The main difference between TestCase
and TransactionTestCase
is that TestCase
wraps the tests with atomic()
blocks ALL THE TIME. From the documentation:
Wraps the tests within two nested atomic() blocks: one for the whole class and one for each test
Now imagine that you have a method that should raise an error if it is not wrapped inside atomic()
block. You are trying to write a test for that:
def test_your_method_raises_error_without_atomic_block(self):
with self.assertRaises(SomeError):
your_method()
This test will unexpectedly fail! The reason is, you guessed it, TestCase
wraps the tests with atomic()
blocks ALL THE TIME. Thus, your_method()
will not raise an error, which is why this test will fail. In this case, you should use TransactionTestCase to make your test pass.
select_for_update() is a clear case in point:
Evaluating a queryset with select_for_update() in autocommit mode on backends which support SELECT ... FOR UPDATE is a TransactionManagementError error
From the TransactionTestCase documentation:
with TestCase class, you cannot test that a block of code is executing within a transaction, as is required when using select_for_update()
And if we take a look at the documentation of select_for_update()
, we see a warning:
Although select_for_update() normally fails in autocommit mode, since TestCase automatically wraps each test in a transaction, calling select_for_update() in a TestCase even outside an atomic() block will (perhaps unexpectedly) pass without raising a TransactionManagementError. To properly test select_for_update() you should use TransactionTestCase.
Hope it helps!