I am having trouble signing Qt Based application un OS X. I am using Qt 5.3.2.
I have read various information source that contain contradictory information.
Here is the content of my application bundle after I run the bin/macdeployqt
Qt utility
SimpleHello.app/
Contents/
Info.plist
PkgInfo
Frameworks/
QtCore.framework/
Resources/
Versions/
5/
QtCore
QtGui.framework/ ... same as Qt core
QtPrintSupport.framework/ ... same as Qt core
QtWidgets.framework/ ... same as Qt core
MacOS/
SimpleHello
PlugIns/ ... some plugins
Resources/
empty.lproj
qt.conf
First:
I tried: http://successfulsoftware.net/2012/08/30/how-to-sign-your-mac-os-x-app-for-gatekeeper/
However, it seems that it is not valid anymore in OS X 10.10 Yosemite
Second:
I tried: Sign a Framework for OSX 10.9
I was able to sign the whole application without any error. However, when running spctl
to verify the validity of the application, I get
spctl -a -vvvv SimpleHello.app
SimpleHello.app/: rejected
source=obsolete resource envelope
origin=Developer ID Application: MY CERTIFICATE
Additionally when verifying signature with codesign, I get this:
codesign --verify --deep --verbose=4 SimpleHello.app
--prepared:/My/Path/SimpleHello.app/Contents/Frameworks/QtCore.framework
--validated:/My/Path/SimpleHello.app/Contents/Frameworks/QtCore.framework
SimpleHello.app/: embedded framework contains modified or invalid version
In subcomponent: /My/Path/SimpleHello.app/Contents/Frameworks/QtCore.framework
Third:
Added the --no-strict
option in codesign verification according to: Error when export archive
It fixes the issue with codesign verification but does not fix the spctl
issue.
Forth:
I tried adding the --no-legacy-signing
option when signing frameworks. However I get this error when verifying the bundle signature (both with codesign
and spctl
codesign --verify --deep --verbose=4 SimpleHello.app
SimpleHello.app/: code has no resources but signature indicates they must be present
Fifth:
Modified the framework structure according to: http://qt-project.org/forums/viewthread/47768 and https://gist.github.com/kingcheez/6154462d7734e0c0f3a4
In this case I get this error when trying to sign frameworks
SimpleHello.app/Contents/Frameworks/QtCore.framework: unsealed contents present in the root directory of an embedded framework
SimpleHello.app/Contents/Frameworks/QtGui.framework: unsealed contents present in the root directory of an embedded framework
SimpleHello.app/Contents/Frameworks/QtPrintSupport.framework: unsealed contents present in the root directory of an embedded framework
SimpleHello.app/Contents/Frameworks/QtWidgets.framework: unsealed contents present in the root directory of an embedded framework
EDIT: It seems that the issue with the unsealed contents present in the root directory of an embedded framework
was because one of the simlink was malformed. It was:
QtCore.framework.framework/Versions/Current -> 5/
Instead of
QtCore.framework.framework/Versions/Current -> 5
After this fix, I still get the same result as in Sixth though.
Sixth:
Added the --no-strict
option when calling codesign
for Frameworks. I was able to sign all frameworks except for one
SimpleHello.app//Contents/Frameworks/QtCore.framework: signed bundle with Mach-O thin (x86_64) [.]
SimpleHello.app//Contents/Frameworks/QtGui.framework: signed bundle with Mach-O thin (x86_64) [.]
SimpleHello.app//Contents/Frameworks/QtPrintSupport.framework: code object is not signed at all
In subcomponent: /My/Path/SimpleHello.app/Contents/Frameworks/QtPrintSupport.framework/Versions/Current/QtPrintSupport
SimpleHello.app//Contents/Frameworks/QtWidgets.framework: signed bundle with Mach-O thin (x86_64) [.]
Seventh:
I posted this question since I don't know what to look for anymore