What is the difference between:
some_list1 = []
some_list1.append("something")
and
some_list2 = []
some_list2 += ["something"]
What is the difference between:
some_list1 = []
some_list1.append("something")
and
some_list2 = []
some_list2 += ["something"]
For your case the only difference is performance: append is twice as fast.
Python 3.0 (r30:67507, Dec 3 2008, 20:14:27) [MSC v.1500 32 bit (Intel)] on win32
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import timeit
>>> timeit.Timer('s.append("something")', 's = []').timeit()
0.20177424499999999
>>> timeit.Timer('s += ["something"]', 's = []').timeit()
0.41192320500000079
Python 2.5.1 (r251:54863, Apr 18 2007, 08:51:08) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] on win32
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import timeit
>>> timeit.Timer('s.append("something")', 's = []').timeit()
0.23079359499999999
>>> timeit.Timer('s += ["something"]', 's = []').timeit()
0.44208112500000141
In general case append
will add one item to the list, while +=
will copy all elements of right-hand-side list into the left-hand-side list.
Update: perf analysis
Comparing bytecodes we can assume that append
version wastes cycles in LOAD_ATTR
+ CALL_FUNCTION
, and += version -- in BUILD_LIST
. Apparently BUILD_LIST
outweighs LOAD_ATTR
+ CALL_FUNCTION
.
>>> import dis
>>> dis.dis(compile("s = []; s.append('spam')", '', 'exec'))
1 0 BUILD_LIST 0
3 STORE_NAME 0 (s)
6 LOAD_NAME 0 (s)
9 LOAD_ATTR 1 (append)
12 LOAD_CONST 0 ('spam')
15 CALL_FUNCTION 1
18 POP_TOP
19 LOAD_CONST 1 (None)
22 RETURN_VALUE
>>> dis.dis(compile("s = []; s += ['spam']", '', 'exec'))
1 0 BUILD_LIST 0
3 STORE_NAME 0 (s)
6 LOAD_NAME 0 (s)
9 LOAD_CONST 0 ('spam')
12 BUILD_LIST 1
15 INPLACE_ADD
16 STORE_NAME 0 (s)
19 LOAD_CONST 1 (None)
22 RETURN_VALUE
We can improve performance even more by removing LOAD_ATTR
overhead:
>>> timeit.Timer('a("something")', 's = []; a = s.append').timeit()
0.15924410999923566
>>> a=[]
>>> a.append([1,2])
>>> a
[[1, 2]]
>>> a=[]
>>> a+=[1,2]
>>> a
[1, 2]
See that append adds a single element to the list, which may be anything. +=[]
joins the lists.
In the example you gave, there is no difference, in terms of output, between append
and +=
. But there is a difference between append
and +
(which the question originally asked about).
>>> a = []
>>> id(a)
11814312
>>> a.append("hello")
>>> id(a)
11814312
>>> b = []
>>> id(b)
11828720
>>> c = b + ["hello"]
>>> id(c)
11833752
>>> b += ["hello"]
>>> id(b)
11828720
As you can see, append
and +=
have the same result; they add the item to the list, without producing a new list. Using +
adds the two lists and produces a new list.
+= is an assignment. When you use it you're really saying ‘some_list2= some_list2+['something']’. Assignments involve rebinding, so:
l= []
def a1(x):
l.append(x) # works
def a2(x):
l= l+[x] # assign to l, makes l local
# so attempt to read l for addition gives UnboundLocalError
def a3(x):
l+= [x] # fails for the same reason
The += operator should also normally create a new list object like list+list normally does:
>>> l1= []
>>> l2= l1
>>> l1.append('x')
>>> l1 is l2
True
>>> l1= l1+['x']
>>> l1 is l2
False
However in reality:
>>> l2= l1
>>> l1+= ['x']
>>> l1 is l2
True
This is because Python lists implement __iadd__() to make a += augmented assignment short-circuit and call list.extend() instead. (It's a bit of a strange wart this: it usually does what you meant, but for confusing reasons.)
In general, if you're appending/extended an existing list, and you want to keep the reference to the same list (instead of making a new one), it's best to be explicit and stick with the append()/extend() methods.
some_list2 += ["something"]
is actually
some_list2.extend(["something"])
for one value, there is no difference. Documentation states, that:
s.append(x)
same ass[len(s):len(s)] = [x]
s.extend(x)
same ass[len(s):len(s)] = x
Thus obviously s.append(x)
is same as s.extend([x])
The difference is that concatenate will flatten the resulting list, whereas append will keep the levels intact:
So for example with:
myList = [ ]
listA = [1,2,3]
listB = ["a","b","c"]
Using append, you end up with a list of lists:
>> myList.append(listA)
>> myList.append(listB)
>> myList
[[1,2,3],['a','b','c']]
Using concatenate instead, you end up with a flat list:
>> myList += listA + listB
>> myList
[1,2,3,"a","b","c"]
The performance tests here are not correct:
append
vs. +=[]
a number of times, you should declare append
as a local function.e.g.
timeit.Timer('for i in xrange(100): app(i)', 's = [] ; app = s.append').timeit()
Good tests can be found here: Python list append vs. +=[]
In addition to the aspects described in the other answers, append and +[] have very different behaviors when you're trying to build a list of lists.
>>> list1=[[1,2],[3,4]]
>>> list2=[5,6]
>>> list3=list1+list2
>>> list3
[[1, 2], [3, 4], 5, 6]
>>> list1.append(list2)
>>> list1
[[1, 2], [3, 4], [5, 6]]
list1+['5','6'] adds '5' and '6' to the list1 as individual elements. list1.append(['5','6']) adds the list ['5','6'] to the list1 as a single element.
The rebinding behaviour mentioned in other answers does matter in certain circumstances:
>>> a = ([],[])
>>> a[0].append(1)
>>> a
([1], [])
>>> a[1] += [1]
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<interactive input>", line 1, in <module>
TypeError: 'tuple' object does not support item assignment
That's because augmented assignment always rebinds, even if the object was mutated in-place. The rebinding here happens to be a[1] = *mutated list*
, which doesn't work for tuples.
As of today and Python 3.6, the results provided by @Constantine are no longer the same.
Python 3.6.10 |Anaconda, Inc.| (default, May 8 2020, 02:54:21)
[GCC 7.3.0] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import timeit
>>> timeit.Timer('s.append("something")', 's = []').timeit()
0.0447923709944007
>>> timeit.Timer('s += ["something"]', 's = []').timeit()
0.04335783299757168
It seems that append
and +=
now have an equal performance, whereas the compilation differences haven't changed at all:
>>> import dis
>>> dis.dis(compile("s = []; s.append('spam')", '', 'exec'))
1 0 BUILD_LIST 0
2 STORE_NAME 0 (s)
4 LOAD_NAME 0 (s)
6 LOAD_ATTR 1 (append)
8 LOAD_CONST 0 ('spam')
10 CALL_FUNCTION 1
12 POP_TOP
14 LOAD_CONST 1 (None)
16 RETURN_VALUE
>>> dis.dis(compile("s = []; s += ['spam']", '', 'exec'))
1 0 BUILD_LIST 0
2 STORE_NAME 0 (s)
4 LOAD_NAME 0 (s)
6 LOAD_CONST 0 ('spam')
8 BUILD_LIST 1
10 INPLACE_ADD
12 STORE_NAME 0 (s)
14 LOAD_CONST 1 (None)
16 RETURN_VALUE
let's take an example first
list1=[1,2,3,4]
list2=list1 (that means they points to same object)
if we do
list1=list1+[5] it will create a new object of list
print(list1) output [1,2,3,4,5]
print(list2) output [1,2,3,4]
but if we append then
list1.append(5) no new object of list created
print(list1) output [1,2,3,4,5]
print(list2) output [1,2,3,4,5]
extend(list) also do the same work as append it just append a list instead of a
single variable
The append() method adds a single item to the existing list
some_list1 = []
some_list1.append("something")
So here the some_list1 will get modified.
Updated:
Whereas using + to combine the elements of lists (more than one element) in the existing list similar to the extend (as corrected by Flux).
some_list2 = []
some_list2 += ["something"]
So here the some_list2 and ["something"] are the two lists that are combined.