In a SQL query on Oracle 10g, I need to determine whether a string is numeric or not. How can I do this?
-
3http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0::::P11_QUESTION_ID:1132906300346063525 – Paolo Falabella Apr 14 '11 at 17:19
7 Answers
You can use REGEXP_LIKE:
SELECT 1 FROM DUAL
WHERE REGEXP_LIKE('23.9', '^\d+(\.\d+)?$', '')

- 81,493
- 19
- 133
- 134
-
I like this solution, but it doesn't match numbers that have multiple digits before the decimal point. e.g. (43, 43.6) – AndrewL Apr 14 '11 at 17:28
-
-
4
-
-1, 1.2E10, etc. A function with TO_NUMBER is probably the only safe way to do this. – Jon Heller Apr 14 '11 at 23:40
-
@jonearles: Can you please run this query and let me know what's the result? SELECT TO_NUMBER('344.8888O') FROM DUAL; – Chandu Apr 15 '11 at 01:34
-
@Cybernate: I meant a PL/SQL function that uses TO_NUMBER. As much as I hate adding PL/SQL functions to a query, I think in this case it's the only way to get the maximum functionality. – Jon Heller Apr 15 '11 at 02:42
-
@jonearles: Well I hate using exception to drive a function return value for something like number validation. – Chandu Apr 15 '11 at 02:45
-
@jonearles: TO_NUMBER is not safe as server can have another decimal symbol for NLS_NUMERIC_CHARACTERS than client's OS. – LoBo Mar 30 '12 at 15:19
-
@LoBo You'll be fine if you change the client's session parameters. (Functions use the session paramters, not the parameters used when they were created.) – Jon Heller Apr 02 '12 at 20:06
You ca try this:
SELECT LENGTH(TRIM(TRANSLATE(string1, ' +-.0123456789', ' '))) FROM DUAL
where string1 is what you're evaluating. It will return null if numeric. Look here for further clarification

- 57,693
- 12
- 90
- 123
-
6Be aware that this considers a string like '123+45' or '123.45.67.89' to be a valid number. – Justin Cave Apr 14 '11 at 17:31
-
Thanks @Adrian , you gave me an idea on how to test if a string contains a number by combining translate and decode tegether – Ahmad Jan 29 '12 at 05:14
As pointed out by Tom Kyte in http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/apex/f?p=100:11:0::::P11_QUESTION_ID:7466996200346537833, if you're using the built-in TO_NUMBER
in a user defined function, you may need a bit of extra trickery to make it work.
FUNCTION is_number(x IN VARCHAR2)
RETURN NUMBER
IS
PROCEDURE check_number (y IN NUMBER)
IS
BEGIN
NULL;
END;
BEGIN
PRAGMA INLINE(check_number, 'No');
check_number(TO_NUMBER(x);
RETURN 1;
EXCEPTION
WHEN INVALID_NUMBER
THEN RETURN 0;
END is_number;
The problem is that the optimizing compiler may recognize that the result of the TO_NUMBER
is not used anywhere and optimize it away.
Says Tom (his example was about dates rather then numbers):
the disabling of function inlining will make it do the call to check_date HAS to be made as a function call - making it so that the DATE has to be pushed onto the call stack. There is no chance for the optimizing compiler to remove the call to to_date in this case. If the call to to_date needed for the call to check_date fails for any reason, we know that the string input was not convertible by that date format.

- 3,926
- 2
- 28
- 49
I don't have access to a 10G instance for testing, but this works in 9i:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION is_numeric (p_val VARCHAR2) RETURN NUMBER IS v_val NUMBER; BEGIN BEGIN IF p_val IS NULL OR TRIM (p_val) = '' THEN RETURN 0; END IF; SELECT TO_NUMBER (p_val) INTO v_val FROM DUAL; RETURN 1; EXCEPTION WHEN OTHERS THEN RETURN 0; END; END; SELECT is_numeric ('333.5') is_numeric FROM DUAL;
I have assumed you want nulls/empties treated as FALSE.

- 2,524
- 2
- 22
- 34
Here is a method to determine numeric that can be part of a simple query, without creating a function. Accounts for embedded spaces, +- not the first character, or a second decimal point.
var v_test varchar2(20);
EXEC :v_test := ' -24.9 ';
select
(case when trim(:v_test) is null then 'N' ELSE -- only banks, or null
(case when instr(trim(:v_test),'+',2,1) > 0 then 'N' ELSE -- + sign not first char
(case when instr(trim(:v_test),'-',2,1) > 0 then 'N' ELSE -- - sign not first char
(case when instr(trim(:v_test),' ',1,1) > 0 then 'N' ELSE -- internal spaces
(case when instr(trim(:v_test),'.',1,2) > 0 then 'N' ELSE -- second decimal point
(case when LENGTH(TRIM(TRANSLATE(:v_test, ' +-.0123456789',' '))) is not null then 'N' ELSE -- only valid numeric charcters.
'Y'
END)END)END)END)END)END) as is_numeric
from dual;

- 11
I found that the solution
LENGTH(TRIM(TRANSLATE(string1, ' +-.0123456789', ' '))) is null
allows embedded blanks ... it accepts "123 45 6789" which for my purpose is not a number.
Another level of trim/translate corrects this. The following will detect a string field containing consecutive digits with leading or trailing blanks such that to_number(trim(string1)) will not fail
LENGTH(TRIM(TRANSLATE(translate(trim(string1),' ','X'), '0123456789', ' '))) is null

- 1,729
- 1
- 11
- 5
-
That's because you included the space character at the beginning of the second parameter to TRANSLATE. If you remove the space before the +, is will not allow spaces in the strings. – TheChrisPratt Mar 04 '17 at 00:05
For integers you can use the below. The first translate changes spaces to be a character and the second changes numbers to be spaces. The Trim will then return null if only numbers exist.
TRIM(TRANSLATE(TRANSLATE(TRIM('1 2 3d 4'), ' ','@'),'0123456789',' ')) is null

- 380
- 4
- 11