202

I need to store a double as a string. I know I can use printf if I wanted to display it, but I just want to store it in a string variable so that I can store it in a map later (as the value, not the key).

Bill the Lizard
  • 398,270
  • 210
  • 566
  • 880
  • 2
    Why convert it at all? Store it in the map as a double, and avoid the conversion to and from. – EvilTeach Dec 01 '08 at 22:39
  • I'm storing strings in the map because I have multiple types to validate and store. – Bill the Lizard Dec 01 '08 at 22:53
  • 3
    That still sounds like a call for objects. A union would work. Each the object to insert various values into it, and have it self validate. – EvilTeach Dec 02 '08 at 01:49
  • 2
    I only have a bunch of name/value pairs in a file. It doesn't call for objects. – Bill the Lizard Dec 02 '08 at 02:19
  • 2
    A question to answer your question: why are you storing the double value in a string to store it in a map? Are you going to use the string-ified double as the key? If not, why not leave the double as is? – Matt McClellan Dec 01 '08 at 21:28
  • 1
    Interesting point. Using a double as a map key may fraught with peril, however, as exact comparisons on floating point values always are. Indexing on a string representation avoids the problem. – Fred Larson Dec 01 '08 at 21:50
  • No, the double is going in as the value in a map. I have a bunch of configuration parameters that are of mixed types, and I'm using the map as a convenient place to store them all. – Bill the Lizard Dec 01 '08 at 22:03
  • Using a double as a key, no matter if with or without conversion to string, sounds like a design mistake. A double is fuzzy, but a key needs to be a unique identifier. – Konstantin Schubert Dec 11 '15 at 15:25
  • @Konstantin I wasn't using a double as a key. – Bill the Lizard Dec 11 '15 at 19:38

18 Answers18

233
// The C way:
char buffer[32];
snprintf(buffer, sizeof(buffer), "%g", myDoubleVar);

// The C++03 way:
std::ostringstream sstream;
sstream << myDoubleVar;
std::string varAsString = sstream.str();

// The C++11 way:
std::string varAsString = std::to_string(myDoubleVar);

// The boost way:
std::string varAsString = boost::lexical_cast<std::string>(myDoubleVar);
Adam Rosenfield
  • 390,455
  • 97
  • 512
  • 589
  • 15
    Upvoted for the C++ 11 way. I am new to C++, and didn't realize that there was a `to_string` function. I'm using Microsoft Visual C++ 2013. –  Jan 23 '14 at 14:29
  • 3
    Important note: "std::to_string" has a precision of 6 digits. So the resulting string is basically a float and not a double. – Sheradil Apr 14 '22 at 13:20
197

The boost (tm) way:

std::string str = boost::lexical_cast<std::string>(dbl);

The Standard C++ way:

std::ostringstream strs;
strs << dbl;
std::string str = strs.str();

Note: Don't forget #include <sstream>

Black
  • 18,150
  • 39
  • 158
  • 271
Johannes Schaub - litb
  • 496,577
  • 130
  • 894
  • 1,212
  • 3
    I think boost::lexical_cast pretty much IS the standard C++ way, just nicely packaged for you. BTW, litb, you have a minor typo in there -- "boot:lexical_cast". – Fred Larson Dec 01 '08 at 20:54
  • 2
    boost::lexical_cast is not just a simple wrapper around the stringstream code. Many of the conversion routines are implemented inline. According to the performance measurements on the bottom of this page (http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_47_0/libs/conversion/lexical_cast.htm), boost::lexical_cast is faster than using stringstreams and, in most cases, faster than scanf/printf – Ferruccio Nov 04 '11 at 23:50
  • 1
    @Ferr who said it was a simple wrapper? And thanks for providing the link, I actually *did* think it was more or less a simple wrapper :) – Johannes Schaub - litb Nov 05 '11 at 01:31
  • 30
    don't forget to `#include ` for the c++ way :) – VladL Oct 11 '13 at 14:13
  • 3
    For the sake of documentation, if you don't `#include `, you'll get an error "incomplete type is not allowed." –  Jan 23 '14 at 14:27
  • Will there be a data loss when using this? – jeffry copps Mar 07 '16 at 06:37
  • @jeffrycopps Yes there will in the `ostringstream` version. If you want to represent the double fully enough to round-trip you need to add something like `std::setprecision(std::numeric_limits::max_digits10)` – Jake Cobb Aug 16 '17 at 14:20
146

The Standard C++11 way (if you don't care about the output format):

#include <string>

auto str = std::to_string(42.5); 

to_string is a new library function introduced in N1803 (r0), N1982 (r1) and N2408 (r2) "Simple Numeric Access". There are also the stod function to perform the reverse operation.

If you do want to have a different output format than "%f", use the snprintf or ostringstream methods as illustrated in other answers.

kennytm
  • 510,854
  • 105
  • 1,084
  • 1,005
32

You can use std::to_string in C++11

double d = 3.0;
std::string str = std::to_string(d);
Yochai Timmer
  • 48,127
  • 24
  • 147
  • 185
24

If you use C++, avoid sprintf. It's un-C++y and has several problems. Stringstreams are the method of choice, preferably encapsulated as in Boost.LexicalCast which can be done quite easily:

template <typename T>
std::string to_string(T const& value) {
    stringstream sstr;
    sstr << value;
    return sstr.str();
}

Usage:

string s = to_string(42.5);
Konrad Rudolph
  • 530,221
  • 131
  • 937
  • 1,214
11

sprintf is okay, but in C++, the better, safer, and also slightly slower way of doing the conversion is with stringstream:

#include <sstream>
#include <string>

// In some function:
double d = 453.23;
std::ostringstream os;
os << d;
std::string str = os.str();

You can also use Boost.LexicalCast:

#include <boost/lexical_cast.hpp>
#include <string>

// In some function:
double d = 453.23;
std::string str = boost::lexical_cast<string>(d);

In both instances, str should be "453.23" afterward. LexicalCast has some advantages in that it ensures the transformation is complete. It uses stringstreams internally.

coppro
  • 14,338
  • 5
  • 58
  • 73
10

I would look at the C++ String Toolkit Libary. Just posted a similar answer elsewhere. I have found it very fast and reliable.

#include <strtk.hpp>

double pi = M_PI;
std::string pi_as_string  = strtk::type_to_string<double>( pi );
DannyK
  • 1,342
  • 16
  • 23
6

The problem with lexical_cast is the inability to define precision. Normally if you are converting a double to a string, it is because you want to print it out. If the precision is too much or too little, it would affect your output.

4

You could also use stringstream.

Firas Assaad
  • 25,006
  • 16
  • 61
  • 78
4

Heh, I just wrote this (unrelated to this question):

string temp = "";
stringstream outStream;
double ratio = (currentImage->width*1.0f)/currentImage->height;
outStream << " R: " << ratio;
temp = outStream.str();

/* rest of the code */
Vinko Vrsalovic
  • 330,807
  • 53
  • 334
  • 373
3

Normaly for this operations you have to use the C default ecvt, fcvt or gcvt Functions:

/* gcvt example */
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

main ()
{
  char buffer [20];
  gcvt (1365.249,6,buffer);
  puts (buffer);
  gcvt (1365.249,3,buffer);
  puts (buffer);
  return 0;
}

Output:
1365.25
1.37e+003   

As a Function:

void double_to_char(double f,char * buffer){
  gcvt(f,10,buffer);
}
Ingo
  • 5,239
  • 1
  • 30
  • 24
2

Take a look at sprintf() and family.

bluish
  • 26,356
  • 27
  • 122
  • 180
Darron
  • 21,309
  • 5
  • 49
  • 53
  • 3
    I mentioned printf because googling turned up a bunch of articles that say to convert from a double to a string you use printf. They make the assumption that the only thing you could be doing is printing, which in my case is false. – Bill the Lizard Dec 01 '08 at 21:59
  • why you vote -1? I think sprintf is good. @BilltheLizard, sprint prints something to a char * not screen. Someone answered c method still got a lot of vote. – worldterminator Jun 24 '15 at 05:22
2

You may want to read my prior posting on SO. (Macro'ed version with a temporary ostringstream object.)

For the record: In my own code, I favor snprintf(). With a char array on the local stack, it's not that inefficient. (Well, maybe if you exceeded the array size and looped to do it twice...)

(I've also wrapped it via vsnprintf(). But that costs me some type checking. Yelp if you want the code...)

Community
  • 1
  • 1
Mr.Ree
  • 8,320
  • 27
  • 30
2

Note that a string is just a representation of the double and converting it back to double may not result in the same value. Also note that the default string conversion may trim the conversion to a certain precision. In the standard C++ way, you can control the precision as follows:

#include <sstream>
#include <math.h>
#include <iostream>
#include <iomanip>

int main()
{
    std::ostringstream sout;
    sout << M_PI << '\n';
    sout << std::setprecision(99) << M_PI << '\n';
    sout << std::setprecision(3) << M_PI << '\n';
    sout << std::fixed; //now the setprecision() value will look at the decimal part only.
    sout << std::setprecision(3) << M_PI << '\n';
    std::cout << sout.str();
}

which will give you the output

3.14159                                                                                                                                                                            
3.141592653589793115997963468544185161590576171875                                                                                                                                 
3.14                                                                                                                                                                               
3.142  
Erik Bongers
  • 416
  • 2
  • 10
1

Use to_string().
example :

#include <iostream>   
#include <string>  

using namespace std;
int main ()
{
    string pi = "pi is " + to_string(3.1415926);
    cout<< "pi = "<< pi << endl;

  return 0;
}

run it yourself : http://ideone.com/7ejfaU
These are available as well :

string to_string (int val);
string to_string (long val);
string to_string (long long val);
string to_string (unsigned val);
string to_string (unsigned long val);
string to_string (unsigned long long val);
string to_string (float val);
string to_string (double val);
string to_string (long double val);
Hossein
  • 24,202
  • 35
  • 119
  • 224
0

You could try a more compact style:

std::string number_in_string;

double number_in_double;

std::ostringstream output;

number_in_string = (dynamic_cast< std::ostringstream*>(&(output << number_in_double <<

std::endl)))->str(); 
Zach Saucier
  • 24,871
  • 12
  • 85
  • 147
0

You can convert any thing to anything using this function:

template<class T = std::string, class U>
T to(U a) {
    std::stringstream ss;
    T ret;
    ss << a;
    ss >> ret;
    return ret;
};

usage :

std::string str = to(2.5);
double d = to<double>("2.5");
Sam Mokari
  • 461
  • 3
  • 11
0

C++17 has introduced: std::to_chars, std::to_chars_result - cppreference.com

std::to_chars_result to_chars( char* first, char* last, float       value,
                               std::chars_format fmt, int precision );
std::to_chars_result to_chars( char* first, char* last, double      value,
                               std::chars_format fmt, int precision );
std::to_chars_result to_chars( char* first, char* last, long double value,
                               std::chars_format fmt, int precision );

Which provide fast low level way to convert floating points into string with some level of format control. This should be fast since no allocation is done, only custom implementation for specific scenario should be faster.

C++20 has introduced high level easy to use format string (equivalent of fmt library):

std::format - cppreference.com

std::format

template< class... Args >
std::string format( /*format_string<Args...>*/ fmt, Args&&... args );

template< class... Args >
std::wstring format( /*wformat_string<Args...>*/ fmt, Args&&... args );

template< class... Args >
std::string format( const std::locale& loc,
                    /*format_string<Args...>*/ fmt, Args&&... args );

template< class... Args >
std::wstring format( const std::locale& loc,
                     /*wformat_string<Args...>*/ fmt, Args&&... args );

Which is quite nice and handy. Should be faster then sprintf.

Marek R
  • 32,568
  • 6
  • 55
  • 140