48

I am getting an a Circular Reference Serialization Error although, to my knowledge I do not have any circular references. I am retrieving a set of Orders from the database and sending them to the client as JSON. All the code is shown below.

This is the error:

Error

A circular reference was detected while serializing an object of type 'System.Data.Entity.DynamicProxies.Order_83CECF2AA4DE38232F9077D4B26941AB96BC61230419EA8AC42C9100E6072812'. Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.

Exception Details: System.InvalidOperationException: A circular reference was detected while serializing an object of type 'System.Data.Entity.DynamicProxies.Order_83CECF2AA4DE38232F9077D4B26941AB96BC61230419EA8AC42C9100E6072812'.

Source Error:

An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below.

My classes are as follows:

Order

public class Order
{
    [Key]
    public int OrderId { get; set; }

    public int PatientId { get; set; }
    public virtual Patient Patient { get; set; }

    public int CertificationPeriodId { get; set; }
    public virtual CertificationPeriod CertificationPeriod { get; set; }

    public int AgencyId { get; set; }
    public virtual Agency Agency { get; set; }

    public int PrimaryDiagnosisId { get; set; }
    public virtual Diagnosis PrimaryDiagnosis { get; set; }

    public int ApprovalStatusId { get; set; }
    public virtual OrderApprovalStatus ApprovalStatus { get; set; }

    public int ApproverId { get; set; }
    public virtual User Approver { get; set; }

    public int SubmitterId { get; set; }
    public virtual User Submitter { get; set; }

    public DateTime ApprovalDate { get; set; }

    public DateTime SubmittedDate { get; set; }
    public Boolean IsDeprecated { get; set; }
}

Patient

public class Patient
{
    [Key]
    public int PatientId { get; set; }
    public string FirstName { get; set; }
    public string LastName { get; set; }
    public string MiddleInitial { get; set; }
    public bool IsMale;
    public DateTime DateOfBirth { get; set; }

    public int PatientAddressId { get; set; }
    public Address PatientAddress { get; set; }

    public bool IsDeprecated { get; set; }
}

Certification Period

public class CertificationPeriod
{
    [Key]
    public int CertificationPeriodId { get; set; }
    public DateTime startDate { get; set; }
    public DateTime endDate { get; set; }
    public bool isDeprecated { get; set; }
}

Agency

public class Agency
{
    [Key]
    public int AgencyId { get; set; }
    public string Name { get; set; }

    public int PatientAddressId { get; set; }
    public virtual Address Address { get; set; }
}

Diagnosis

public class Diagnosis
{
    [Key]
    public int DiagnosisId { get; set; }
    public string Icd9Code { get; set; }
    public string Description { get; set; }
    public DateTime DateOfDiagnosis { get; set; }
    public string Onset { get; set; }
    public string Details { get; set; }
}

OrderApprovalStatus

public class OrderApprovalStatus
{
    [Key]
    public int OrderApprovalStatusId { get; set; }
    public string Status { get; set; }
}

User

public class User
{
    [Key]
    public int UserId { get; set; }
    public string Login { get; set; }
    public string FirstName { get; set; }
    public string LastName { get; set; }
    public string NPI { get; set; }
    public string Email { get; set; }

}

NOTE: ADDRESS CLASS IS NEW ADDITION DURING EDIT

Address

public class Address
{
    [Key]
    public int AddressId { get; set; }
    public string StreetAddress { get; set; }
    public string City { get; set; }
    public string State { get; set; }
    public string Zip { get; set; }
    public string Phone { get; set; }
    public string Title { get; set; }
    public string Label { get; set; }
}

The code that executes the serialization is here:

Excerpt from OrderController

    public ActionResult GetAll()
    {
        return Json(ppEFContext.Orders, JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet);
    }

Thanks

Paul Sasik
  • 79,492
  • 20
  • 149
  • 189
Guido Anselmi
  • 3,872
  • 8
  • 35
  • 58

11 Answers11

50

You could try to remove the virtual keyword from all navigation properties to disable lazy loading and proxy creation and then use eager loading instead to load the required object graph explicitely:

public ActionResult GetAll()
{
    return Json(ppEFContext.Orders
                           .Include(o => o.Patient)
                           .Include(o => o.Patient.PatientAddress)
                           .Include(o => o.CertificationPeriod)
                           .Include(o => o.Agency)
                           .Include(o => o.Agency.Address)
                           .Include(o => o.PrimaryDiagnosis)
                           .Include(o => o.ApprovalStatus)
                           .Include(o => o.Approver)
                           .Include(o => o.Submitter),
        JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet);
}

Referring to your previous post it looks like your application isn't relying on lazy loading anyway because you introduced there the virtual properties to load the object graph lazily, possibly causing now the serialization trouble.

Edit

It's not necessary to remove the virtual keyword from the navigation properties (which would make lazy loading completely impossible for the model). It's enough to disable proxy creation (which disables lazy loading as well) for the specific circumstances where proxies are disturbing, like serialization:

ppEFContext.Configuration.ProxyCreationEnabled = false;

This disables proxy creation only for the specific context instance ppEFContext.

(I've just seen, @WillC already mentioned it here. Upvote for this edit please to his answer.)

Community
  • 1
  • 1
Slauma
  • 175,098
  • 59
  • 401
  • 420
  • @Slauma: Thanks! That worked. What exactly is happening with all of those .Include statements? – Guido Anselmi Apr 07 '11 at 23:39
  • It causes to load all the related entities when the query is executed. You can find a little tutorial about the different options to load related entities here: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/adonet/archive/2011/01/31/using-dbcontext-in-ef-feature-ctp5-part-6-loading-related-entities.aspx. It is part of this series on EF 4.1: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/adonet/archive/2011/01/27/using-dbcontext-in-ef-feature-ctp5-part-1-introduction-and-model.aspx – Slauma Apr 07 '11 at 23:49
  • 1
    Was the `Include()` method removed from the 4.1 release? The version I have wants a `string` as parameter. – Yuck May 23 '11 at 19:35
  • 1
    @Yuck: No, it's not removed. You need a reference to `EntityFramework.dll` assembly in your project and `using System.Data.Entity;` as namespace, then you should have the overload with the lambda expression. – Slauma May 23 '11 at 19:45
  • Thank you. I hate extension methods for this reason. – Yuck May 23 '11 at 19:48
44

When you know that you need to serialize from a particular context, you can disable proxy creation for that particular query like below. This has worked for me and is better than revising my model classes.

using (var context = new MeContext())
{
    context.Configuration.ProxyCreationEnabled = false;
    return context.cars.Where(w => w.Brand == "Ferrari")
}

This approach takes away the proxy object type for this particular instance of the context so the returned objects are the actual class and therefore serialization is not a problem.

ie:

{Models.car} 

instead of

{System.Data.Entity.DynamicProxies.car_231710A36F27E54BC6CE99BB50E0FE3B6BD4462EC‌​A19695CD1BABB79605296EB} 
WillC
  • 1,761
  • 17
  • 37
10

The problem is that your are actually serializing an entity framework generated proxy object. Unfortunatly this has some issues when used with the JSON serializer. You might consider to map your entities to special simple POCO classes for the sake of JSON compatibility.

Christoph
  • 26,519
  • 28
  • 95
  • 133
8

There is an attribute to add to Entity Framework objects

[ScriptIgnore]

This makes the code not perform Circular references.

bdparrish
  • 3,216
  • 3
  • 37
  • 58
  • 1
    This did not prevent my circular reference problem, BUT is did allow me to remove attributes from the serialization that I didn't want to return in my API. Thanks! – Jimmy Bosse Oct 05 '12 at 15:20
7

I think they have fixed this in the latest version.

Check out the help docs under the section "Serializing and Deserializing JSON -> Serialization and Preserving Object References".

Set this setting when initializing the JSON.Net Serializer:

PreserveReferencesHandling = PreserveReferencesHandling.Objects;

So an example would be this:

var serializerSettings = new JsonSerializerSettings { PreserveReferencesHandling = PreserveReferencesHandling.Objects };

string json = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(people, Formatting.Indented, serializerSettings);

I verified that this works with my code first solution, and a circular reference in the navigation properties. If you look at the resulting JSON it should have "$id" and "$ref" properties everywhere.

John B
  • 20,062
  • 35
  • 120
  • 170
  • 1
    Wrote a blog post on the subject: Wrote a blog post on the subject: http://www.johnnycode.com/blog/2012/04/10/serializing-circular-references-with-json-net-and-entity-framework/ – John B Apr 10 '12 at 18:37
6

An alternative solution would be to use anonymous types as the result of a LINQ query.

In my project, I am using lazy loading extensively, and disabling it was not the right thing to do.

p.campbell
  • 98,673
  • 67
  • 256
  • 322
abdelkarim
  • 586
  • 6
  • 11
3

An alternative solution, if only some values from objects are necessary, is build an anonymous class and return it, like the example below:

public JsonResult AjaxFindByName(string term)
{
    var customers = context.Customers
        .Where(c => c.Name.ToUpper().Contains(term.ToUpper())).Take(10)
        .AsEnumerable()
        .Select(c => new { 
            value = c.Name, 
            SSN = String.Format(@"{0:000\-00\-0000}", c.SSN),
            CustomerID = c.CustomerID });

    return Json(customers, JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet);
}
Leonel Sanches da Silva
  • 6,972
  • 9
  • 46
  • 66
  • 1
    Useful suggestion. I am setting navigational properties (that are cyclic) to null before setting the return value of the ASP.Net Web Api method. – nzsai Jan 20 '20 at 07:54
2

The circular reference happens because you use eager loading on the object.

You have a couple of methods:

  • Turn off eager loading when your loading your Query (linq or lambda) DbContext.Configuration.ProxyCreationEnabled = false;
  • Remove the virtual keyword from the Domainmodel
  • Detach the objects (= no eager loading functionality & no proxy)
    • Repository.Detach(entityObject)
    • DbContext.Entry(entityObject).EntityState = EntityState.Detached
  • Clone the properties
    • You could use something like AutoMapper to clone the object, don't use the ICloneable interface, because it also clones the ProxyProperties in the object, so that won't work.
  • In case you are building an API, try using a separte project with a different configuration (that doesn't return proxies)

PS. Proxies is the object that's created by EF when you load it from the Entity Framework. In short: It means that it holds the original values and updated values so they can be updated later. It handles other things to ;-)

NicoJuicy
  • 3,435
  • 4
  • 40
  • 66
0

You can remove the virtual keyword:

public virtual Patient Patient { get; set; } -> public Patient Patient { get; set; }

Keep in mind that when you remove the virtual keyword, lazy loading will be turned off.

Jack
  • 10,943
  • 13
  • 50
  • 65
Reza Abolfathi
  • 3,061
  • 2
  • 18
  • 14
0

I was able to solve this problem by using the method described here:

http://mytechworld.officeacuity.com/index.php/2010/02/serializing-entity-framework-objects-into-json-using-asp-net-mvc/

steveareeno
  • 1,925
  • 5
  • 39
  • 59
  • 1
    Link is dead. This is why it is frowned upon to do link-only answers. You should always quote/re-iterate the important parts of the link. – Shelby115 Sep 22 '15 at 18:37
0

For those using the proxy EF/Linq2SQL classes my solution was to simply remove the parent reference on my child entities.

So in my model, I selected the relationship and changed the Parent reference to be Internal rather than Public.

May not be an ideal solution for all, but worked for me.

Anthony Main
  • 6,039
  • 12
  • 64
  • 89