clang is compatible with gcc on this matter. Basically for hello-world program that uses iostream to ensure libstdc++
requirement (actual lib versions may vary between distributions):
$ clang++ test.cpp
$ ldd ./a.out
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffec65c0000)
libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/5.3.0/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00007ff937bb6000)
libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00007ff9378b6000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/5.3.0/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007ff93769e000)
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007ff9372fe000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007ff937f3e000)
Here is a dependency for libstdc++
and libgcc_s
. But if you add -static-libgcc -static-libstdc++
:
$ clang++ test.cpp -static-libgcc -static-libstdc++
$ ldd ./a.out
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffe5d678000)
libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00007fb8e4516000)
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007fb8e4176000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007fb8e4816000)
That still leaves dependency on libc
, but that is a different question.
clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-static-libstdc++'
means clang ignored this flag, because flag is useless in current situation. First two examples that coming to mind is compiling C code (which obviously don't depend on libstdc++), or issuing compile-only command without linking (-c
flag). Since .o
file cannot hold information about static or dynamic linking, this flag have to be specified on linking phase (and, to avoid warning, only on linking phase).