16

I had a private repo for 6 months that I worked on. Today I finally made it public after submitting a paper. Is it possible to make the activity (those green square) visible? I tried clicking on contribution setting and got the message Visitors will now see your public and anonymized private contributions, but the activity still doesn't show.

Update 1:

I noticed that only changes I did on GitHub (the website rather than pushing code from my machine) were recorded. That is, only the readme file shows as I often updated it on the website.

Update 2:

I ran git --no-pager log -s --format="%ae" to see which emails were used for the commits and got the following: Some emails are the primary email under GitHub, some are of the form 43555163+Penguin@users.noreply.github.com, some are Penguin@Penguin-MacBook-Pro.local, some are Penguin@econ2-204-32-dhcp.int.university_name.edu.

Also, as I mentioned in one of the comments below, if I go to my repo and specifically look at commits I can see something like: Penguin authored and Penguin committed on May 27 1 parent 1d71ac3 commit cb95c2870de67383ee653849b4c7b40a062f5fd3. But this does not show on my activity.

Lastly, some comments mentioned creating a new repo on GitHub and pushing my previous commits (after filtering the emails somehow which I didn't quite understand). However, I already have several Stargazers on this repo and would like to keep them. By making a new repo I believe these will disappear.

Update 3:

I used git filter-repo to change all the emails to my primary email and now all my previous commits emails appear to be my primary email when I call git --no-pager log -s --format="%ae". However, I still don't see the activity showing. For example, if I go to my repo I can see that one of the commits says Penguin authored and Penguin committed on Apr 8, but this doesn't show in the activity.

Penguin
  • 1,923
  • 3
  • 21
  • 51

3 Answers3

9

I noticed that only changes I did on github (the website rather than pushing code from my machine) were recorded.

That means you need to check, from within your local folder of your cloned repository:

git config user.name
git config user.email

Make sure those match your GitHub user account, and GitHub user email.
Then make some new commits, and push: see if the activity is reflected then.

The OP Penguin confirms in the comments:

Looks like the email wasn't the same (for some reason the email was empty in my local machine).

Now I can push commits through my local machine and they appear as activities.

Is there a way to show my previous commits though?

For that, you need to rewrite your past commit, and force push the result (which is OK if you are the only one working on that repository).

See How to switch GitHub account and retrospectively update commit history? for an example, using git filter-repo (with a mailmap map), or git filter-repo --commit-callback.

Which I don't quite understand. If I'll create a new repo and push everything to it I will lose the stargazers

You would not create a new remote repository, only clone it in a new local cloned repo, and apply git filter-repo there.

Once the local history matches what you expect in terms of commit authorship, you force push back to the original remote repository (with all its Stargazers).

git push --force # at least for the main/master branch

From the discussion

I think git push --force worked. I still see the commits on the commit page as not verified, but the activities appear now.
Is that a problem that they are not verified?

And now it appears that whenever I try to push a commit from my local machine I need to authenticate for some reason

The remote authentication is different from commit authorship and verification.

The verified aspect is due to a lack of commit signature, as mentioned here.
You would need to resign your commits locally (still using git filter-repo), and force push them again.
Once signed (with a key registered to your GitHub profile), they would appear as verified.

The git push with authentication depends on which protocol you are using (HTTPS or SSH), as recently (Nov. 2021 at the time of writing) explained by torek in "Easy way to switch between accounts on git in the terminal on Windows?".

ErikMD
  • 13,377
  • 3
  • 35
  • 71
VonC
  • 1,262,500
  • 529
  • 4,410
  • 5,250
  • Looks like the email wasn't the same (for some reason the email was empty in my local machine). Now I can push commits through my local machine and they appear as activities. Is there a way to show my previous commits though? – Penguin Oct 16 '21 at 20:16
  • @Penguin OK. I have edited the answer to address your comment. – VonC Oct 16 '21 at 20:23
  • Isn't it simpler to associate the 'other' email with the main account (via account settings)? That should alleviate the need for a history rewrite. – Dirk Eddelbuettel Oct 16 '21 at 20:27
  • @DirkEddelbuettel Yes, if you associate it as primary email address through: https://docs.github.com/en/account-and-profile/setting-up-and-managing-your-github-user-account/managing-email-preferences/adding-an-email-address-to-your-github-account – VonC Oct 16 '21 at 20:33
  • I didn't quite understand the last part. I already had a "primary" email account on github and none attached to my local machine. I added the same primary account so now that I write `git config user.email` I see the same email. How do I associate it? – Penguin Oct 16 '21 at 20:37
  • @Penguin what do you see for the past commits which are not part of the activity? ``? – VonC Oct 16 '21 at 20:50
  • What do you mean? Where should I look to see the past commits if not under "Contribution activity"? If I go to my repo and specifically look at commits (not sure if that's what you mean), I can see something like: `Penguin authored and Penguin committed on May 27 1 parent 1d71ac3 commit cb95c2870de67383ee653849b4c7b40a062f5fd3`. But this does not show on my activity – Penguin Oct 16 '21 at 21:11
  • @Penguin Try this git log (https://stackoverflow.com/a/32169107/6309) to check what email was associated with those commits – VonC Oct 16 '21 at 21:29
  • Some are the primary email under github, some are of the form `43555163+Penguin@users.noreply.github.com`, some are `Penguin@Penguin-MacBook-Pro.local`, some are `Penguin@econ2-204-32-dhcp.int.university_name.edu` – Penguin Oct 16 '21 at 21:34
  • Let us [continue this discussion in chat](https://chat.stackoverflow.com/rooms/238231/discussion-between-vonc-and-penguin). – VonC Oct 16 '21 at 21:36
  • FWIW, here is another link related to @VonC's last remark on `git filter-branch`: [How to change the author and committer name and e-mail of multiple commits in Git?](https://stackoverflow.com/a/61368365/9164010), with a snippet that does not require setting up a mailmap (albeit I agree that having a mailmap file, even just for this question use case, is better :) – ErikMD Oct 27 '21 at 19:41
  • 1
    @ErikMD Thank you. I have added that link to the answer, for more visibility. – VonC Oct 27 '21 at 19:57
  • My only concern with some of these methods is that they require me to clone the repo and then push everything to it, which as I mentioned in my update 2 will most likely remove the stargazers that I wish to keep. The 2 `filter repo` options seem like they might work, but it also says "Note: It is strongly recommended to try filter-repo tool on a fresh clone". Which I don't quite understand. If I'll create a new repo and push everything to it I will lose the stargazers – Penguin Nov 02 '21 at 15:39
  • @Penguin "creating a new repo on GitHub": my answer does not advocate for the creation of a new remote repo on GitHub. I have edited it to make that clear. No Stargazers left behind! – VonC Nov 02 '21 at 15:48
  • @VonC Please see my latest update – Penguin Nov 02 '21 at 17:01
  • @Penguin Please use the discussion: it is made to avoid cluttering the comments: https://chat.stackoverflow.com/rooms/238231/discussion-between-vonc-and-penguin – VonC Nov 02 '21 at 19:40
  • @VonC I've just edited your answer to fix what looked like a typo to me (feel free to revert if you disagree). – ErikMD Nov 14 '21 at 16:24
  • @ErikMD Looking good. Thank you for the edit. Much appreciated. – VonC Nov 14 '21 at 16:25
2

This likely has to with you not having signed off the commits with GPG -
which leads to commits, which are not labeled as (identity) "verified".

The documentation also doesn't cover this case, at least not in detail ... while the most easy might be to create a new one repository, add it as remote and then you can push all the changes. And even when the edits you've made are not publicly visible, GitHub still is your third party witness.

Martin Zeitler
  • 1
  • 19
  • 155
  • 216
1

Contributions should still be shown in that case. Here are some of the reasons your contributions might not be being shown:

  • GitHub isn't aware of the email address you used in your commit messages

  • The commit wasn't made in the default or gh-pages branch

  • The repo is a forked repo, not a standalone repo

GitHub also mentions that it will not show commits that were made less than 24 hours ago, so it seems like they have some sort of caching mechanism going on with their contribution graph. It may help to wait 24 hours since you made the repo public, to ensure that cache has a chance to roll over.

Maximillian Laumeister
  • 19,884
  • 8
  • 59
  • 78
  • Got it, thanks. I'll wait 24 hours and we'll see. I don't think it's the other 3 since I do see some commits (like creating the readme file in April or updating it in September once) – Penguin Oct 11 '21 at 22:53
  • 1
    Still nothing after 24 hours. You can see my update maybe it will help – Penguin Oct 12 '21 at 23:57