108

I am trying to create a table in MySQL with two foreign keys, which reference the primary keys in 2 other tables, but I am getting an errno: 150 error and it will not create the table.

Here is the SQL for all 3 tables:

CREATE TABLE role_groups (
  `role_group_id` int(11) NOT NULL `AUTO_INCREMENT`,
  `name` varchar(20),
  `description` varchar(200),
  PRIMARY KEY (`role_group_id`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB;

CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `roles` (
  `role_id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `name` varchar(50),
  `description` varchar(200),
  PRIMARY KEY (`role_id`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB;

create table role_map (
  `role_map_id` int not null `auto_increment`,
  `role_id` int not null,
  `role_group_id` int not null,
  primary key(`role_map_id`),
  foreign key(`role_id`) references roles(`role_id`),
  foreign key(`role_group_id`) references role_groups(`role_group_id`)
) engine=InnoDB;
philipxy
  • 14,867
  • 6
  • 39
  • 83
  • 1
    Could you post the error output and tell us which command (of the three) is causing the error? – dave Sep 21 '09 at 23:08
  • 6
    What's with the back-ticks around `auto_increment`? That's not valid. Auto_increment is a keyword, not an identifier. – Bill Karwin Sep 21 '09 at 23:39

20 Answers20

263

These conditions must be satisfied to not get error 150 re ALTER TABLE ADD FOREIGN KEY:

  1. The Parent table must exist before you define a foreign key to reference it. You must define the tables in the right order: Parent table first, then the Child table. If both tables references each other, you must create one table without FK constraints, then create the second table, then add the FK constraint to the first table with ALTER TABLE.

  2. The two tables must both support foreign key constraints, i.e. ENGINE=InnoDB. Other storage engines silently ignore foreign key definitions, so they return no error or warning, but the FK constraint is not saved.

  3. The referenced columns in the Parent table must be the left-most columns of a key. Best if the key in the Parent is PRIMARY KEY or UNIQUE KEY.

  4. The FK definition must reference the PK column(s) in the same order as the PK definition. For example, if the FK REFERENCES Parent(a,b,c) then the Parent's PK must not be defined on columns in order (a,c,b).

  5. The PK column(s) in the Parent table must be the same data type as the FK column(s) in the Child table. For example, if a PK column in the Parent table is UNSIGNED, be sure to define UNSIGNED for the corresponding column in the Child table field.

    Exception: length of strings may be different. For example, VARCHAR(10) can reference VARCHAR(20) or vice versa.

  6. Any string-type FK column(s) must have the same character set and collation as the corresponding PK column(s).

  7. If there is data already in the Child table, every value in the FK column(s) must match a value in the Parent table PK column(s). Check this with a query like:

     SELECT COUNT(*) FROM Child LEFT OUTER JOIN Parent ON Child.FK = Parent.PK 
     WHERE Parent.PK IS NULL;
    

    This must return zero (0) unmatched values. Obviously, this query is an generic example; you must substitute your table names and column names.

  8. Neither the Parent table nor the Child table can be a TEMPORARY table.

  9. Neither the Parent table nor the Child table can be a PARTITIONED table.

  10. If you declare a FK with the ON DELETE SET NULL option, then the FK column(s) must be nullable.

  11. If you declare a constraint name for a foreign key, the constraint name must be unique in the whole schema, not only in the table in which the constraint is defined. Two tables may not have their own constraint with the same name.

  12. If there are any other FK's in other tables pointing at the same field you are attempting to create the new FK for, and they are malformed (i.e. different collation), they will need to be made consistent first. This may be a result of past changes where SET FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS = 0; was utilized with an inconsistent relationship defined by mistake. See @andrewdotn's answer below for instructions on how to identify these problem FK's.

philipxy
  • 14,867
  • 6
  • 39
  • 83
marv-el
  • 2,631
  • 1
  • 14
  • 2
  • 4
    one more thing worth adding: if the PK of the parent table is more than one field, the order of the fields in the FK must be the same as the order in the PK – Kip May 09 '12 at 20:44
  • 1
    This definitely helped me track down the real problem. My table name was all uppercase and the reference portion of the FK referred to the table in lowercase. (Not directly mentioned but I was systematically checked that the PK and FK information was the same. – purgatory101 Apr 08 '13 at 15:37
  • 28
    This includes things like `int(11) unsigned NOT NULL` vs `int(11) NOT NULL`. – Glen Solsberry May 01 '13 at 20:37
  • 4
    ALTER TABLE table_name ENGINE=InnoDB; – TolMera Jul 24 '13 at 03:15
  • 12
    If the table is defined ENGINE=MyISAM it doesn't generate errno 150 because it *ignores* foreign key declarations. It's like saying the best way to avoid trouble with your automobile engine is to drive a boat. :-) – Bill Karwin Oct 11 '13 at 17:18
  • One difference in data types is allowed: the length of strings. E.g. VARCHAR(10) can reference VARCHAR(20) and vice versa. – Bill Karwin Oct 11 '13 at 17:19
  • 2
    Also, if your CONSTRAINT's `ON DELETE` rule is `SET NULL` make sure the foreign key can actually be NULL! I spent 30 minutes reading this answer over and over, making sure my tables met the conditions but still getting Error 150. Then I noticed my FK was a NOT NULL field meaning the rule was impossible to apply. – Martin Joiner Jan 16 '15 at 17:02
  • In addition: for varchars: the target column must have a unique constraint. – Ralph May 14 '15 at 14:43
  • Did help, but FYI tables do not have to be same charset. – Steven McElveen May 23 '15 at 18:50
  • My problem is solved by item 3. I forgot to add UNSIGN to the foreign key – freeman May 30 '15 at 07:18
  • Another condition : If composite primary keys & a mapping table are involved, then the order in which columns are listed in the foreign key index should be same as that in the primary key index. – Rohit Jun 05 '15 at 04:22
  • Please note if setting a "onDelete SET NULL" you also need to make sure the PK column has to allow for a NULL value. – Luceos Mar 30 '16 at 19:42
  • 1
    I would like to add one more point with reference to answer above. that is the index type of parent table must be "unique index" and must be not null. – Dila Gurung Jun 15 '16 at 11:43
  • This also includes not using ON DELETE SET NULL on fields where NULL values are disallowed, thanks SHOW ENGINE INNODB STATUS. – siliconrockstar May 25 '17 at 01:05
  • I was facing a similar problem, having a column as int(x) and other as Bigint(x+10), solved by setting both as int(x), thanks! – TheGabiRod Nov 20 '19 at 20:44
  • What I found, especially for a composite key, is that the parent table needs to at least have a matching index, but doesn't necessarily need to be the primary key. – jgreep Apr 17 '21 at 05:48
66

MySQL’s generic “errno 150” message “means that a foreign key constraint was not correctly formed.” As you probably already know if you are reading this page, the generic “errno: 150” error message is really unhelpful. However:

You can get the actual error message by running SHOW ENGINE INNODB STATUS; and then looking for LATEST FOREIGN KEY ERROR in the output.

For example, this attempt to create a foreign key constraint:

CREATE TABLE t1
(id INTEGER);

CREATE TABLE t2
(t1_id INTEGER,
 CONSTRAINT FOREIGN KEY (t1_id) REFERENCES t1 (id));

fails with the error Can't create table 'test.t2' (errno: 150). That doesn’t tell anyone anything useful other than that it’s a foreign key problem. But run SHOW ENGINE INNODB STATUS; and it will say:

------------------------
LATEST FOREIGN KEY ERROR
------------------------
130811 23:36:38 Error in foreign key constraint of table test/t2:
FOREIGN KEY (t1_id) REFERENCES t1 (id)):
Cannot find an index in the referenced table where the
referenced columns appear as the first columns, or column types
in the table and the referenced table do not match for constraint.

It says that the problem is it can’t find an index. SHOW INDEX FROM t1 shows that there aren’t any indexes at all for table t1. Fix that by, say, defining a primary key on t1, and the foreign key constraint will be created successfully.

andrewdotn
  • 32,721
  • 10
  • 101
  • 130
  • 4
    `SHOW ENGINE INNODB STATUS` helped me immediately identify a problem I'd been trying to diagnose for nearly an hour. Thanks. – jatrim Aug 29 '14 at 00:09
  • In my case, this indicated that a totally different table that FK'd the same field I was attempting to point to was inconsistent and so would not save the new one... assuming this was from using `SET FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS = 0;` during an import/alteration that was malformed at one time or another. Big help, thanks. – oucil Apr 07 '19 at 15:51
27

Make sure that the properties of the two fields you are trying to link with a constraint are exactly the same.

Often, the 'unsigned' property on an ID column will catch you out.

ALTER TABLE `dbname`.`tablename` CHANGE `fieldname` `fieldname` int(10) UNSIGNED NULL;
Jon Winstanley
  • 23,010
  • 22
  • 73
  • 116
  • In my experience, it's worth using MySQL's SHOW CREATE TABLE on your main table to check exactly what flags are set against your main index column, then copy them to your foreign key column. There might be things there, like "unsigned" that aren't obvious. – Ambulare Sep 29 '14 at 16:09
11

What's the current state of your database when you run this script? Is it completely empty? Your SQL runs fine for me when creating a database from scratch, but errno 150 usually has to do with dropping & recreating tables that are part of a foreign key. I'm getting the feeling you're not working with a 100% fresh and new database.

If you're erroring out when "source"-ing your SQL file, you should be able to run the command "SHOW ENGINE INNODB STATUS" from the MySQL prompt immediately after the "source" command to see more detailed error info.

You may want to check out the manual entry too:

If you re-create a table that was dropped, it must have a definition that conforms to the foreign key constraints referencing it. It must have the right column names and types, and it must have indexes on the referenced keys, as stated earlier. If these are not satisfied, MySQL returns error number 1005 and refers to error 150 in the error message. If MySQL reports an error number 1005 from a CREATE TABLE statement, and the error message refers to error 150, table creation failed because a foreign key constraint was not correctly formed.

MySQL 5.1 reference manual.

Brent Writes Code
  • 19,075
  • 7
  • 52
  • 56
6

For people who are viewing this thread with the same problem:

There are a lot of reasons for getting errors like this. For a fairly complete list of causes and solutions of foreign key errors in MySQL (including those discussed here), check out this link:

MySQL Foreign Key Errors and Errno 150

juacala
  • 2,155
  • 1
  • 21
  • 22
5

For others that find this SO entry via Google: Be sure that you aren't trying to do a SET NULL action on a foreign key (to be) column defined as "NOT NULL." That caused great frustration until I remembered to do a CHECK ENGINE INNODB STATUS.

Eric L.
  • 3,232
  • 2
  • 22
  • 20
4

Definitely it is not the case but I found this mistake pretty common and unobvious. The target of a FOREIGN KEY could be not PRIMARY KEY. Te answer which become useful for me is:

A FOREIGN KEY always must be pointed to a PRIMARY KEY true field of other table.

CREATE TABLE users(
   id INT AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY,
   username VARCHAR(40));

CREATE TABLE userroles(
   id INT AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY,
   user_id INT NOT NULL,
   FOREIGN KEY(user_id) REFERENCES users(id));
I159
  • 29,741
  • 31
  • 97
  • 132
4

As pointed by @andrewdotn the best way is to see the detailed error(SHOW ENGINE INNODB STATUS;) instead of just an error code.

One of the reasons could be that an index already exists with the same name, may be in another table. As a practice, I recommend prefixing table name before the index name to avoid such collisions. e.g. instead of idx_userId use idx_userActionMapping_userId.

MuchMore
  • 168
  • 1
  • 4
4

Please make sure at first that

  1. you are using InnoDB tables.
  2. field for FOREIGN KEY has the same type and length (!) as source field.

I had the same trouble and I've fixed it. I had unsigned INT for one field and just integer for other field.

Inzimam Tariq IT
  • 6,548
  • 8
  • 42
  • 69
Juljan
  • 2,391
  • 1
  • 17
  • 20
3

Helpful tip, use SHOW WARNINGS; after trying your CREATE query and you will receive the error as well as the more detailed warning:

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Level   | Code | Message                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
+---------+------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------                          --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                          ---------------+
| Warning |  150 | Create table 'fakeDatabase/exampleTable' with foreign key constraint failed. There is no index in the referenced table where the referenced columns appear as the first columns.
|
| Error   | 1005 | Can't create table 'exampleTable' (errno:150)                                                                                                                                                                           |
+---------+------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------                          --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                          ---------------+

So in this case, time to re-create my table!

sturrockad
  • 4,460
  • 2
  • 19
  • 19
2

This is usually happening when you try to source file into existing database. Drop all the tables first (or the DB itself). And then source file with SET foreign_key_checks = 0; at the beginning and SET foreign_key_checks = 1; at the end.

wholenewstrain
  • 199
  • 1
  • 8
2

I've found another reason this fails... case sensitive table names.

For this table definition

CREATE TABLE user (
  userId int PRIMARY KEY AUTO_INCREMENT,
  username varchar(30) NOT NULL
) ENGINE=InnoDB;

This table definition works

CREATE TABLE product (
  id int PRIMARY KEY AUTO_INCREMENT,
  userId int,
  FOREIGN KEY fkProductUser1(userId) REFERENCES **u**ser(userId)
) ENGINE=InnoDB;

whereas this one fails

CREATE TABLE product (
  id int PRIMARY KEY AUTO_INCREMENT,
  userId int,
  FOREIGN KEY fkProductUser1(userId) REFERENCES User(userId)
) ENGINE=InnoDB;

The fact that it worked on Windows and failed on Unix took me a couple of hours to figure out. Hope that helps someone else.

Tim
  • 616
  • 7
  • 23
2

MySQL Workbench 6.3 for Mac OS.

Problem: errno 150 on table X when trying to do Forward Engineering on a DB diagram, 20 out of 21 succeeded, 1 failed. If FKs on table X were deleted, the error moved to a different table that wasn't failing before.

Changed all tables engine to myISAM and it worked just fine.

enter image description here

Community
  • 1
  • 1
Eduardo Chongkan
  • 752
  • 7
  • 12
1

Also worth checking that you aren't accidentally operating on the wrong database. This error will occur if the foreign table does not exist. Why does MySQL have to be so cryptic?

SystemParadox
  • 8,203
  • 5
  • 49
  • 57
1

Make sure that the foreign keys are not listed as unique in the parent. I had this same problem and I solved it by demarcating it as not unique.

Raza
  • 3,147
  • 2
  • 31
  • 35
1

In my case it was due to the fact that the field that was a foreign key field had a too long name, ie. foreign key (some_other_table_with_long_name_id). Try sth shorter. Error message is a bit misleading in that case.

Also, as @Jon mentioned earlier - field definitions have to be the same (watch out for unsigned subtype).

Kangur
  • 7,823
  • 3
  • 30
  • 32
1

When the foreign key constraint is based on varchar type, then in addition to the list provided by marv-el the target column must have an unique constraint.

jww
  • 97,681
  • 90
  • 411
  • 885
Ralph
  • 118,862
  • 56
  • 287
  • 383
1

(Side notes too big for a Comment)

There is no need for an AUTO_INCREMENT id in a mapping table; get rid of it.

Change the PRIMARY KEY to (role_id, role_group_id) (in either order). This will make accesses faster.

Since you probably want to map both directions, also add an INDEX with those two columns in the opposite order. (There is no need to make it UNIQUE.)

More tips: http://mysql.rjweb.org/doc.php/index_cookbook_mysql#speeding_up_wp_postmeta

Rick James
  • 135,179
  • 13
  • 127
  • 222
1

execute below line before creating table : SET FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS = 0;

FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS option specifies whether or not to check foreign key constraints for InnoDB tables.

-- Specify to check foreign key constraints (this is the default)

SET FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS = 1;

 

-- Do not check foreign key constraints

SET FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS = 0;

When to Use : Temporarily disabling referential constraints (set FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS to 0) is useful when you need to re-create the tables and load data in any parent-child order

user11949964
  • 141
  • 1
  • 3
0

I encountered the same problem, but I check find that I hadn't the parent table. So I just edit the parent migration in front of the child migration. Just do it.

韩向飞
  • 69
  • 5