JSON Formatter Chrome extension, which inspects content-type, and I don't get the pretty formatting I'm used to. I fixed that with a simple custom formatter that accepts text/html requests and returns application/json responses:
public class BrowserJsonFormatter : JsonMediaTypeFormatter
{
public BrowserJsonFormatter() {
this.SupportedMediaTypes.Add(new MediaTypeHeaderValue("text/html"));
this.SerializerSettings.Formatting = Formatting.Indented;
}
public override void SetDefaultContentHeaders(Type type, HttpContentHeaders headers, MediaTypeHeaderValue mediaType) {
base.SetDefaultContentHeaders(type, headers, mediaType);
headers.ContentType = new MediaTypeHeaderValue("application/json");
}
}
Register like so:
config.Formatters.Add(new BrowserJsonFormatter());

- 1
- 1

- 37,557
- 17
- 150
- 173
-
24In the constructor add `this.SerializerSettings.Formatting = Formatting.Indented;` if you want it pretty-printed without a browser extension. – Alastair Maw May 15 '14 at 14:48
-
1Perfect. I was having issues with Felipe's solution returning a Content-Type of `text/html` and this fixed it (and made the response correct!) I combined your answer with suhair's answer so that I get JSON sent to the browser by default but have the option of adding "format=xml" or "format=json" to the querystring to select a specific formatter. Thanks! – Nick Jul 01 '14 at 17:49
-
11
-
1@meffect pretty-printing is preferred when viewing in a browser. Clients requesting json via application/json would still have non indented json returned. – Eddie Groves Jul 21 '14 at 06:20
-
9Isn't @dmit77 's [Answer](http://stackoverflow.com/a/26068063/532517) better (more concise) than this one? – H.Wolper Dec 01 '14 at 12:00
-
@AlastairMaw good idea, added your suggestion so pretty-printing works without the browser extension. – Todd Menier Dec 15 '14 at 18:31
-
9@eddiegroves you dont want pretty-print over the wire. You want the server to send the least amount of bits over the wire (ie: no spaces). Then you want the browser to format it nicely, with addons and such. Javascript needs to parse the JSON usually, why make it slower by introducing unnecessary formatting – Northstrider Feb 12 '15 at 20:53
-
2Thanks Todd, best answer: 1) Correct return type, 2) keeps pretty formatting ONLY from a browser AND 3) I don't have to add a new accept type to Firefox and Chrome works also! Sweetness. – Jester Sep 03 '15 at 20:10
-
15For the googlers who are looking for: don't forget to add `using System.Net.Http.Formatting` and `using Newtonsoft.Json` – Berriel Sep 16 '15 at 01:46
-
1To make sure international characters are returned correcty, set the correct charset by adding the line `headers.ContentType.CharSet = "utf-8";` to the bottom of `SetDefaultContentHeaders()` function. – wize Jan 26 '16 at 19:49
-
The solution doesn't work with IE (e.g. still asking to download json file). Any fix for this ? – DonDon Nov 24 '16 at 06:09
MVC4 Quick Tip #3–Removing the XML Formatter from ASP.Net Web API
In Global.asax
add the line:
GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.Formatters.XmlFormatter.SupportedMediaTypes.Clear();
like so:
protected void Application_Start()
{
AreaRegistration.RegisterAllAreas();
RegisterGlobalFilters(GlobalFilters.Filters);
RegisterRoutes(RouteTable.Routes);
BundleTable.Bundles.RegisterTemplateBundles();
GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.Formatters.XmlFormatter.SupportedMediaTypes.Clear();
}

- 300,895
- 165
- 679
- 742

- 4,687
- 1
- 32
- 25
-
9
-
5
-
101I tested it, and you can't. So this is removing XML support.. Ye be warned, dear google people – Thomas Stock Jul 04 '12 at 00:42
-
3If you have a look at my answer below, this will let xml still be returned if you want to but lets the site respond with JSON to the browser – Glenn Slaven Sep 24 '12 at 01:17
-
3@GlennSlaven yeah your answer should be the one marked as the correct one. – radu florescu Oct 14 '12 at 16:46
-
Adding only last line `GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.Formatters.XmlFormatter.SupportedMediaTypes.Clear();` worked for me. I was getting error in all other lines. It is `Web Form Apllication` – shashwat Feb 21 '13 at 15:14
In the WebApiConfig.cs, add to the end of the Register function:
// Remove the XML formatter
config.Formatters.Remove(config.Formatters.XmlFormatter);

- 6,892
- 7
- 57
- 73

- 2,137
- 1
- 17
- 15
-
-
1In MVC5, this can be done by replacing config with GlobalConfiguration.Configuration – Steven Sep 19 '13 at 13:50
-
5For a project that must support JSON only and under no circumstance can be allowed to emit XML this is by far the best option. – Luc C Jul 15 '14 at 12:45
-
1
-
3That's terrible. -- This will always return JSON no matter what, even if the client specifically asks for XML in the Content-Type header. – BrainSlugs83 May 05 '17 at 21:30
-
2Projects that do not test the XML version of the API as thoroughly as their JSON version should opt for this. Objects are serialized differently by the different formatters as per the link that Michael included. For example: XML formatters do not serialize read-only fields, while the JSON formatter does. – cdiggins Nov 05 '20 at 04:42
In the Global.asax I am using the code below. My URI to get JSON is http://www.digantakumar.com/api/values?json=true
protected void Application_Start()
{
AreaRegistration.RegisterAllAreas();
FilterConfig.RegisterGlobalFilters(GlobalFilters.Filters);
RouteConfig.RegisterRoutes(RouteTable.Routes);
BundleConfig.RegisterBundles(BundleTable.Bundles);
GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.Formatters.JsonFormatter.MediaTypeMappings.Add(new QueryStringMapping("json", "true", "application/json"));
}

- 6,892
- 7
- 57
- 73

- 3,637
- 3
- 27
- 29
-
2Great one. What is your method expect a parameter? like http://localhost:61044/api/values/getdate?json=true,date=2012-08-01 – LT.Nolo Sep 05 '12 at 13:04
Have a look at content negotiation in the WebAPI. These (Part 1 & Part 2) wonderfully detailed and thorough blog posts explain how it works.
In short, you are right, and just need to set the Accept
or Content-Type
request headers. Given your Action isn't coded to return a specific format, you can set Accept: application/json
.

- 9,563
- 6
- 45
- 58
-
6
-
1@Spongman, yes you can. But use an extension like REST Client - most browsers have one like it. The direct typing of url in a browser is 1. Too limiting (no control over headers, cannot post data and etc); 2. Incorrect - The browser does not consume the web api as it is intended to be consumed - you cannot rely on it testing it properly. So, again, a good REST client add-on would fix that. – Ivaylo Slavov Apr 25 '14 at 21:37
As the question is Chrome-specific, you can get the Postman extension which allows you to set the request content type.

- 64,770
- 52
- 221
- 239
-
In Firefox, simply go to about:config, search for accept.default and change the content of the `network.http.accept.default` configuration to `text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/json;q=0.9,application/xml;q=0.8,*/*;q=0.7`. – Bjartur Thorlacius Jun 06 '18 at 10:48
-
Or better yet, just `text/html,application/xhtml+xml;q=1.0,*/*;q=0.7` to avoid buggy hosts such as Bitbucket from accidentally serving your browser JSON in lieu of HTML. – Bjartur Thorlacius Jun 06 '18 at 11:01
-
The URL is dead. A new one is https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/postman/fhbjgbiflinjbdggehcddcbncdddomop?hl=en. – Falcon Momot Jul 02 '18 at 04:34
This code makes json my default and allows me to use the XML format as well. I'll just append the xml=true
.
GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.Formatters.XmlFormatter.MediaTypeMappings.Add(new QueryStringMapping("xml", "true", "application/xml"));
GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.Formatters.JsonFormatter.SupportedMediaTypes.Add(new MediaTypeHeaderValue("text/html"));
Thanks everyone!

- 1,764
- 3
- 22
- 34

- 835
- 11
- 15
-
1This is the most flexible answer (and really should be the default configuration these days). To add to this answer, JSON is the default, including from browser. To view XML, add query string: ?xml=true – raider33 Mar 30 '14 at 14:04
-
Tried a number of strategies. Had a simple test for both XML and JSON and this worked out of the box – pat capozzi Jun 17 '15 at 21:55
One quick option is to use the MediaTypeMapping specialization. Here is an example of using QueryStringMapping in the Application_Start event:
GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.Formatters.JsonFormatter.MediaTypeMappings.Add(new QueryStringMapping("a", "b", "application/json"));
Now whenever the url contains the querystring ?a=b in this case, Json response will be shown in the browser.

- 10,895
- 11
- 52
- 63
-
2This was very useful. You can also use UriPathExtensionMapping instead of QueryStringMapping if you want to use path.to/item.json – marknuzz Apr 13 '12 at 23:28
Don't use your browser to test your API.
Instead, try to use an HTTP client that allows you to specify your request, such as CURL, or even Fiddler.
The problem with this issue is in the client, not in the API. The web API behaves correctly, according to the browser's request.

- 8,839
- 12
- 65
- 108

- 647
- 4
- 9
-
33
-
5I think the point here is correct and important - we should not overfix a working part of the application (the MVC WebAPI infrastructure) if the problem is caused by the client. The real use case for an Api is to be properly used (by supplying correct headers), which is responsibility of the application. I disagree with completely discarding the browser though - for testing, there are plenty of tools for almost any browser (Rest Client-like extensions to start with). – Ivaylo Slavov Apr 25 '14 at 21:30
-
8
Most of the above answers makes perfect sense. Since you are seeing data being formatted in XML format ,that means XML formatter is applied,SO you can see JSON format just by removing the XMLFormatter from the HttpConfiguration parameter like
public static void Register(HttpConfiguration config)
{
config.Routes.MapHttpRoute(
name: "DefaultApi",
routeTemplate: "{controller}/{id}",
defaults: new { id = RouteParameter.Optional }
);
config.Formatters.Remove(config.Formatters.XmlFormatter);
config.EnableSystemDiagnosticsTracing();
}
since JSON is the default format

- 408
- 5
- 19
Returning the correct format is done by the media-type formatter.
As others mentioned, you can do this in the WebApiConfig
class:
public static class WebApiConfig
{
public static void Register(HttpConfiguration config)
{
...
// Configure Web API to return JSON
config.Formatters.JsonFormatter
.SupportedMediaTypes.Add(new System.Net.Http.Headers.MediaTypeHeaderValue("text/html"));
...
}
}
For more, check:
In case your actions are returning XML (which is the case by default) and you need just a specific method to return JSON, you can then use an ActionFilterAttribute
and apply it to that specific action.
Filter attribute:
public class JsonOutputAttribute : ActionFilterAttribute
{
public override void OnActionExecuted(HttpActionExecutedContext actionExecutedContext)
{
ObjectContent content = actionExecutedContext.Response.Content as ObjectContent;
var value = content.Value;
Type targetType = actionExecutedContext.Response.Content.GetType().GetGenericArguments()[0];
var httpResponseMsg = new HttpResponseMessage
{
StatusCode = HttpStatusCode.OK,
RequestMessage = actionExecutedContext.Request,
Content = new ObjectContent(targetType, value, new JsonMediaTypeFormatter(), (string)null)
};
actionExecutedContext.Response = httpResponseMsg;
base.OnActionExecuted(actionExecutedContext);
}
}
Applying to action:
[JsonOutput]
public IEnumerable<Person> GetPersons()
{
return _repository.AllPersons(); // the returned output will be in JSON
}
Note that you can omit the word Attribute
on the action decoration and use just [JsonOutput]
instead of [JsonOutputAttribute]
.

- 6,892
- 7
- 57
- 73
I used a global action filter to remove Accept: application/xml
when the User-Agent
header contains "Chrome":
internal class RemoveXmlForGoogleChromeFilter : IActionFilter
{
public bool AllowMultiple
{
get { return false; }
}
public async Task<HttpResponseMessage> ExecuteActionFilterAsync(
HttpActionContext actionContext,
CancellationToken cancellationToken,
Func<Task<HttpResponseMessage>> continuation)
{
var userAgent = actionContext.Request.Headers.UserAgent.ToString();
if (userAgent.Contains("Chrome"))
{
var acceptHeaders = actionContext.Request.Headers.Accept;
var header =
acceptHeaders.SingleOrDefault(
x => x.MediaType.Contains("application/xml"));
acceptHeaders.Remove(header);
}
return await continuation();
}
}
Seems to work.

- 89,048
- 55
- 235
- 380
config.Formatters.Remove(config.Formatters.XmlFormatter);

- 3,369
- 3
- 11
- 37

- 358
- 4
- 7
-
3While this code may answer the question, providing additional context regarding how and/or why it solves the problem would improve the answer's long-term value. Please read this https://stackoverflow.com/help/how-to-answer – S.R Jul 01 '17 at 04:52
I found the Chrome app "Advanced REST Client" excellent to work with REST services. You can set the Content-Type to application/json
among other things:
Advanced REST client

- 2,076
- 2
- 40
- 61

- 908
- 9
- 20
It's unclear to me why there is all of this complexity in the answer. Sure there are lots of ways you can do this, with QueryStrings, headers and options... but what I believe to be the best practice is simple. You request a plain URL (ex: http://yourstartup.com/api/cars
) and in return you get JSON. You get JSON with the proper response header:
Content-Type: application/json
In looking for an answer to this very same question, I found this thread, and had to keep going because this accepted answer doesn't work exactly. I did find an answer which I feel is just too simple not to be the best one:
Set the default WebAPI formatter
I'll add my tip here as well.
WebApiConfig.cs
namespace com.yourstartup
{
using ...;
using System.Net.Http.Formatting;
...
config.Formatters.Clear(); //because there are defaults of XML..
config.Formatters.Add(new JsonMediaTypeFormatter());
}
I do have a question of where the defaults (at least the ones I am seeing) come from. Are they .NET defaults, or perhaps created somewhere else (by someone else on my project). Anways, hope this helps.
You can use as below:
GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.Formatters.Clear();
GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.Formatters.Add(new JsonMediaTypeFormatter());

- 185
- 1
- 3
-
If you're making a WebAPI app for just passing JSON messages, consider this answer. – allen1 Dec 31 '18 at 20:35
Here is a solution similar to jayson.centeno's and other answers, but using the built-in extension from System.Net.Http.Formatting
.
public static void Register(HttpConfiguration config)
{
// add support for the 'format' query param
// cref: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/hongyes/archive/2012/09/02/support-format-in-asp-net-web-api.aspx
config.Formatters.JsonFormatter.AddQueryStringMapping("$format", "json", "application/json");
config.Formatters.XmlFormatter.AddQueryStringMapping("$format", "xml", "application/xml");
// ... additional configuration
}
The solution was primarily geared toward supporting $format for OData in the early releases of WebApi, but it also applies to the non-OData implementation, and returns the
Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8
header in the response.
It allows you to tack &$format=json
or &$format=xml
to the end of your uri when testing with a browser. It does not interfere with other expected behavior when using a non-browser client where you can set your own headers.
Just add those two line of code on your WebApiConfig class
public static class WebApiConfig
{
public static void Register(HttpConfiguration config)
{
//add this two line
config.Formatters.Clear();
config.Formatters.Add(new JsonMediaTypeFormatter());
............................
}
}

- 435
- 1
- 6
- 20
You just change the App_Start/WebApiConfig.cs
like this:
public static void Register(HttpConfiguration config)
{
// Web API configuration and services
// Web API routes
config.MapHttpAttributeRoutes();
//Below formatter is used for returning the Json result.
var appXmlType = config.Formatters.XmlFormatter.SupportedMediaTypes.FirstOrDefault(t => t.MediaType == "application/xml");
config.Formatters.XmlFormatter.SupportedMediaTypes.Remove(appXmlType);
//Default route
config.Routes.MapHttpRoute(
name: "ApiControllerOnly",
routeTemplate: "api/{controller}"
);
}

- 2,594
- 4
- 26
- 36
-
Removing a formatter is generally not a good idea, you are removing functionality. – naspinski Feb 08 '16 at 15:36
-
Actually in this case, it works well for me, also many others suggest a way like this. I've learned it from http://myview.rahulnivi.net/building-spa-angular-mvc-5/ book! – vaheeds Feb 08 '16 at 19:03
Some time has passed since this question was asked (and answered) but another option is to override the Accept header on the server during request processing using a MessageHandler as below:
public class ForceableContentTypeDelegationHandler : DelegatingHandler
{
protected async override Task<HttpResponseMessage> SendAsync(
HttpRequestMessage request,
CancellationToken cancellationToken)
{
var someOtherCondition = false;
var accHeader = request.Headers.GetValues("Accept").FirstOrDefault();
if (someOtherCondition && accHeader.Contains("application/xml"))
{
request.Headers.Remove("Accept");
request.Headers.Add("Accept", "application/json");
}
return await base.SendAsync(request, cancellationToken);
}
}
Where someOtherCondition
can be anything including browser type, etc. This would be for conditional cases where only sometimes do we want to override the default content negotiation. Otherwise as per other answers, you would simply remove an unnecessary formatter from the configuration.
You'll need to register it of course. You can either do this globally:
public static void Register(HttpConfiguration config) {
config.MessageHandlers.Add(new ForceableContentTypeDelegationHandler());
}
or on a route by route basis:
config.Routes.MapHttpRoute(
name: "SpecialContentRoute",
routeTemplate: "api/someUrlThatNeedsSpecialTreatment/{id}",
defaults: new { controller = "SpecialTreatment" id = RouteParameter.Optional },
constraints: null,
handler: new ForceableContentTypeDelegationHandler()
);
And since this is a message handler it will run on both the request and response ends of the pipeline much like an HttpModule
. So you could easily acknowledge the override with a custom header:
public class ForceableContentTypeDelegationHandler : DelegatingHandler
{
protected async override Task<HttpResponseMessage> SendAsync(
HttpRequestMessage request,
CancellationToken cancellationToken)
{
var wasForced = false;
var someOtherCondition = false;
var accHeader = request.Headers.GetValues("Accept").FirstOrDefault();
if (someOtherCondition && accHeader.Contains("application/xml"))
{
request.Headers.Remove("Accept");
request.Headers.Add("Accept", "application/json");
wasForced = true;
}
var response = await base.SendAsync(request, cancellationToken);
if (wasForced){
response.Headers.Add("X-ForcedContent", "We overrode your content prefs, sorry");
}
return response;
}
}

- 11,932
- 16
- 76
- 116
Here is the easiest way that I have used in my applications. Add given below 3 lines of code in App_Start\WebApiConfig.cs
in the Register
function:
var formatters = GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.Formatters;
formatters.Remove(formatters.XmlFormatter);
config.Formatters.JsonFormatter.SupportedMediaTypes.Add(new MediaTypeHeaderValue("application/json"));
Asp.net web API will automatically serialize your returning object to JSON and as the application/json
is added in the header so the browser or the receiver will understand that you are returning JSON result.

- 3,369
- 3
- 11
- 37

- 10,662
- 14
- 58
- 100
From MSDN Building a Single Page Application with ASP.NET and AngularJS (about 41 mins in).
public static class WebApiConfig
{
public static void Register(HttpConfiguration config)
{
// ... possible routing etc.
// Setup to return json and camelcase it!
var formatter = GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.Formatters.JsonFormatter;
formatter.SerializerSettings.ContractResolver =
new Newtonsoft.Json.Serialization.CamelCasePropertyNamesContractResolver();
}
It should be current, I tried it and it worked.

- 8,161
- 9
- 45
- 62
WebApiConfig is the place where you can configure whether you want to output in json or xml. By default, it is xml. In the register function, we can use HttpConfiguration Formatters to format the output.
System.Net.Http.Headers => MediaTypeHeaderValue("text/html")
is required to get the output in the json format.
Using Felipe Leusin's answer for years, after a recent update of core libraries and of Json.Net, I ran into a System.MissingMethodException
:SupportedMediaTypes.
The solution in my case, hopefully helpful to others experiencing the same unexpected exception, is to install System.Net.Http
. NuGet apparently removes it in some circumstances. After a manual installation, the issue was resolved.

- 10,310
- 7
- 64
- 81
I'm astonished to see so many replies requiring coding to change a single use case (GET) in one API instead of using a proper tool what has to be installed once and can be used for any API (own or 3rd party) and all use cases.
So the good answer is:

- 4,499
- 2
- 27
- 19
-
Some prefer doing things without adding bloat in the form of extra tools and libraries. – tno2007 Feb 24 '20 at 16:15
-
It is still wrong to make changes to the API only because someone is using the wrong tool for the job. A web browser is not designed to test APIs, not even to view the output of APIs but to view documents. It is even worse if someone thinks an API tester tool is bloat instead of part of mandatory toolkit for any API developer, and honestly I would add front end developers too because they need to interact and experiment with APIs as well. It's also probably not enough because the browser without addins doesn't allow to set headers, post to an API or even inspect response headers. – user3285954 Feb 24 '20 at 20:51
-
I understand what you're saying and you're not wrong. But just off-topic, the reason why you are getting down-voted is the tone in which you answer the question. You sound very combative and come across as that developer that think they know everything, and that's very distasteful. I'm certain you are a great developer, judging by your responses. But, you must learn, especially in a professional QA environment like this, to address and convince people in a friendlier and more human way. Perhaps, first give the answer they want, then explain a better way, and motivate why it's better. – tno2007 Feb 25 '20 at 00:18