I am trying to create springdoc
swagger documentation, and I would like to represent a request body having data type Map<String, Object>
in a better readable way for clients. But when I declare @io.swagger.v3.oas.annotations.parameters.RequestBody(content = @Content(schema = @Schema(implementation = Map.class)
the Schema is coming as String
(attached the screenshot below)
Method declaration
@Operation(security = {@SecurityRequirement(name = "bearer-key")}, summary = "Create Data", operationId = "createData", description = "Create createData for the **`type`**. ")
@ApiResponses(value = {
@ApiResponse(responseCode = "201", description = "Data created", content = @Content(schema = @Schema(implementation = Map.class),
examples = {@ExampleObject(value = "{\n" +
" \"id\": \"927d810c-3ac5-4584-ba58-7c11befabf54\",\n" +
"}")})),
@ApiResponse(responseCode = "400", description = "BAD Request")})
@PostMapping(value = "/data/type", produces = APPLICATION_JSON_VALUE, consumes = APPLICATION_JSON_VALUE)
@io.swagger.v3.oas.annotations.parameters.RequestBody(content = @Content(schema = @Schema(implementation = Map.class),
examples = {@ExampleObject(value = "{\n" +
" \"label\":\"tourism\",\n" +
" \"location\":\"France\"\n" +
" }")}))
ResponseEntity<Map<String, Object>> createData(@Parameter(name = "type", required = true) @PathVariable("type") String type, @Parameter(name = "request payload") @Valid @RequestBody Map<String, Object> body);
Though the Spring boot automatically infers the type based on the method signature, it is not clear for the data type Map
. For instance, by default, the type Map<String, Object> will be inferred as below
But I would like to show the Schema in a more understandable way for the client who refers to my API. I could see there is a closed ticket without a proper solution in Github. As per my requirement, the request body should be a type agnostic and dynamic key-value pairs, so there is no other way apart from receiving the request as Map<String, Object>
. has anyone implemented a better way with type Map
rather than creating a custom request/response model?