174

How can I add a delay to a program in C#?

JasonMArcher
  • 14,195
  • 22
  • 56
  • 52
Mulder
  • 1,913
  • 2
  • 13
  • 7
  • 3
    There are several ways of doing this, but *why* do you need to add a delay? If we knew then we'd be able to suggest the most appropriate way to do it. – ChrisF Mar 27 '11 at 14:47
  • 4
    This question is hopelessly under-documented to ever recommend Thread.Sleep(). – Hans Passant Mar 27 '11 at 14:47
  • 2
    Just for clarification, I voted to close this question because you haven't provided enough detail for anyone to give a good, quality answer. I'm perfectly willing to reopen it as a valid question if you add some more detail on exactly what you're trying to do. Voting to close early is a way of preventing a flood of "noise" answers to poor quality questions. Once you've added more detail, leave me a comment and/or flag a mod to get it reopened. – Cody Gray - on strike Mar 27 '11 at 16:02
  • Thanks, it's okay, problem already solved – Mulder Mar 29 '11 at 18:52
  • 30
    Bad decision to close this question. It IS a question, and it is ok for it to be generic in nature. I understood it perfectly. – user2430797 Nov 17 '17 at 05:00
  • 9
    Yet another question I was searching for, answered by a question that was closed for no reason. – Glenn Maynard Nov 02 '18 at 22:03
  • 1
    [This is why this question needs to be re-opened](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5449956/how-to-add-a-delay-for-a-2-or-3-seconds#comment51463756_5449962). It's now out of date but no one can add an up to date answer as it's closed. – Liam Oct 12 '20 at 12:31
  • Let's reopen... – ZygD Feb 14 '21 at 20:27

4 Answers4

225

You could use Thread.Sleep() function, e.g.

int milliseconds = 2000;
Thread.Sleep(milliseconds);

that completely stops the execution of the current thread for 2 seconds.

Probably the most appropriate scenario for Thread.Sleep is when you want to delay the operations in another thread, different from the main e.g. :

 MAIN THREAD        --------------------------------------------------------->
 (UI, CONSOLE ETC.)      |                                      |
                         |                                      |
 OTHER THREAD            ----- ADD A DELAY (Thread.Sleep) ------>

For other scenarios (e.g. starting operations after some time etc.) check Cody's answer.

digEmAll
  • 56,430
  • 9
  • 115
  • 140
  • 15
    Avoid using Thead.Sleep cause It will completely block the current Thread from doing ANYTHING till the duration ends. – Mohammed Swillam Mar 27 '11 at 14:59
  • 9
    @Mohammed: yes, of course it will completely block the tread. But sometimes it can be useful... it really depends on what the OP needs... – digEmAll Mar 27 '11 at 15:07
  • 18
    Since I can't post a new answer, I'd like to comment -- If you don't want it to block the program, you can use `await Task.Delay(milliseconds)`. This worked for me :) – SaiyanGirl Aug 01 '15 at 20:25
  • In my case I couldn't use await because I was called from a part of the programm that is written by someone else. It is not awaitable but if I "hang" I can work for 10 seconds before my stuff is shut down. Sleeping 2 secs works like a charm ;) So in some cases this is the way. – ecth Jan 19 '16 at 13:11
  • @MohammedElSayed : The answer is depends. It all depends on the intention of the use. As for my case, I need to sleep the thread for 0.6 seconds precisely in order to avoid an index constrain when inserting into the database. – GunWanderer Apr 19 '18 at 16:48
94

Use a timer with an interval set to 2–3 seconds.

You have three different options to choose from, depending on which type of application you're writing:

  1. System.Timers.Timer
  2. System.Windows.Forms.Timer
  3. System.Threading.Timer

Don't use Thread.Sleep if your application need to process any inputs on that thread at the same time (WinForms, WPF), as Sleep will completely lock up the thread and prevent it from processing other messages. Assuming a single-threaded application (as most are), your entire application will stop responding, rather than just delaying an operation as you probably intended. Note that it may be fine to use Sleep in pure console application as there are no "events" to handle or on separate thread (also Task.Delay is better option).

In addition to timers and Sleep you can use Task.Delay which is asynchronous version of Sleep that does not block thread from processing events (if used properly - don't turn it into infinite sleep with .Wait()).

 public async void ClickHandler(...)
 {
      // whatever you need to do before delay goes here         

      await Task.Delay(2000);

      // whatever you need to do after delay.
 }

The same await Task.Delay(2000) can be used in a Main method of a console application if you use C# 7.1 (Async main on MSDN blogs).

Note: delaying operation with Sleep has benefit of avoiding race conditions that comes from potentially starting multiple operations with timers/Delay. Unfortunately freezing UI-based application is not acceptable so you need to think about what will happen if you start multiple delays (i.e. if it is triggered by a button click) - consider disabling such button, or canceling the timer/task or making sure delayed operation can be done multiple times safely.

Alexei Levenkov
  • 98,904
  • 14
  • 127
  • 179
Cody Gray - on strike
  • 239,200
  • 50
  • 490
  • 574
  • 7
    If it is a console application, the `Thread.Sleep` warning may not be as important. – Merlyn Morgan-Graham Mar 27 '11 at 14:54
  • 1
    There is a 4th timer: [System.Web.UI.Timer](https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.web.ui.timer.aspx), an ASP.NET component that performs asynchronous or synchronous web page postbacks at a regular interval. – David Sep 28 '16 at 13:49
  • 1
    Should be top answer. If this had an example for using one of the timers, it would get more votes... – Mercutio Sep 17 '18 at 23:05
  • Cody Gray, can you add `await Task.Delay()` version and inline comment that console app actually likely *want* to use `Sleep` (non-async `Main`) or `Delay` (async `Main`) – Alexei Levenkov Dec 18 '19 at 07:39
  • To be honest, this is no longer my expertise, @Alexei. I haven't touched C# or .NET in...5 years? I haven't kept up with the latest developments. I don't know anything about `async`. Please feel free to edit the answer if you are confident in your ability to improve it. – Cody Gray - on strike Dec 18 '19 at 07:52
45

For 2.3 seconds you should do:

System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(2300);
Community
  • 1
  • 1
Mitja Bonca
  • 4,268
  • 5
  • 24
  • 30
7
System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(
    (int)System.TimeSpan.FromSeconds(3).TotalMilliseconds);

Or with using statements:

Thread.Sleep((int)TimeSpan.FromSeconds(2).TotalMilliseconds);

I prefer this to 1000 * numSeconds (or simply 3000) because it makes it more obvious what is going on to someone who hasn't used Thread.Sleep before. It better documents your intent.

Merlyn Morgan-Graham
  • 58,163
  • 16
  • 128
  • 183