148

I have a question I know this was posted many times but I didn't find an answer to my problem. The problem is that I have a table and a column "id" I want it to be unique number just as normal. This type of column is serial and the next value after each insert is coming from a sequence so everything seems to be all right but it still sometimes shows this error. I don't know why. In the documentation, it says the sequence is foolproof and always works. If I add a UNIQUE constraint to that column will it help? I worked before many times on Postres but this error is showing for me for the first time. I did everything as normal and I never had this problem before. Can you help me to find the answer that can be used in the future for all tables that will be created? Let's say we have something easy like this:

CREATE TABLE comments
(
  id serial NOT NULL,
  some_column text NOT NULL,
  CONSTRAINT id_pkey PRIMARY KEY (id)
)
WITH (
  OIDS=FALSE
);
ALTER TABLE interesting.comments OWNER TO postgres;

If i add:

ALTER TABLE comments ADD CONSTRAINT id_id_key UNIQUE(id)

Will if be enough or is there some other thing that should be done?

jss367
  • 4,759
  • 14
  • 54
  • 76
red
  • 1,489
  • 2
  • 10
  • 3
  • 1
    Show the code that's inserting the data; having the primary key will already force a unique constraint, so you don't need to add that. – El Yobo Dec 15 '10 at 09:21

13 Answers13

273

This article explains that your sequence might be out of sync and that you have to manually bring it back in sync.

An excerpt from the article in case the URL changes:

If you get this message when trying to insert data into a PostgreSQL database:

ERROR:  duplicate key violates unique constraint

That likely means that the primary key sequence in the table you're working with has somehow become out of sync, likely because of a mass import process (or something along those lines). Call it a "bug by design", but it seems that you have to manually reset the a primary key index after restoring from a dump file. At any rate, to see if your values are out of sync, run these two commands:

SELECT MAX(the_primary_key) FROM the_table;   
SELECT nextval('the_primary_key_sequence');

If the first value is higher than the second value, your sequence is out of sync. Back up your PG database (just in case), then run this command:

SELECT setval('the_primary_key_sequence', (SELECT MAX(the_primary_key) FROM the_table)+1);

That will set the sequence to the next available value that's higher than any existing primary key in the sequence.

F. Suyuti
  • 327
  • 3
  • 18
adamo
  • 3,584
  • 1
  • 18
  • 23
  • 63
    For me, I didn't know how to get "the_primary_key_sequence" -- you can see in [this other answer](https://stackoverflow.com/a/18233092/1370384) that you can use a method called `pg_get_serial_sequence('table_name', 'field_name')` to get this to work. – user Sep 19 '18 at 14:29
  • 4
    Sure enough this fixed it - anyone have any insight on how these can get out of sync though? – thaddeusmt Nov 27 '18 at 04:53
  • 8
    `SELECT setval('the_primary_key_sequence', (SELECT MAX(the_primary_key) FROM the_table)+1);` may not be fully correct. If the MAX(the_primary_key) value is for example 9 and nextval item is 9, it is enough to run `SELECT setval('the_primary_key_sequence', (SELECT MAX(the_primary_key) FROM the_table));`. This would automatically produce nextval sequence incrementation. If you add +1, result would be jumping one sequence. Awesome answer! Helped me to resolve this issue! – Nevio Vesić Mar 12 '19 at 16:03
  • 1
    if in doubt how your sequence is called, call SELECT c.relname FROM pg_class c WHERE c.relkind = 'S'; if you use multiple schemas, keep in mind that sequences are unique per schema, so unless your sequence is in public schema you need to call SELECT nextval('schema.sequence_name'); to get it – vanomart Jul 05 '19 at 09:12
  • 1
    Just to be clear the command is: `SELECT setval(pg_get_serial_sequence('table', 'id'), (SELECT MAX(id) FROM table)+1);` thanks @user – MarMat Aug 20 '19 at 19:20
  • what is `'the_primary_key_sequence'` supposed to be replaced with? – Preethi Vaidyanathan Aug 29 '19 at 19:25
  • 3
    ^ To answer my own question, you do this to find it: `\d "table_name";` – Preethi Vaidyanathan Aug 29 '19 at 21:11
  • 1
    @P.V. you can also get `the_primary_key_sequence` via: `SELECT pg_get_serial_sequence('the_table', 'the_primary_key')` – BigRon Sep 09 '19 at 15:19
  • 1
    Hi. In case the queries weren't making sense to anyone, let me give an example to hopefully help: My table showed sid as Primary key, so I used this query to check the max primary key: `MAX(sid) FROM schema_name.table_name;` -sid is a column in my table and represents the primary key. -schema_name is the schema my table is located. -table_name is the name of the table throwing the duplicate key error. This is what I ran to check the next value of primary key sequence: `SELECT nextval(pg_get_serial_sequence('schema_name.table_name', 'sid'));` I hope this is of some sort of help. – Tim Jan 16 '20 at 20:51
  • To everyone who is curious how this can happen! I had `pg_catalog.setval('public.page_id_seq', 144842, true);` in my backup file. – A.F.N Dec 30 '21 at 17:30
  • The linked article requires signing in with username and password, Do you have an alternative source? – Papooch Sep 01 '23 at 21:59
49

Intro

I also encountered this problem and the solution proposed by @adamo was basically the right solution. However, I had to invest a lot of time in the details, which is why I am now writing a new answer in order to save this time for others.

Case

My case was as follows: There was a table that was filled with data using an app. Now a new entry had to be inserted manually via SQL. After that the sequence was out of sync and no more records could be inserted via the app.

Solution

As mentioned in the answer from @adamo, the sequence must be synchronized manually. For this purpose the name of the sequence is needed. For Postgres, the name of the sequence can be determined with the command PG_GET_SERIAL_SEQUENCE. Most examples use lower case table names. In my case the tables were created by an ORM middleware (like Hibernate or Entity Framework Core etc.) and their names all started with a capital letter.

In an e-mail from 2004 (link) I got the right hint.

(Let's assume for all examples, that Foo is the table's name and Foo_id the related column.)

Command to get the sequence name:

SELECT PG_GET_SERIAL_SEQUENCE('"Foo"', 'Foo_id');

So, the table name must be in double quotes, surrounded by single quotes.

1. Validate, that the sequence is out-of-sync

SELECT CURRVAL(PG_GET_SERIAL_SEQUENCE('"Foo"', 'Foo_id')) AS "Current Value", MAX("Foo_id") AS "Max Value" FROM "Foo";

When the Current Value is less than Max Value, your sequence is out-of-sync.

2. Correction

SELECT SETVAL((SELECT PG_GET_SERIAL_SEQUENCE('"Foo"', 'Foo_id')), (SELECT (MAX("Foo_id") + 1) FROM "Foo"), FALSE);
SommerEngineering
  • 1,412
  • 1
  • 20
  • 26
  • 1
    This worked for me. There was some glitch with importing a table which caused the id_seq to go out of sync. This solution fixed it for me. – prcoder Dec 08 '20 at 13:43
  • is there a script that could do that dynamically? replace Foo with all tables , Foo_id with all primary keys – Mina Fawzy Jul 14 '21 at 21:59
  • 4
    I received `currval of sequence "request_request_id_seq" is not yet defined in this session` and had to used `SELECT last_value FROM ;` – scrollout Oct 22 '21 at 14:16
  • 1
    Very useful especially for finding the sequence name. – Mr Br Mar 17 '22 at 14:14
  • What if my sequence is not out of sync? I have max value 1255214 and current value 1255216 – Cherona May 05 '22 at 10:18
  • So helpful! On supabase the sequence name to use was: `'public.names_id_seq'` for a table `names` with column `id` – Jannie Theunissen Jul 25 '22 at 20:19
  • i fix the problem but after of time i got same error.... exist one way that postgres will get always max ID? – Chevelle Aug 26 '22 at 21:47
26

Replace the table_name to your actual name of the table.

  1. Gives the current last id for the table. Note it that for next step.
SELECT MAX(id) FROM table_name;  

  1. Get the next id sequence according to postgresql. Make sure this id is higher than the current max id we get from step 1
SELECT nextVal('"table_name_id_seq"');
  1. if it's not higher than then use this step 3 to update the next sequence.
SELECT setval('"table_name_id_seq"', (SELECT MAX(id) FROM table_name)+1);
Salman
  • 892
  • 12
  • 13
7

Referrence - https://www.calazan.com/how-to-reset-the-primary-key-sequence-in-postgresql-with-django/

I had the same problem try this: python manage.py sqlsequencereset table_name

Eg:

python manage.py sqlsequencereset auth

you need to run this in production settings(if you have) and you need Postgres installed to run this on the server

Keval
  • 557
  • 10
  • 15
  • 3
    Thanks. This saved my life + time both. Just`python manage.py sqlsequencereset app_name | python manage.py dbshell` and it's done. – hygull Sep 08 '21 at 16:02
6

The primary key is already protecting you from inserting duplicate values, as you're experiencing when you get that error. Adding another unique constraint isn't necessary to do that.

The "duplicate key" error is telling you that the work was not done because it would produce a duplicate key, not that it discovered a duplicate key already commited to the table.

Stephen Denne
  • 36,219
  • 10
  • 45
  • 60
6

For future searchs, use ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING.

rafaelnaskar
  • 619
  • 6
  • 11
  • what if I already have an on conflict on another column which is not the primary key – PirateApp Dec 30 '20 at 06:51
  • 2
    You can specify column names, indexes or constraint name. Example: ON CONFLICT (column_name) reference: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/sql-insert.html – rafaelnaskar Dec 31 '20 at 14:09
2

From http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/interactive/datatype.html

Note: Prior to PostgreSQL 7.3, serial implied UNIQUE. This is no longer automatic. If you wish a serial column to be in a unique constraint or a primary key, it must now be specified, same as with any other data type.

Frank Heikens
  • 117,544
  • 24
  • 142
  • 135
stacker
  • 68,052
  • 28
  • 140
  • 210
2

In my case carate table script is:

CREATE TABLE public."Survey_symptom_binds"
(
    id integer NOT NULL DEFAULT nextval('"Survey_symptom_binds_id_seq"'::regclass),
    survey_id integer,
    "order" smallint,
    symptom_id integer,
    CONSTRAINT "Survey_symptom_binds_pkey" PRIMARY KEY (id)
)

SO:

SELECT nextval('"Survey_symptom_binds_id_seq"'::regclass),
       MAX(id) 
  FROM public."Survey_symptom_binds"; 
  
SELECT nextval('"Survey_symptom_binds_id_seq"'::regclass) less than MAX(id) !!!

Try to fix the proble:

SELECT setval('"Survey_symptom_binds_id_seq"', (SELECT MAX(id) FROM public."Survey_symptom_binds")+1);

Good Luck every one!

Jin Lee
  • 3,194
  • 12
  • 46
  • 86
1

I had the same problem. It was because of the type of my relations. I had a table property which related to both states and cities. So, at first I had a relation from property to states as OneToOne, and the same for cities. And I had the same error "duplicate key violates unique constraint". That means that: I can only have one property related to one state and city. But that doesnt make sense, because a city can have multiple properties. So the problem is the relation. The relation should be ManyToOne. Many properties to One city

0

Table name started with a capital letter if tables were created by an ORM middleware (like Hibernate or Entity Framework Core etc.)

SELECT setval('"Table_name_Id_seq"', (SELECT MAX("Id") FROM "Table_name") + 1)
WHERE
    NOT EXISTS (
        SELECT *
        FROM  (SELECT CURRVAL(PG_GET_SERIAL_SEQUENCE('"Table_name"', 'Id')) AS seq, MAX("Id") AS max_id
               FROM "Table_name") AS seq_table
        WHERE seq > max_id
    )
Igor
  • 19
  • 3
0

try that CLI

it's just a suggestion to enhance the adamo code (thanks a lot adamo)

SELECT setval('tableName_columnName_seq', (SELECT MAX(columnName) FROM tableName));
buddemat
  • 4,552
  • 14
  • 29
  • 49
-2

For programatically solution at Django. Based on Paolo Melchiorre's answer, I wrote a chunk as a function to be called before any .save()

from django.db import connection
def setSqlCursor(db_table):
    sql = """SELECT pg_catalog.setval(pg_get_serial_sequence('"""+db_table+"""', 'id'), MAX(id)) FROM """+db_table+""";"""
    with connection.cursor() as cursor:
        cursor.execute(sql)
-15

I have similar problem but I solved it by removing all the foreign key in my Postgresql