169

How to read a file in reverse order using python? I want to read a file from last line to first line.

martineau
  • 119,623
  • 25
  • 170
  • 301
Nimmy
  • 5,051
  • 7
  • 33
  • 32
  • 10
    Do you mean "read it in reverse order" or "process the lines in reverse order"? There's a difference. With the first, potentially the file would not fit in memory all at the same time, so you want to process the lines in reverse order, but you can't read the entire file in and reverse it. With the second, you might just read the entire file in, and reverse the list of lines before processing them. So which is it? – Lasse V. Karlsen Feb 20 '10 at 10:18
  • 1
    See also: [Get last n lines of a file with Python, similar to tail](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/136168) – hippietrail Nov 05 '12 at 19:29
  • 1
    I recommend this -- no memory problems and fast: http://stackoverflow.com/a/260433/1212562 – Brian B Dec 05 '12 at 21:11

21 Answers21

187

A correct, efficient answer written as a generator.

import os

def reverse_readline(filename, buf_size=8192):
    """A generator that returns the lines of a file in reverse order"""
    with open(filename, 'rb') as fh:
        segment = None
        offset = 0
        fh.seek(0, os.SEEK_END)
        file_size = remaining_size = fh.tell()
        while remaining_size > 0:
            offset = min(file_size, offset + buf_size)
            fh.seek(file_size - offset)
            buffer = fh.read(min(remaining_size, buf_size)).decode(encoding='utf-8')
            remaining_size -= buf_size
            lines = buffer.split('\n')
            # The first line of the buffer is probably not a complete line so
            # we'll save it and append it to the last line of the next buffer
            # we read
            if segment is not None:
                # If the previous chunk starts right from the beginning of line
                # do not concat the segment to the last line of new chunk.
                # Instead, yield the segment first 
                if buffer[-1] != '\n':
                    lines[-1] += segment
                else:
                    yield segment
            segment = lines[0]
            for index in range(len(lines) - 1, 0, -1):
                if lines[index]:
                    yield lines[index]
        # Don't yield None if the file was empty
        if segment is not None:
            yield segment
smichr
  • 16,948
  • 2
  • 27
  • 34
srohde
  • 1,895
  • 2
  • 11
  • 3
  • 8
    That won't work for *text* files in python>=3.2, since for some reason seeks relative to the end of file are no longer supported. Can be fixed by saving the size of file returned by `fh.seek(0, os.SEEK_END)` and changing the `fh.seek(-offset, os.SEEK_END)` too `fh.seek(file_size - offset)`. – levesque Oct 07 '15 at 14:58
  • 13
    After the edits made, this works perfectly in python 3.5. Best answer to the question. – notbad.jpeg Jan 20 '16 at 23:55
  • 3
    revert [this change](http://stackoverflow.com/review/suggested-edits/10428792) for python 2 where `fh.seek()` returns `None` – marengaz Mar 15 '16 at 09:15
  • 4
    Watch out that this may not work as expected for text files. Getting blocks correctly in reversed order only works for binary files. The problem is that for text files with multi-byte encoding (such as `utf8`), `seek()` and `read()` refer to different sizes. That is probably also the reason why the non-zero first argument of `seek()` relative to `os.SEEK_END` is not supported. – norok2 Jul 23 '18 at 15:06
  • @norok2: can you please elaborate & provide a simple example when this will fail? – Azat Ibrakov Nov 13 '18 at 14:02
  • 5
    simple: `'aöaö'.encode()` is `b'a\xc3\xb6a\xc3\xb6'`. If you save this to disk and then read in text mode, when you do `seek(2)` it will move by two bytes, so that `seek(2); read(1)` will result in an error `UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0xb6 in position 0: invalid start byte`, but if you do `seek(0); read(2); read(1)`, you will get the `'a'` you were expecting, that is: `seek()` is never encoding-aware, `read()` is if you open the file in text mode. Now if have `'aöaö' * 1000000`, your blocks will not be aligned correctly. – norok2 Nov 14 '18 at 13:25
  • 1
    As a side note, this is implemented in a encoding-aware fashion in the [flyingcircus](https://pypi.org/project/flyingcircus/) package (`flyingcircus.util.readline(reverse=True)`). Disclaimer: I am the author of the package. – norok2 Nov 14 '18 at 13:49
  • @norok2 nice but ugh, a 25 MB dependency on scipy – Nemo Feb 08 '20 at 00:20
  • 1
    @Nemo This is now repackaged to have NumPy / SciPy dependencies in [`flyingcircus-numeric`](https://pypi.org/project/flyingcircus-numeric/) while this function is still in [`flyingcircus`](https://pypi.org/project/flyingcircus/) as `flyingcircus.readline()`. – norok2 May 08 '20 at 08:45
  • 1
    this skips blank lines – OD IUM May 09 '20 at 00:49
  • as norok says, this potentially breaks with utf chars that are multi byte – Jules G.M. Aug 27 '21 at 04:25
  • 1
    This did not work for me in Python 3.8 when reading from a csv file. I had to make sure to read as binary for the seek to work properly then decode as utf-8. See relevant question https://stackoverflow.com/a/49685142/15531842 ... Changing: ```with open(filename, 'rb') as fh:``` and ```buffer = fh.read(min(remaining_size, buf_size)).decode(encoding='utf-8')``` – lane Aug 10 '22 at 02:44
  • I updated the code with your comments. This now works on a text file that was failing with the code as given, [lane](https://stackoverflow.com/users/15531842/lane). – smichr Jan 22 '23 at 00:26
93
for line in reversed(open("filename").readlines()):
    print line.rstrip()

And in Python 3:

for line in reversed(list(open("filename"))):
    print(line.rstrip())
Matt Joiner
  • 112,946
  • 110
  • 377
  • 526
  • 266
    Alas, this doesn't work if you can't fit the whole file in memory. – vy32 Feb 28 '10 at 19:31
  • The posted Python 3 method does not work (although I wish it did). – William Mar 06 '13 at 17:03
  • 9
    Also, while the posted code does answer the question, we should be careful to close files that we open. The `with` statement is usually quite painless. – William Mar 07 '13 at 14:41
  • All of the answers require that the entire file is read into memory. Is it possible to use an iterator function like next() backwards? – Michael David Watson Apr 28 '13 at 18:06
  • 1
    @MichaelDavidWatson: Not without reading the original iterator into memory first and then presenting a new iterator over the first one in reverse. – Matt Joiner Apr 29 '13 at 01:40
  • 3
    @MichaelDavidWatson: You can read a file in reverse without reading it into memory but it's nontrivial and requires lots of buffer shenanigans to avoid considerable system call waste. It'll also perform very badly (albeit better than reading the entire memory into memory if the file exceeds the available memory). – Matt Joiner Apr 29 '13 at 01:43
  • 1
    @William Sorry, how do I use the above solution using "with open" whilst iterating over the file and then clean-close it? – BringBackCommodore64 Mar 13 '17 at 16:09
  • Assuming files will always fit in memory is not a great solution and shouldn't be accepted or canonical. @MattJoiner: being scaleable is not a "corner case". – smci Apr 24 '18 at 23:03
  • 1
    Voted down. This answer has a few not-so-well-thought things: casting a TextIOWrapper handle straight to a list without closing it and exhausting it fully into memory, doing a reversal operation with memory (when not needed, the other answer only reads backwards from the disk) and then outputting stripped lines. – hegez Jun 10 '18 at 19:34
  • 1
    But what is bad about reversing +10GB files in memory? First: you may not have enough memory to just copy the entire file, second: it's slower than just reading backwards, and third: it wastes memory space from other processes and Python may even get OOM-killed that way. Just truly reading the file backwards without copying file fully inside memory scales well as it has no memory limit by file size, and it's as fast as reading normally. – hegez Jun 10 '18 at 19:40
36

You can also use python module file_read_backwards.

After installing it, via pip install file_read_backwards (v1.2.1), you can read the entire file backwards (line-wise) in a memory efficient manner via:

#!/usr/bin/env python2.7

from file_read_backwards import FileReadBackwards

with FileReadBackwards("/path/to/file", encoding="utf-8") as frb:
    for l in frb:
         print l

It supports "utf-8","latin-1", and "ascii" encodings.

Support is also available for python3. Further documentation can be found at http://file-read-backwards.readthedocs.io/en/latest/readme.html

user7321751
  • 409
  • 4
  • 4
  • Thanks for this solution. I like (and also upvoted) the solution above by @srohde since it helped me understand how it's done, but as a developer I prefer using an existing module when I can, so I'm happy to know about this one. – joanis Nov 02 '18 at 20:43
  • 2
    This works with multibyte encoding like UTF-8. The seek/read solution does not: seek() counts in bytes, read() in characters. – Jeremitu Jul 27 '19 at 13:27
  • 1
    On a 42MB text file where I only want to read the last 500kB or so, this was noticeably slower than reading/parsing the whole file (python 3.6.8 on CentOS 7). I am mainly looking for a way to keep my parsing program quick as the file grows, since I only need the last N matches. – Arthur Hebert-Ryan Mar 01 '21 at 04:56
23

How about something like this:

import os


def readlines_reverse(filename):
    with open(filename) as qfile:
        qfile.seek(0, os.SEEK_END)
        position = qfile.tell()
        line = ''
        while position >= 0:
            qfile.seek(position)
            next_char = qfile.read(1)
            if next_char == "\n":
                yield line[::-1]
                line = ''
            else:
                line += next_char
            position -= 1
        yield line[::-1]


if __name__ == '__main__':
    for qline in readlines_reverse(raw_input()):
        print qline

Since the file is read character by character in reverse order, it will work even on very large files, as long as individual lines fit into memory.

Berislav Lopac
  • 16,656
  • 6
  • 71
  • 80
19

Accepted answer won't work for cases with large files that won't fit in memory (which is not a rare case).

As it was noted by others, @srohde answer looks good, but it has next issues:

  • openning file looks redundant, when we can pass file object & leave it to user to decide in which encoding it should be read,
  • even if we refactor to accept file object, it won't work for all encodings: we can choose file with utf-8 encoding and non-ascii contents like
й

pass buf_size equal to 1 and will have

    UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf8' codec can't decode byte 0xb9 in position 0: invalid start byte

of course text may be larger but buf_size may be picked up so it'll lead to obfuscated error like above,

  • we can't specify custom line separator,
  • we can't choose to keep line separator.

So considering all these concerns I've written separate functions:

  • one which works with byte streams,
  • second one which works with text streams and delegates its underlying byte stream to the first one and decodes resulting lines.

First of all let's define next utility functions:

ceil_division for making division with ceiling (in contrast with standard // division with floor, more info can be found in this thread)

def ceil_division(left_number, right_number):
    """
    Divides given numbers with ceiling.
    """
    return -(-left_number // right_number)

split for splitting string by given separator from right end with ability to keep it:

def split(string, separator, keep_separator):
    """
    Splits given string by given separator.
    """
    parts = string.split(separator)
    if keep_separator:
        *parts, last_part = parts
        parts = [part + separator for part in parts]
        if last_part:
            return parts + [last_part]
    return parts

read_batch_from_end to read batch from the right end of binary stream

def read_batch_from_end(byte_stream, size, end_position):
    """
    Reads batch from the end of given byte stream.
    """
    if end_position > size:
        offset = end_position - size
    else:
        offset = 0
        size = end_position
    byte_stream.seek(offset)
    return byte_stream.read(size)

After that we can define function for reading byte stream in reverse order like

import functools
import itertools
import os
from operator import methodcaller, sub


def reverse_binary_stream(byte_stream, batch_size=None,
                          lines_separator=None,
                          keep_lines_separator=True):
    if lines_separator is None:
        lines_separator = (b'\r', b'\n', b'\r\n')
        lines_splitter = methodcaller(str.splitlines.__name__,
                                      keep_lines_separator)
    else:
        lines_splitter = functools.partial(split,
                                           separator=lines_separator,
                                           keep_separator=keep_lines_separator)
    stream_size = byte_stream.seek(0, os.SEEK_END)
    if batch_size is None:
        batch_size = stream_size or 1
    batches_count = ceil_division(stream_size, batch_size)
    remaining_bytes_indicator = itertools.islice(
            itertools.accumulate(itertools.chain([stream_size],
                                                 itertools.repeat(batch_size)),
                                 sub),
            batches_count)
    try:
        remaining_bytes_count = next(remaining_bytes_indicator)
    except StopIteration:
        return

    def read_batch(position):
        result = read_batch_from_end(byte_stream,
                                     size=batch_size,
                                     end_position=position)
        while result.startswith(lines_separator):
            try:
                position = next(remaining_bytes_indicator)
            except StopIteration:
                break
            result = (read_batch_from_end(byte_stream,
                                          size=batch_size,
                                          end_position=position)
                      + result)
        return result

    batch = read_batch(remaining_bytes_count)
    segment, *lines = lines_splitter(batch)
    yield from lines[::-1]
    for remaining_bytes_count in remaining_bytes_indicator:
        batch = read_batch(remaining_bytes_count)
        lines = lines_splitter(batch)
        if batch.endswith(lines_separator):
            yield segment
        else:
            lines[-1] += segment
        segment, *lines = lines
        yield from lines[::-1]
    yield segment

and finally a function for reversing text file can be defined like:

import codecs


def reverse_file(file, batch_size=None,
                 lines_separator=None,
                 keep_lines_separator=True):
    encoding = file.encoding
    if lines_separator is not None:
        lines_separator = lines_separator.encode(encoding)
    yield from map(functools.partial(codecs.decode,
                                     encoding=encoding),
                   reverse_binary_stream(
                           file.buffer,
                           batch_size=batch_size,
                           lines_separator=lines_separator,
                           keep_lines_separator=keep_lines_separator))

Tests

Preparations

I've generated 4 files using fsutil command:

  1. empty.txt with no contents, size 0MB
  2. tiny.txt with size of 1MB
  3. small.txt with size of 10MB
  4. large.txt with size of 50MB

also I've refactored @srohde solution to work with file object instead of file path.

Test script

from timeit import Timer

repeats_count = 7
number = 1
create_setup = ('from collections import deque\n'
                'from __main__ import reverse_file, reverse_readline\n'
                'file = open("{}")').format
srohde_solution = ('with file:\n'
                   '    deque(reverse_readline(file,\n'
                   '                           buf_size=8192),'
                   '          maxlen=0)')
azat_ibrakov_solution = ('with file:\n'
                         '    deque(reverse_file(file,\n'
                         '                       lines_separator="\\n",\n'
                         '                       keep_lines_separator=False,\n'
                         '                       batch_size=8192), maxlen=0)')
print('reversing empty file by "srohde"',
      min(Timer(srohde_solution,
                create_setup('empty.txt')).repeat(repeats_count, number)))
print('reversing empty file by "Azat Ibrakov"',
      min(Timer(azat_ibrakov_solution,
                create_setup('empty.txt')).repeat(repeats_count, number)))
print('reversing tiny file (1MB) by "srohde"',
      min(Timer(srohde_solution,
                create_setup('tiny.txt')).repeat(repeats_count, number)))
print('reversing tiny file (1MB) by "Azat Ibrakov"',
      min(Timer(azat_ibrakov_solution,
                create_setup('tiny.txt')).repeat(repeats_count, number)))
print('reversing small file (10MB) by "srohde"',
      min(Timer(srohde_solution,
                create_setup('small.txt')).repeat(repeats_count, number)))
print('reversing small file (10MB) by "Azat Ibrakov"',
      min(Timer(azat_ibrakov_solution,
                create_setup('small.txt')).repeat(repeats_count, number)))
print('reversing large file (50MB) by "srohde"',
      min(Timer(srohde_solution,
                create_setup('large.txt')).repeat(repeats_count, number)))
print('reversing large file (50MB) by "Azat Ibrakov"',
      min(Timer(azat_ibrakov_solution,
                create_setup('large.txt')).repeat(repeats_count, number)))

Note: I've used collections.deque class to exhaust generator.

Outputs

For PyPy 3.5 on Windows 10:

reversing empty file by "srohde" 8.31e-05
reversing empty file by "Azat Ibrakov" 0.00016090000000000028
reversing tiny file (1MB) by "srohde" 0.160081
reversing tiny file (1MB) by "Azat Ibrakov" 0.09594989999999998
reversing small file (10MB) by "srohde" 8.8891863
reversing small file (10MB) by "Azat Ibrakov" 5.323388100000001
reversing large file (50MB) by "srohde" 186.5338368
reversing large file (50MB) by "Azat Ibrakov" 99.07450229999998

For CPython 3.5 on Windows 10:

reversing empty file by "srohde" 3.600000000000001e-05
reversing empty file by "Azat Ibrakov" 4.519999999999958e-05
reversing tiny file (1MB) by "srohde" 0.01965560000000001
reversing tiny file (1MB) by "Azat Ibrakov" 0.019207699999999994
reversing small file (10MB) by "srohde" 3.1341862999999996
reversing small file (10MB) by "Azat Ibrakov" 3.0872588000000007
reversing large file (50MB) by "srohde" 82.01206720000002
reversing large file (50MB) by "Azat Ibrakov" 82.16775059999998

So as we can see it performs like original solution, but is more general and free of its disadvantages listed above.


Advertisement

I've added this to 0.3.0 version of lz package (requires Python 3.5+) that have many well-tested functional/iterating utilities.

Can be used like

import io
from lz.reversal import reverse
...
with open('path/to/file') as file:
     for line in reverse(file, batch_size=io.DEFAULT_BUFFER_SIZE):
         print(line)

It supports all standard encodings (maybe except utf-7 since it is hard for me to define a strategy for generating strings encodable with it).

Azat Ibrakov
  • 9,998
  • 9
  • 38
  • 50
  • 1
    `from lz.iterating import reverse` should now be `from lz.reversal import reverse` – Gabriel Jablonski Apr 04 '21 at 22:00
  • Now to combine the thoroughness\stream flexibility of this module's code with the python version flexibility, simplicity (being standalone instead of a giant group of functions), and ease of install (simple pip command) of Berislav's answer... but you guys do great work, thanks so much for giving us something a little more straightforward and portable to work from rather than throwing messy functions into our own code\modules. Can't imagine how many people have had to reinvent this wheel over the years. – JeopardyTempest Aug 22 '21 at 04:57
8
import re

def filerev(somefile, buffer=0x20000):
  somefile.seek(0, os.SEEK_END)
  size = somefile.tell()
  lines = ['']
  rem = size % buffer
  pos = max(0, (size // buffer - 1) * buffer)
  while pos >= 0:
    somefile.seek(pos, os.SEEK_SET)
    data = somefile.read(rem + buffer) + lines[0]
    rem = 0
    lines = re.findall('[^\n]*\n?', data)
    ix = len(lines) - 2
    while ix > 0:
      yield lines[ix]
      ix -= 1
    pos -= buffer
  else:
    yield lines[0]

with open(sys.argv[1], 'r') as f:
  for line in filerev(f):
    sys.stdout.write(line)
jamylak
  • 128,818
  • 30
  • 231
  • 230
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
  • 776,304
  • 153
  • 1,341
  • 1,358
  • This appears to produce the wrong output for files larger than buffer. It won't correctly handle lines that span the buffer-sized chunks you read in, as I understand it. I posted another similar answer (to another similar question). – Darius Bacon Feb 20 '10 at 11:43
  • @Darius: Ah yes, I seem to have missed a bit. Should be fixed now. – Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams Feb 20 '10 at 19:10
  • Looks right. I'd still prefer my own code because this does O(N^2) work on a big file that's all one long line. (In the similar answers to the other question that I tested this caused a serious genuine slowdown on such files.) – Darius Bacon Feb 20 '10 at 23:18
  • 3
    Well the question didn't mention performance, so I can't nitpick the performance disaster that is regular expressions :P – Matt Joiner Jun 09 '10 at 11:48
  • Some more explanation would be useful as performance and if this actually can seek to let's say last line and read that piece only. – user1767754 Feb 07 '18 at 05:27
7
for line in reversed(open("file").readlines()):
    print line.rstrip()

If you are on linux, you can use tac command.

$ tac file

2 recipes you can find in ActiveState here and here

ghostdog74
  • 327,991
  • 56
  • 259
  • 343
  • 1
    I wonder if reversed() consumes the whole sequence before iteration. Docs say a `__reversed__()` method is needed, but python2.5 doesn't complain on a custom class without it. – muhuk Feb 20 '10 at 10:27
  • @muhuk, it probably has to cache it somehow, i suspect it generates a new list in reverse order then returns an iterator to that – Matt Joiner Feb 20 '10 at 11:19
  • 1
    @Matt: that would be ridiculous. It simply goes from the back to the front-- len(L)-1 is the back, 0 is the front. You can picture the rest. – Devin Jeanpierre Feb 20 '10 at 12:34
  • @muhuk: Sequences aren't meaningfully consumed (you can iterate over the whole sequence, but it doesn't matter very much). A `__reversed__` method is also not necessary, and there didn't use to be such a thing. If an object provides `__len__` and `__getitem__` it will work just fine (minus some exceptional cases, such as dict). – Devin Jeanpierre Feb 20 '10 at 12:37
  • @Devin Jeanpierre: Only if readlines() returns an object that provides `__reversed__`? – Matt Joiner Feb 20 '10 at 14:05
  • @Matt: It returns a list. Anyway, if an object provides just `__len__` and `__getitem__`, it works just as described (e.g.: http://codepad.org/aglIbcXy ). Lists also work just as described (see the definition of list_reverse (`__reversed__`) at http://svn.python.org/view/python/trunk/Objects/listobject.c?view=markup ). – Devin Jeanpierre Feb 20 '10 at 15:18
  • @Devin: Then my original statement is correct. The full file must be read before the list can be iterated in reverse order. – Matt Joiner Feb 21 '10 at 01:17
  • @Matt: Your original statement was not exactly what I would call correct (or if it was correct, I did not read it as intended). It would read the full file regardless of whether `reversed()` is called on it, because this is what readlines() does. it does not construct the list in reverse order, rather it creates an iterator which iterates over the list (which is in regular order), backwards. – Devin Jeanpierre Feb 21 '10 at 07:07
  • @Devin: Indeed, I think we're both agreeing with the behaviour here (and that it's not ideal): readlines() generates a list, immediately (by reading the whole file). reversed() doesn't not have to generate the reversed list immediately, rather it creates an iterator using len and getitem. finally a reversed operator could be provided for File objects, or readlines() retvars, that actually read the file from back to front, but it is not the case presently, and may not even be ideal. – Matt Joiner Feb 21 '10 at 07:35
  • But if readlines() was returning an iterator with a proper `__reversed__()` it would be cool. In fact both answers using `readlines()` are horribly inefficient for big files. – muhuk Feb 23 '10 at 08:02
  • @muhuk: I use iterators absolutely everywhere possible: Here they're not possible (except to iterate readlines in reverse), but otherwise you can just use `for line in open("file")` – Matt Joiner Jun 09 '10 at 11:46
3

Thanks for the answer @srohde. It has a small bug checking for newline character with 'is' operator, and I could not comment on the answer with 1 reputation. Also I'd like to manage file open outside because that enables me to embed my ramblings for luigi tasks.

What I needed to change has the form:

with open(filename) as fp:
    for line in fp:
        #print line,  # contains new line
        print '>{}<'.format(line)

I'd love to change to:

with open(filename) as fp:
    for line in reversed_fp_iter(fp, 4):
        #print line,  # contains new line
        print '>{}<'.format(line)

Here is a modified answer that wants a file handle and keeps newlines:

def reversed_fp_iter(fp, buf_size=8192):
    """a generator that returns the lines of a file in reverse order
    ref: https://stackoverflow.com/a/23646049/8776239
    """
    segment = None  # holds possible incomplete segment at the beginning of the buffer
    offset = 0
    fp.seek(0, os.SEEK_END)
    file_size = remaining_size = fp.tell()
    while remaining_size > 0:
        offset = min(file_size, offset + buf_size)
        fp.seek(file_size - offset)
        buffer = fp.read(min(remaining_size, buf_size))
        remaining_size -= buf_size
        lines = buffer.splitlines(True)
        # the first line of the buffer is probably not a complete line so
        # we'll save it and append it to the last line of the next buffer
        # we read
        if segment is not None:
            # if the previous chunk starts right from the beginning of line
            # do not concat the segment to the last line of new chunk
            # instead, yield the segment first
            if buffer[-1] == '\n':
                #print 'buffer ends with newline'
                yield segment
            else:
                lines[-1] += segment
                #print 'enlarged last line to >{}<, len {}'.format(lines[-1], len(lines))
        segment = lines[0]
        for index in range(len(lines) - 1, 0, -1):
            if len(lines[index]):
                yield lines[index]
    # Don't yield None if the file was empty
    if segment is not None:
        yield segment
2

Here you can find my my implementation, you can limit the ram usage by changing the "buffer" variable, there is a bug that the program prints an empty line in the beginning.

And also ram usage may be increase if there is no new lines for more than buffer bytes, "leak" variable will increase until seeing a new line ("\n").

This is also working for 16 GB files which is bigger then my total memory.

import os,sys
buffer = 1024*1024 # 1MB
f = open(sys.argv[1])
f.seek(0, os.SEEK_END)
filesize = f.tell()

division, remainder = divmod(filesize, buffer)
line_leak=''

for chunk_counter in range(1,division + 2):
    if division - chunk_counter < 0:
        f.seek(0, os.SEEK_SET)
        chunk = f.read(remainder)
    elif division - chunk_counter >= 0:
        f.seek(-(buffer*chunk_counter), os.SEEK_END)
        chunk = f.read(buffer)

    chunk_lines_reversed = list(reversed(chunk.split('\n')))
    if line_leak: # add line_leak from previous chunk to beginning
        chunk_lines_reversed[0] += line_leak

    # after reversed, save the leakedline for next chunk iteration
    line_leak = chunk_lines_reversed.pop()

    if chunk_lines_reversed:
        print "\n".join(chunk_lines_reversed)
    # print the last leaked line
    if division - chunk_counter < 0:
        print line_leak
Bekir Dogan
  • 150
  • 5
1

a simple function to create a second file reversed (linux only):

import os
def tac(file1, file2):
     print(os.system('tac %s > %s' % (file1,file2)))

how to use

tac('ordered.csv', 'reversed.csv')
f = open('reversed.csv')
jamylak
  • 128,818
  • 30
  • 231
  • 230
  • I think the goal was how to do it in Python. Plus, this only works on *Nix systems, although it's an excellent solution for that. It's essentially just using Python as a prompt to run shell utilities. – Alex Huszagh Feb 24 '16 at 07:50
  • 1
    This code has major security bugs as presently written. What if you're trying to reverse a file created with `mv mycontent.txt $'hello $(rm -rf $HOME) world.txt'`, or similarly using an output file name given by an untrusted user? If you want to handle arbitrary filenames safely, it takes more caution. `subprocess.Popen(['tac', file1], stdout=open(file2, 'w'))` would be safe, for instance. – Charles Duffy Oct 06 '16 at 21:38
  • The existing code also doesn't correctly handle files with spaces, wildcards, &c. – Charles Duffy Oct 06 '16 at 21:41
1

If you are concerned about file size / memory usage, memory-mapping the file and scanning backwards for newlines is a solution:

How to search for a string in text files?

Federico
  • 722
  • 12
  • 12
1

with open("filename") as f:

    print(f.read()[::-1])
JackoM
  • 674
  • 7
  • 4
  • Does this read the whole file in? Is this safe on large files? This seems to be a very easy and realistic way to do it but not sure about the above questions.. I would want to search the file this way (using re).. – ikwyl6 Jan 31 '20 at 03:52
  • @ikwyl6 This should be equivalent to `list(reversed(f.read()))`. – AMC Jun 26 '20 at 01:10
1

Here's a Python 3.8+ approach, using two string buffers, with grep-like substring matching (or just simply iterating each and every line if the empty substring is passed). I'd expect this to be more memory efficient than loading all the file into memory (you can control the buffer size, which is sometimes desirable), e.g. if you only want to find something at the end of a file. Gist here.

from __future__ import annotations

from io import StringIO, SEEK_END
from pathlib import Path
from typing import Iterator, TextIO


def grep_backwards(
    fh: TextIO,
    match_substr: str,
    line_ending: str = "\n",
    strip_eol: bool = False,
    step: int = 10,
) -> Iterator[str]:
    """
    Helper for scanning a file line by line from the end, imitating the behaviour of
    the Unix command line tools ``grep`` (when passed ``match_substr``) or ``tac`` (when
    ``match_substr`` is the empty string ``""``, i.e. matching all lines).

    Args:
      fh            : The file handle to read from
      match_substr  : Substring to match at. If given as the empty string, gives a
                      reverse line iterator rather than a reverse matching line iterator.
      line_ending   : The line ending to split lines on (default: "\n" newline)
      strip_eol     : Whether to strip (default: ``True``) or keep (``False``) line
                      endings off the end of the strings returned by the iterator.
      step          : Number of characters to load into chunk buffer (i.e. chunk size)
    """
    # Store the end of file (EOF) position as we are advancing backwards from there
    file_end_pos = fh.seek(0, SEEK_END)  # cursor has moved to EOF
    # Keep a reversed string line buffer as we are writing right-to-left
    revlinebuf = StringIO()
    # Keep a [left-to-right] string buffer as we read left-to-right, one chunk at a time
    chunk_buf = StringIO()
    # Initialise 'last chunk start' at position after the EOF (unreachable by ``read``)
    last_chunk_start = file_end_pos + 1
    line_offset = 0  # relative to SEEK_END
    has_EOF_newline = False  # may change upon finding first newline
    # In the worst case, seek all the way back to the start (position 0)
    while last_chunk_start > 0:
        # Ensure that read(size=step) will read at least 1 character
        # e.g. when step=4, last_chunk_start=3, reduce step to 3 --> chunk=[0,1,2]
        if step > last_chunk_start:
            step = last_chunk_start
        chunk_start = last_chunk_start - step
        fh.seek(chunk_start)
        # Read in the chunk for the current step (possibly after pre-existing chunks)
        chunk_buf.write(fh.read(step))
        while chunk := chunk_buf.getvalue():
            # Keep reading intra-chunk lines RTL, leaving any leftovers in revlinebuf
            lhs, EOL_match, rhs = chunk.rpartition(line_ending)
            if EOL_match:
                if line_offset == 0:
                    has_EOF_newline = rhs == ""
                # Reverse the right-hand-side of the rightmost line_ending and
                # insert it after anything already in the reversed line buffer
                if rhs:
                    # Only bother writing rhs to line buffer if there's anything in it
                    revlinebuf.write(rhs[::-1])
                # Un-reverse the line buffer --> full line after the line_ending match
                completed_line = revlinebuf.getvalue()[::-1]  # (may be empty string)
                # Clear the reversed line buffer
                revlinebuf.seek(0)
                revlinebuf.truncate()
                # `grep` if line matches (or behaves like `tac` if match_substr == "")
                if line_offset == 0:
                    if not has_EOF_newline and match_substr in completed_line:
                        # The 0'th line from the end (by definition) cannot get an EOL
                        yield completed_line
                elif match_substr in (completed_line + line_ending):
                    if not strip_eol:
                        completed_line += line_ending
                    yield completed_line
                line_offset += 1
            else:
                # If line_ending not found in chunk then add entire [remaining] chunk,
                # in reverse, onto the reversed line buffer, before chunk_buf is cleared
                revlinebuf.write(chunk_buf.getvalue()[::-1])
            # The LHS of the rightmost line_ending (if any) may contain another line
            # ending so truncate the chunk to that and re-iterate (else clear chunk_buf)
            chunk_buf.seek(len(lhs))
            chunk_buf.truncate()
        last_chunk_start = chunk_start
    if completed_line := revlinebuf.getvalue()[::-1]:
        # Iteration has reached the line at start of file, left over in the line buffer
        if line_offset == 0 and not has_EOF_newline and match_substr in completed_line:
            # The 0'th line from the end (by definition) cannot get an EOL
            yield completed_line
        elif match_substr in (
            completed_line + (line_ending if line_offset > 1 or has_EOF_newline else "")
        ):
            if line_offset == 1:
                if has_EOF_newline and not strip_eol:
                    completed_line += line_ending
            elif not strip_eol:
                completed_line += line_ending
            yield completed_line
    else:
        raise StopIteration

Here's some tests to show it works, with 3 test input files made by counting up to 100 saying 'Hi 0', 'Hi 9', 'Hi 18', ... :

  • ... and give number 27 a double newline
  • ... and give the end of file no newline
  • ... and give the end of file 2 newlines
# Write lines counting to 100 saying 'Hi 0', 'Hi 9', ... give number 27 a double newline
str_out = "".join([f"Hi {i}\n" if i != 27 else f"Hi {i}\n\n" for i in range(0, 100, 9)])
example_file = Path("example.txt")
no_eof_nl_file = Path("no_eof_nl.txt")  # no end of file newline
double_eof_nl_file = Path("double_eof_nl.txt")  # double end of file newline

with open(example_file, "w") as f_out:
    f_out.write(str_out)

with open(no_eof_nl_file, "w") as f_out:
    f_out.write(str_out.rstrip("\n"))

with open(double_eof_nl_file, "w") as f_out:
    f_out.write(str_out + "\n")

file_list = [example_file, no_eof_nl_file, double_eof_nl_file]
labels = [
    "EOF_NL    ",
    "NO_EOF_NL ",
    "DBL_EOF_NL",
]

print("------------------------------------------------------------")
print()
print(f"match_substr = ''")
for label, each_file in zip(labels, file_list):
    with open(each_file, "r") as fh:
        lines_rev_from_iterator = list(grep_backwards(fh=fh, match_substr=""))

    with open(each_file, "r") as fh:
        lines_rev_from_readline = list(reversed(fh.readlines()))

    print(label, f"{lines_rev_from_iterator == lines_rev_from_readline=}")
print()

for label, each_file in zip(labels, file_list):
    with open(each_file, "r") as fh:
        reverse_iterator = grep_backwards(fh=fh, match_substr="")
        first_match = next(reverse_iterator)
    print(label, f"{first_match=}")
print()

for label, each_file in zip(labels, file_list):
    with open(each_file, "r") as fh:
        all_matches = list(grep_backwards(fh=fh, match_substr=""))
    print(label, f"{all_matches=}")
print()
print()
print("------------------------------------------------------------")
print()
print(f"match_substr = 'Hi 9'")

for label, each_file in zip(labels, file_list):
    with open(each_file, "r") as fh:
        reverse_iterator = grep_backwards(fh=fh, match_substr="Hi 9")
        first_match = next(reverse_iterator)
    print(label, f"{first_match=}")
print()

for label, each_file in zip(labels, file_list):
    with open(each_file, "r") as fh:
        all_matches = list(grep_backwards(fh=fh, match_substr="Hi 9"))
    print(label, f"{all_matches=}")
print()
print("------------------------------------------------------------")
print()
print(f"match_substr = '\\n'")

for len_flag in (True, False):
    for label, each_file in zip(labels, file_list):
        with open(each_file, "r") as fh:
            lines_rev_from_iterator = list(grep_backwards(fh=fh, match_substr="\n"))
        if len_flag:
            print(label, f"{len(lines_rev_from_iterator)=}")
        else:
            print(label, f"{lines_rev_from_iterator=}")
    print()

for label, each_file in zip(labels, file_list):
    with open(each_file, "r") as fh:
        reverse_iterator = grep_backwards(fh=fh, match_substr="\n")
        first_match = next(reverse_iterator)
    print(label, f"{first_match=}")
print()

for label, each_file in zip(labels, file_list):
    with open(each_file, "r") as fh:
        all_matches = list(grep_backwards(fh=fh, match_substr="\n"))
    print(label, f"{all_matches=}")
print()
print("------------------------------------------------------------")

------------------------------------------------------------

match_substr = ''
EOF_NL     lines_rev_from_iterator == lines_rev_from_readline=True
NO_EOF_NL  lines_rev_from_iterator == lines_rev_from_readline=True
DBL_EOF_NL lines_rev_from_iterator == lines_rev_from_readline=True

EOF_NL     first_match='Hi 99\n'
NO_EOF_NL  first_match='Hi 99'
DBL_EOF_NL first_match='\n'

EOF_NL     all_matches=['Hi 99\n', 'Hi 90\n', 'Hi 81\n', 'Hi 72\n', 'Hi 63\n', 'Hi 54\n', 'Hi 45\n', 'Hi 36\n', '\n', 'Hi 27\n', 'Hi 18\n', 'Hi 9\n', 'Hi 0\n']
NO_EOF_NL  all_matches=['Hi 99', 'Hi 90\n', 'Hi 81\n', 'Hi 72\n', 'Hi 63\n', 'Hi 54\n', 'Hi 45\n', 'Hi 36\n', '\n', 'Hi 27\n', 'Hi 18\n', 'Hi 9\n', 'Hi 0\n']
DBL_EOF_NL all_matches=['\n', 'Hi 99\n', 'Hi 90\n', 'Hi 81\n', 'Hi 72\n', 'Hi 63\n', 'Hi 54\n', 'Hi 45\n', 'Hi 36\n', '\n', 'Hi 27\n', 'Hi 18\n', 'Hi 9\n', 'Hi 0\n']


------------------------------------------------------------

match_substr = 'Hi 9'
EOF_NL     first_match='Hi 99\n'
NO_EOF_NL  first_match='Hi 99'
DBL_EOF_NL first_match='Hi 99\n'

EOF_NL     all_matches=['Hi 99\n', 'Hi 90\n', 'Hi 9\n']
NO_EOF_NL  all_matches=['Hi 99', 'Hi 90\n', 'Hi 9\n']
DBL_EOF_NL all_matches=['Hi 99\n', 'Hi 90\n', 'Hi 9\n']

------------------------------------------------------------

match_substr = '\n'
EOF_NL     len(lines_rev_from_iterator)=13
NO_EOF_NL  len(lines_rev_from_iterator)=12
DBL_EOF_NL len(lines_rev_from_iterator)=14

EOF_NL     lines_rev_from_iterator=['Hi 99\n', 'Hi 90\n', 'Hi 81\n', 'Hi 72\n', 'Hi 63\n', 'Hi 54\n', 'Hi 45\n', 'Hi 36\n', '\n', 'Hi 27\n', 'Hi 18\n', 'Hi 9\n', 'Hi 0\n']
NO_EOF_NL  lines_rev_from_iterator=['Hi 90\n', 'Hi 81\n', 'Hi 72\n', 'Hi 63\n', 'Hi 54\n', 'Hi 45\n', 'Hi 36\n', '\n', 'Hi 27\n', 'Hi 18\n', 'Hi 9\n', 'Hi 0\n']
DBL_EOF_NL lines_rev_from_iterator=['\n', 'Hi 99\n', 'Hi 90\n', 'Hi 81\n', 'Hi 72\n', 'Hi 63\n', 'Hi 54\n', 'Hi 45\n', 'Hi 36\n', '\n', 'Hi 27\n', 'Hi 18\n', 'Hi 9\n', 'Hi 0\n']

EOF_NL     first_match='Hi 99\n'
NO_EOF_NL  first_match='Hi 90\n'
DBL_EOF_NL first_match='\n'

EOF_NL     all_matches=['Hi 99\n', 'Hi 90\n', 'Hi 81\n', 'Hi 72\n', 'Hi 63\n', 'Hi 54\n', 'Hi 45\n', 'Hi 36\n', '\n', 'Hi 27\n', 'Hi 18\n', 'Hi 9\n', 'Hi 0\n']
NO_EOF_NL  all_matches=['Hi 90\n', 'Hi 81\n', 'Hi 72\n', 'Hi 63\n', 'Hi 54\n', 'Hi 45\n', 'Hi 36\n', '\n', 'Hi 27\n', 'Hi 18\n', 'Hi 9\n', 'Hi 0\n']
DBL_EOF_NL all_matches=['\n', 'Hi 99\n', 'Hi 90\n', 'Hi 81\n', 'Hi 72\n', 'Hi 63\n', 'Hi 54\n', 'Hi 45\n', 'Hi 36\n', '\n', 'Hi 27\n', 'Hi 18\n', 'Hi 9\n', 'Hi 0\n']

------------------------------------------------------------
Louis Maddox
  • 5,226
  • 5
  • 36
  • 66
0
def reverse_lines(filename):
    y=open(filename).readlines()
    return y[::-1]
Remi Guan
  • 21,506
  • 17
  • 64
  • 87
Gareema
  • 27
  • 5
  • Is this not essentially the same solution as the [accepted answer](https://stackoverflow.com/a/2301792/11301900) ? – AMC Jun 26 '20 at 01:11
0

Always use with when working with files as it handles everything for you:

with open('filename', 'r') as f:
    for line in reversed(f.readlines()):
        print line

Or in Python 3:

with open('filename', 'r') as f:
    for line in reversed(list(f.readlines())):
        print(line)
Carlos Afonso
  • 1,927
  • 1
  • 12
  • 22
0

you would need to first open your file in read format, save it to a variable, then open the second file in write format where you would write or append the variable using a the [::-1] slice, completely reversing the file. You can also use readlines() to make it into a list of lines, which you can manipulate

def copy_and_reverse(filename, newfile):
    with open(filename) as file:
        text = file.read()
    with open(newfile, "w") as file2:
        file2.write(text[::-1])
PawlakJ
  • 1
  • 2
0

Most of the answers need to read the whole file before doing anything. This sample reads increasingly large samples from the end.

I only saw Murat Yükselen's answer while writing this answer. It's nearly the same, which I suppose is a good thing. The sample below also deals with \r and increases its buffersize at each step. I also have some unit tests to back this code up.

def readlines_reversed(f):
    """ Iterate over the lines in a file in reverse. The file must be
    open in 'rb' mode. Yields the lines unencoded (as bytes), including the
    newline character. Produces the same result as readlines, but reversed.
    If this is used to reverse the line in a file twice, the result is
    exactly the same.
    """
    head = b""
    f.seek(0, 2)
    t = f.tell()
    buffersize, maxbuffersize = 64, 4096
    while True:
        if t <= 0:
            break
        # Read next block
        buffersize = min(buffersize * 2, maxbuffersize)
        tprev = t
        t = max(0, t - buffersize)
        f.seek(t)
        lines = f.read(tprev - t).splitlines(True)
        # Align to line breaks
        if not lines[-1].endswith((b"\n", b"\r")):
            lines[-1] += head  # current tail is previous head
        elif head == b"\n" and lines[-1].endswith(b"\r"):
            lines[-1] += head  # Keep \r\n together
        elif head:
            lines.append(head)
        head = lines.pop(0)  # can be '\n' (ok)
        # Iterate over current block in reverse
        for line in reversed(lines):
            yield line
    if head:
        yield head
Almar
  • 4,756
  • 2
  • 13
  • 9
0

Read the file line by line and then add it on a list in reverse order.

Here is an example of code :

reverse = []
with open("file.txt", "r") as file:
    for line in file:
        line = line.strip()
         reverse[0:0] = line
Gilles-Antoine Nys
  • 1,481
  • 16
  • 21
willywonka
  • 39
  • 2
  • This just seems like an inferior version of the solution in the [accepted answer](https://stackoverflow.com/a/2301792/11301900). – AMC Jun 26 '20 at 01:12
0
import sys
f = open(sys.argv[1] , 'r')
for line in f.readlines()[::-1]:
    print line
  • Is this not essentially the same solution as the [accepted answer](https://stackoverflow.com/a/2301792/11301900) ? – AMC Jun 26 '20 at 01:12
0
def previous_line(self, opened_file):
        opened_file.seek(0, os.SEEK_END)
        position = opened_file.tell()
        buffer = bytearray()
        while position >= 0:
            opened_file.seek(position)
            position -= 1
            new_byte = opened_file.read(1)
            if new_byte == self.NEW_LINE:
                parsed_string = buffer.decode()
                yield parsed_string
                buffer = bytearray()
            elif new_byte == self.EMPTY_BYTE:
                continue
            else:
                new_byte_array = bytearray(new_byte)
                new_byte_array.extend(buffer)
                buffer = new_byte_array
        yield None

to use:

opened_file = open(filepath, "rb")
iterator = self.previous_line(opened_file)
line = next(iterator) #one step
close(opened_file)
Vyacheslav
  • 26,359
  • 19
  • 112
  • 194
-3

I had to do this some time ago and used the below code. It pipes to the shell. I am afraid i do not have the complete script anymore. If you are on a unixish operating system, you can use "tac", however on e.g. Mac OSX tac command does not work, use tail -r. The below code snippet tests for which platform you're on, and adjusts the command accordingly

# We need a command to reverse the line order of the file. On Linux this
# is 'tac', on OSX it is 'tail -r'
# 'tac' is not supported on osx, 'tail -r' is not supported on linux.

if sys.platform == "darwin":
    command += "|tail -r"
elif sys.platform == "linux2":
    command += "|tac"
else:
    raise EnvironmentError('Platform %s not supported' % sys.platform)
jeorgen
  • 656
  • 5
  • 14
  • The poster is seeking a python answer. – mikemaccana Nov 18 '10 at 11:11
  • Well, it is a Python answer although it seems to be incomplete. – DrDee Mar 26 '11 at 17:00
  • 2
    its not , not crossplatform , using system commands = not pythonic – Phyo Arkar Lwin Dec 04 '11 at 08:31
  • The poster is seeking an answer "using python", which the code snippet is indeed written in. But I agree that is not a very good solution compared to many of the other ones posted. – jeorgen Dec 07 '11 at 23:22
  • 1
    The snippet isn't complete enough to evaluate for correctness (other parts of the invocation aren't shown), but storing shell commands in strings is in and of itself highly suspect -- it's easy to have shell injection bugs unless taking a great deal of care. – Charles Duffy Oct 06 '16 at 21:43