348

How can I access a JSON file in ECMAScript 6?

The following doesn't work:

import config from '../config.json'

This works fine if I try to import a JavaScript file.


https://www.stefanjudis.com/snippets/how-to-import-json-files-in-es-modules-node-js/

ES modules are still reasonably new in Node.js land (they're stable since Node 14). Modules come with a built-in module system, and features such as top-level await.

I read an informative post on ES modules by Pawel Grzybek and learned that you can't import JSON files in ES modules today.

import info from `./package.json` assert { type: `json` };


const { default: info } = await import("./package.json", {
  assert: {
    type: "json",
  },
});

That's a real bummer because I'm pretty used to doing require calls such as const data = require('./some-file.json') in Node.js.

But can you use import assertions in Node.js today?

At the time of writing, the current Node.js LTS (v18.12) still marks import assertions as experimental.

This post explains ways to deal with JSON in ES modules if you don't want to use the experimental feature yet.

Option 1: Read and parse JSON files yourself

The Node.js documentation advises to use the fs module and do the work of reading the files and parsing it yourself.

import { readFile } from 'fs/promises';
const json = JSON.parse(
  await readFile(
    new URL('./some-file.json', import.meta.url)
  )
);

Option 2: Leverage the CommonJS require function to load JSON files

The documentation also states that you can use createRequire to load JSON files. This approach is the way Pawel advises in his blog post.

createRequire allows you to construct a CommonJS require function to use typical CommonJS features such as reading JSON in your Node.js EcmaScript modules.

import { createRequire } from "module";
const require = createRequire(import.meta.url);
const data = require("./data.json");
Martijn Pieters
  • 1,048,767
  • 296
  • 4,058
  • 3,343
Nikita Jajodia
  • 4,220
  • 3
  • 21
  • 29
  • 4
    This has nothing to do with ES6 but with the module loader you are using. The syntax itself is fine. – Felix Kling Jan 22 '16 at 14:40
  • 2
    The cleanest way to do this is to use `webpack` and `json-loader` with it. – suprita shankar Feb 28 '17 at 23:18
  • 25
    ES6 support JSON importing with the following syntax: import * as data from './example.json'; – williamli Jun 13 '18 at 06:57
  • 7
    @williamli That does not work in present-day (2020) browsers unless there's something more going on (e.g. some build step like Babel that rewrites code): e.g. in Chrome one gets *“Failed to load module script: The server responded with a non-JavaScript MIME type of "application/json". Strict MIME type checking is enforced for module scripts per HTML spec.”* (See spec discussions [here](https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/4315) and discussions on [this proposal repo](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-json-modules).) As of now, one needs to use one of the answers below. – ShreevatsaR Sep 21 '20 at 17:31
  • The simple answer is don't. Convert the JSON to JavaScript then save as `.mjs` and import as usual. – Ronnie Royston Jun 27 '23 at 04:29

24 Answers24

244

In TypeScript or using Babel, you can import json file in your code.

// Babel

import * as data from './example.json';
const word = data.name;
console.log(word); // output 'testing'

Reference: https://hackernoon.com/import-json-into-typescript-8d465beded79

Robbendebiene
  • 4,215
  • 3
  • 28
  • 35
williamli
  • 3,846
  • 1
  • 18
  • 30
  • 33
    Just to add to this (typescript json import) you can now simply add this to your tsconfig... { "compilerOptions": { "resolveJsonModule": true } } – Matt Coady Aug 17 '18 at 18:54
  • 7
    Do any browsers support this? I tried this on current FF and get the error `Loading failed for the module with source "example.json"`; on Chrome I get "Failed to load module script: The server responded with a non-JavaScript MIME type of "application/json". Strict MIME type checking is enforced for module scripts per HTML spec." – Coderer Dec 07 '18 at 15:24
  • @Coderer it works on all my browsers. Do you have ES6/ES2015 support enabled? – williamli Dec 18 '18 at 09:22
  • 2
    It just occurred to me, when you say "in ES6" you actually mean "in TS" -- I thought you were talking about the code *emitted* by `tsc` but that's not actually what's happening. I'm trying to run ES6 modules natively on the browser (` – Coderer Dec 20 '18 at 13:28
  • @Coderer i do not know TS and I really meant ES6. I have it working in my ES6 projects via Babble transcribers – williamli Dec 20 '18 at 13:29
  • 8
    When I said "Do any browsers support this," I didn't mean "after you transpile it through Babel." The first article you linked has TS transpiling the `import` statement to a node `require()` (try it!), and the second link says nothing about JSON imports. The problem here is not with the parser or the module system, it's the *loader* -- the browser's loader won't resolve an import for anything other that Javascript. Under the hood, you always have to use an AJAX call (fetch / XHR) and parse the result, even if your build toolchain abstracts that away. – Coderer Dec 20 '18 at 13:40
  • 1
    so that we don't forget as we get excited, what transpilers do is simply inline the json content in a constant in the output file, because in the world of javascript, that is really the only safe way (besides ajaxing which is a different story) – Ayyash Aug 20 '19 at 16:14
165

Importing JSON using ES modules was submitted as feature to TC39 in mid 2020, and is (at the time of this edit) in stage 3, which is the last stage before being accepted in to the spec (see https://github.com/tc39/proposal-json-modules for more details). Once landed, you will be able to use it as:

import someName from "./some/path/to/your/file.json";

Where someName is effectively the name of the variable for the JS object described by the JSON data. (And of course, note that this imports JavaScript from a JSON source, it does not "import JSON").

If you're using a modern enough bundler (like esbuild or the like) or you're using a recent enough transpiler (like babel) then you can already use this syntax without having to worry about support.

Alternatively, if you have the luxury of ownership of JSON files you can also turn your JSON into valid JS files with a minimum of extra code:

config.js

export default
{
  // my json here...
}

then...

import config from '../config.js'

does not allow import of existing .json files, but does a job.

Mike 'Pomax' Kamermans
  • 49,297
  • 16
  • 112
  • 153
Gilbert
  • 3,584
  • 2
  • 26
  • 30
  • 277
    This doesn't actually answer the question. You can't simply convert your package.json into package.js for example. There are times when you want to truly import JSON not JS. – curiousdannii Dec 12 '17 at 01:31
  • 54
    Not a solution at all, you are exporting a javascript object which happens to have the same syntax as JSON. – Ma Jerez Aug 23 '18 at 08:58
  • 3
    Updated the issue text; attempt to avoid further semantical debates. – Gilbert Aug 24 '18 at 09:27
  • I added a `"postbuild": "node myscript.js"` step in my package.json file that uses replace-in-file to do this for me. **myscript.js** ```­ const replace = require('replace-in-file'); const options = { files: '_demo/typedocs/navexReact.td.js', from: /{/, to: 'export default {', }; const convertJsonOutputToJsModule = async () => { try { const changes = await replace(options) console.log('Converted json to module in files:', changes.join(', ')); } catch (error) { console.error('Error occurred:', error); } } convertJsonOutputToJsModule() ``` –  Oct 04 '18 at 18:59
  • 11
    "convert it to JS" is not a solution for how to import a JSON file. That's not JSON file anymore. This is a #1 google result for how to import JSON, and the main answer is to not import JSON. – Jimbo Jonny Dec 17 '19 at 18:56
  • 2
    Having config in `.js` file is more convenient, because you can have comments inside. JSON file does not support this. – user1439838 Apr 08 '21 at 15:50
  • 1
    The syntax in the proposal has changed. – x-yuri Dec 07 '21 at 08:33
94

Unfortunately, ES6/ES2015 doesn't support loading JSON via the module import syntax. But...

There are many ways you can do it. Depending on your needs, you can either look into how to read files in JavaScript (window.FileReader could be an option if you're running in the browser) or use some other loaders as described in other questions (assuming you are using NodeJS).

IMO simplest way is probably to just put the JSON as a JS object into an ES6 module and export it. That way, you can just import it where you need it.

Also, worth noting if you're using Webpack, importing of JSON files will work by default (since webpack >= v2.0.0).

import config from '../config.json';
José dB.
  • 419
  • 6
  • 12
Simone
  • 20,302
  • 14
  • 79
  • 103
  • 7
    There's no need to put it in a String. It's called JSON, not JSSN, after all. – a better oliver Jan 22 '16 at 12:37
  • 4
    Also, torazaburo explained in a previously deleted answer: *There is no ES6 "module system"; there is an API which is implemented by a particular loader. Any loader can do anything it wants, including supporting the import of JSON files. For instance, a loader might choose to support import foo from './directory as meaning to import directory/index.js* – CodingIntrigue Jan 22 '16 at 12:52
  • 5
    in fact ES6/ES2015 do support loading JSON via import syntax: import * as data from './example.json'; – williamli Jun 13 '18 at 07:00
  • +1 for the reminder that webpack does it automatically. Careful though, if you have "test: /.js/" webpack will attempt to compile your json file as JavaScript. #fail. To fix it, change it to say "test: /.js$/" – Rap Jul 28 '18 at 17:35
  • webpack is based on nodejs, isn't it? – Ayyash Aug 20 '19 at 16:11
  • This answer and the comment from @williamli are directly contradictory. Do either of you guys have a link? – Charles Wood Oct 02 '20 at 15:10
  • Ah actually I see there is a slight syntax difference, sorry about that! – Charles Wood Oct 02 '20 at 15:51
39

If you're using node you can:

const fs = require('fs');

const { config } = JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync('../config.json'));

OR

const evaluation = require('../config.json');
// evaluation will then contain all props, so evaluation.config
// or you could use:
const { config } = require('../config.json');

Else:

// config.js
{
// json object here
}

// script.js

import { config } from '../config.js';

OR

import * from '../config.json'
Lee Goddard
  • 10,680
  • 4
  • 46
  • 63
  • 3
    ```const config = JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync('../config.json'));``` worked for me. Node is a mess. – Leif Messinger LOAF Oct 07 '21 at 06:37
  • 2
    I think here ```const { config } = JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync('../config.json'));``` missed param 'utf8', so it should look like this: ```JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync('../package.json', 'utf8')); ``` – Vitaliy Markitanov Dec 30 '21 at 22:10
30

I'm using babel+browserify and I have a JSON file in a directory ./i18n/locale-en.json with translations namespace (to be used with ngTranslate).

Without having to export anything from the JSON file (which btw is not possible), I could make a default import of its content with this syntax:

import translationsJSON from './i18n/locale-en';
Francisco Neto
  • 349
  • 3
  • 3
27

Depending on your build tooling and the data structure within the JSON file, it may require importing the default.

import { default as config } from '../config.json';

e.g. usage within Next.js

Pat Migliaccio
  • 1,031
  • 13
  • 24
  • 3
    Added note for TypeScript is to ensure `resolveJsonModule` is `true` in you `tsconfig.json`. – Pat Migliaccio Oct 08 '19 at 15:18
  • This is the only solution that worked for me when the JSON is an array (the other solution - `import * as data from './example.json'` only worked when the JSON is an object) – Liran H Jan 04 '23 at 11:36
27

Thanks to all the people who proposed and implemented JSON modules and Import Assertions. Since Chrome 91, you can import JSON directly, for example:

// test.json
{
    "hello": "world"
}

// Static Import
import json from "./test.json" assert { type: "json" };
console.log(json.hello);

// Dynamic Import
const { default: json } = await import("./test.json", { assert: { type: "json" } });
console.log(json.hello);

// Dynamic Import
import("./test.json", { assert: { type: "json" } })
  .then(module => console.log(module.default.hello));

Note: other browsers may not yet implement this feature at the moment.

Jackie Han
  • 751
  • 8
  • 6
25

In a browser with fetch (basically all of them now):

At the moment, we can't import files with a JSON mime type, only files with a JavaScript mime type. It might be a feature added in the future (official discussion).

fetch('./file.json')
  .then(response => response.json())
  .then(obj => console.log(obj))

In Node.js v13.2+:

It currently requires the --experimental-json-modules flag, otherwise it isn't supported by default.

Try running

node --input-type module --experimental-json-modules --eval "import obj from './file.json'; console.log(obj)"

and see the obj content outputted to console.

trusktr
  • 44,284
  • 53
  • 191
  • 263
10

A bit late, but I just stumbled across the same problem while trying to provide analytics for my web app that involved sending app version based on the package.json version.

Configuration is as follows: React + Redux, Webpack 3.5.6

The json-loader isn't doing much since Webpack 2+, so after some fiddling with it, I ended up removing it.

The solution that actually worked for me, was simply using fetch. While this will most probably enforce some code changes to adapt to the async approach, it worked perfectly, especially given the fact that fetch will offer json decoding on the fly.

So here it is:

  fetch('../../package.json')
  .then(resp => resp.json())
  .then((packageJson) => {
    console.log(packageJson.version);
  });

Do keep in mind, that since we're talking about package.json specifically here, the file will not usually come bundled in your production build (or even dev for that matter), so you will have to use the CopyWebpackPlugin to have access to it when using fetch.

Avram Tudor
  • 1,468
  • 12
  • 18
  • Can't. Fetch doesn't support local file ... You might be using polyfill or something. – sapy May 15 '18 at 05:58
  • 3
    @sapy Months late reply, but the fetch API most absolutely *does* support loading from paths without specifying the hostname of the server, as well as loading from relative paths. What you are thinking of is loading from `file:///` URLs, which is not what is occurring here. – Jamie Ridding Oct 30 '19 at 09:36
  • 1
    This is a really helpful answer, very simple and worked for me with local files – Joshua Wilkinson Feb 23 '21 at 22:21
5

Simply do this:

import * as importedConfig from '../config.json';

Then use it like the following:

const config = importedConfig.default;
newwebdev
  • 407
  • 2
  • 7
  • 13
  • 3
    This does not work natively in browsers, though it may be working in combination with whatever build system you seem to be using (Babel or whatever). – ShreevatsaR Sep 21 '20 at 17:27
5

Adding to the other answers, in Node.js it is possible to use require to read JSON files even inside ES modules. I found this to be especially useful when reading files inside other packages, because it takes advantage of Node's own module resolution strategy to locate the file.

require in an ES module must be first created with createRequire.

Here is a complete example:

import { createRequire } from 'module';

const require = createRequire(import.meta.url);
const packageJson = require('typescript/package.json');
console.log(`You have TypeScript version ${packageJson.version} installed.`);

In a project with TypeScript installed, the code above will read and print the TypeScript version number from package.json.

GOTO 0
  • 42,323
  • 22
  • 125
  • 158
4

For NodeJS v12 and above, --experimental-json-modules would do the trick, without any help from babel.

https://nodejs.org/docs/latest-v14.x/api/esm.html#esm_experimental_json_modules

But it is imported in commonjs form, so import { a, b } from 'c.json' is not yet supported.

But you can do:

import c from 'c.json';
const { a, b } = c;
aGuegu
  • 1,813
  • 1
  • 21
  • 22
4

import data from "./resource.json” is possible in Chrome 91. JSON modules are now supported. This allows developers to statically import JSON instead of relying on the fetch() function which dynamically retrieves it.

https://www.stefanjudis.com/snippets/how-to-import-json-files-in-es-modules/

Ludovic Aubert
  • 9,534
  • 4
  • 16
  • 28
4

A more elegant solution is to use the CommonJS require function

createRequire construct a CommonJS require function so that you can use typical CommonJS features such as reading JSON

import { createRequire } from "module";
const require = createRequire(import.meta.url);
const data = require("./data.json");
Pascal
  • 2,377
  • 3
  • 25
  • 40
4

import a JSON file in ECMAScript 6

import myJson from './example.json' assert {type: 'json'};
const expample = await import("./example.json", {
  assert: {
    type: "json",
  },
});
Sergey
  • 418
  • 1
  • 7
  • 21
3

importing JSON files are still experimental. It can be supported via the below flag.

--experimental-json-modules

otherwise you can load your JSON file relative to import.meta.url with fs directly:-

import { readFile } from 'fs/promises';
const config = JSON.parse(await readFile(new URL('../config.json', import.meta.url)));

you can also use module.createRequire()

import { createRequire } from 'module';
const require = createRequire(import.meta.url);
const config = require('../config.json');
azad
  • 31
  • 1
3

Dynamic import

const {default: json} = await import("./name.json", {
  assert: {
    type: "json",
  },
});

import

import {default: json} from './name.json' assert {type: 'json'}

CommonJS require

const json = require('./name.json')

Additional Information

If you use Typescript

Set compilerOptions.resolveJsonModule to true in your tsconfig.json

{
  "compilerOptions": {
    "resolveJsonModule": true
  }
}
FreePhoenix888
  • 4,510
  • 3
  • 13
  • 22
2

I used it installing the plugin "babel-plugin-inline-json-import" and then in .balberc add the plugin.

  1. Install plugin

    npm install --save-dev babel-plugin-inline-json-import

  2. Config plugin in babelrc

    "plugin": [ "inline-json-import" ]

And this is the code where I use it

import es from './es.json'
import en from './en.json'

export const dictionary = { es, en }
Ramsés López
  • 461
  • 7
  • 8
2

I'm using

  • vuejs, version: 2.6.12
  • vuex, version: 3.6.0
  • vuex-i18n, version: 1.13.1.

My solution is:

messages.js:

import Vue from 'vue'
import Vuex from 'vuex';
import vuexI18n from 'vuex-i18n';
import translationsPl from './messages_pl'
import translationsEn from './messages_en'

Vue.use(Vuex);

export const messages = new Vuex.Store();

Vue.use(vuexI18n.plugin, messages);

Vue.i18n.add('en', translationsEn);
Vue.i18n.add('pl', translationsPl);

Vue.i18n.set('pl');

messages_pl.json:

{
    "loadingSpinner.text:"Ładowanie..."
}

messages_en.json:

{
    "loadingSpinner.default.text":"Loading..."
}

majn.js

import {messages} from './i18n/messages'
Vue.use(messages);
Piotr Żak
  • 2,083
  • 6
  • 29
  • 42
2

let filePath = '../../data/my-file.json'

let arrayImport = await import(filePath, {
  assert: { type: "json" },
});
const inputArray = arrayImport.default 

console.log('result', inputArray)

More information here: v8 - Dynamic import().

Tiago Bértolo
  • 3,874
  • 3
  • 35
  • 53
2

Make sure the type attribute is set to module because we are using the ES6 Modules syntax.

And here is how we would import a JSON file in our index.js file.

import myJson from './example.json' assert {type: 'json'};
Sergey
  • 418
  • 1
  • 7
  • 21
1

https://www.stefanjudis.com/snippets/how-to-import-json-files-in-es-modules-node-js/

ES modules are still reasonably new in Node.js land (they're stable since Node 14). Modules come with a built-in module system, and features such as top-level await.

I read an informative post on ES modules by Pawel Grzybek and learned that you can't import JSON files in ES modules today.

import info from `./package.json` assert { type: `json` };


const { default: info } = await import("./package.json", {
  assert: {
    type: "json",
  },
});

That's a real bummer because I'm pretty used to doing require calls such as const data = require('./some-file.json') in Node.js.

But can you use import assertions in Node.js today?

At the time of writing, the current Node.js LTS (v18.12) still marks import assertions as experimental.

This post explains ways to deal with JSON in ES modules if you don't want to use the experimental feature yet.

Option 1: Read and parse JSON files yourself

The Node.js documentation advises to use the fs module and do the work of reading the files and parsing it yourself.

import { readFile } from 'fs/promises';
const json = JSON.parse(
  await readFile(
    new URL('./some-file.json', import.meta.url)
  )
);

Option 2: Leverage the CommonJS require function to load JSON files

The documentation also states that you can use createRequire to load JSON files. This approach is the way Pawel advises in his blog post.

createRequire allows you to construct a CommonJS require function to use typical CommonJS features such as reading JSON in your Node.js EcmaScript modules.

import { createRequire } from "module";
const require = createRequire(import.meta.url);
const data = require("./data.json");
0

As said by Azad, the correct answer is to load the file with fs.readFileSync() (or any of the asynchronous variants such as fs.readFile with callback or fs.promises.readFile with promises/await, then parse the JSON with JSON.parse()

const packageJsonRaw = fs.readFileSync('location/to/package.json' ) 
const packageJson = JSON.parse(packageJsonRaw )

Webpack/Babel options are not practical unless you are already using that set up.

-1

The file structure with the json extension is used to transfer data, the json file data can be retrieved locally by sending a request using the fetch command.

In the following example, the data of the count.json file is received

// count.json

fetch("./count.json") 
.then((response) => { return response.json(); }) 
.then((data) => console.log(data));
meysam
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
    Your answer could be improved with additional supporting information. Please [edit] to add further details, such as citations or documentation, so that others can confirm that your answer is correct. You can find more information on how to write good answers [in the help center](/help/how-to-answer). – Community Mar 04 '22 at 14:14
  • See "[Explaining entirely code-based answers](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/392712/128421)". While this might be technically correct, it doesn't explain why it solves the problem or should be the selected answer. We should educate along with helping solve the problem. – the Tin Man Mar 22 '22 at 04:55
  • @theTinMan Thank you for your attention, I will explain this answer. You are right The answers should be educational – meysam Mar 26 '22 at 11:59