361

What's a simple and canonical way to read an entire file into memory in Scala? (Ideally, with control over character encoding.)

The best I can come up with is:

scala.io.Source.fromPath("file.txt").getLines.reduceLeft(_+_)

or am I supposed to use one of Java's god-awful idioms, the best of which (without using an external library) seems to be:

import java.util.Scanner
import java.io.File
new Scanner(new File("file.txt")).useDelimiter("\\Z").next()

From reading mailing list discussions, it's not clear to me that scala.io.Source is even supposed to be the canonical I/O library. I don't understand what its intended purpose is, exactly.

... I'd like something dead-simple and easy to remember. For example, in these languages it's very hard to forget the idiom ...

Ruby    open("file.txt").read
Ruby    File.read("file.txt")
Python  open("file.txt").read()
Ricardo
  • 3,696
  • 5
  • 36
  • 50
Brendan OConnor
  • 9,624
  • 3
  • 27
  • 25
  • 12
    Java isnt that bad if you know the right tools. import org.apache.commons.io.FileUtils; FileUtils.readFileToString(new File("file.txt", "UTF-8") – smartnut007 Jun 18 '11 at 00:01
  • 25
    This comment misses the point of language design. Any language which has available a simple library function for exactly the operation you want to perform is therefore as good as its function invocation syntax. Given an infinite and 100% memorised library, all programs would be implemented with a single function call. A programming language is good when it needs fewer pre-fab components to already exist in order to achieve a specific result. – Chris Mountford Feb 09 '14 at 05:45
  • I'm afraid "Given an infinite and 100% memorised library" is not a premise for any rational argument! Programming languages are for humans, and ideally should contain just the abstractions needed to glue things together – Alex Oct 31 '20 at 08:07
  • The best modern solution is to use Li's [os-lib](https://github.com/lihaoyi/os-lib) [as he mentioned here](https://stackoverflow.com/a/56310888/1125159). os-lib hides the Java ugliness and provides [Ruby-like elegance](https://mungingdata.com/scala/filesystem-paths-move-copy-list-delete-folders/). – Powers Dec 14 '20 at 03:23

19 Answers19

484
val lines = scala.io.Source.fromFile("file.txt").mkString

By the way, "scala." isn't really necessary, as it's always in scope anyway, and you can, of course, import io's contents, fully or partially, and avoid having to prepend "io." too.

The above leaves the file open, however. To avoid problems, you should close it like this:

val source = scala.io.Source.fromFile("file.txt")
val lines = try source.mkString finally source.close()

Another problem with the code above is that it is horribly slow due to its implementation. For larger files one should use:

source.getLines mkString "\n"
automorphic
  • 680
  • 7
  • 18
Daniel C. Sobral
  • 295,120
  • 86
  • 501
  • 681
  • Ah, definitely better then reduceLeft(_+_). – Brendan OConnor Aug 16 '09 at 15:06
  • 52
    I'm too late to the party, but I'd hate for people not to know they can do "io.File("/etc/passwd").slurp" in trunk. – psp Aug 26 '09 at 03:48
  • 6
    I'd hate for Scala 2.8 to have a method called "`slurp`", but it seems I'm stuck with it anyway. – Daniel C. Sobral Aug 26 '09 at 13:34
  • 5
    I would have been negotiable on the name, but due to your "utter disgust" I will do my best to keep it the way it is. Thank you for your characteristic thanklessness. – psp Aug 26 '09 at 15:05
  • 28
    @extempore If you truly think I'm thankless, I'm truly sorry. I deeply appreciate your support of the Scala language and each and every time you have personally looked into an issue I brought up, suggested a solution to a problem I had, or explained something to me. I'll take the opportunity, then, to thank you for turning scala.io into something decent and worthy. I'll be more vocal in my thanks from now on, but I still hate the name, sorry. – Daniel C. Sobral Aug 26 '09 at 17:50
  • 50
    "slurp" has been the name for reading an entire file at once in Perl for many years. Perl has a more visceral and informal naming tradition than the C family of languages, which some may find distasteful, but in this case I think it fits: it's an ugly word for an ugly practice. When you slurp(), you know you're doing something naughty because you just had to type that. – Marcus Downing Sep 04 '09 at 19:43
  • "make suggestions instead" - Source should detect the file's encoding (within reason) and read it correctly. Unicode's BOMs are standard, and there are other metrics that are good enough to guess an encoding given the first hundred bytes of a file. I shouldn't have to invent something clever to detect a file that happens to be UCS-2. Yes, this has happened to me. – Marcus Downing Sep 04 '09 at 19:49
  • I'm pretty sure I have seen such code, but I definitely can't find it right now on trunk. – Daniel C. Sobral Sep 04 '09 at 22:28
  • (I wasn't actually using Scala at the time...) – Marcus Downing Sep 04 '09 at 23:04
  • 16
    File.read() would be a nicer name, and consistent with Ruby and Python besides. – Brendan OConnor Sep 07 '09 at 03:33
  • 26
    @extempore: you can't stop people from being disgusted. It's just the way it is. It shouldn't bother you that some people don't like every choice you've made. That's just life, you can't please everybody :) – Alex Baranosky Sep 25 '09 at 20:28
  • Scala 2.8 doesn't have a `fromPath` method. `fromFile` is still being used, and still accepts the file name in a string. – Hosam Aly Oct 10 '10 at 10:56
  • @Hosam Yeah, they reverted that at the very end. Fixed. – Daniel C. Sobral Oct 10 '10 at 15:24
  • 13
    Note that simply calling fromFile.getLines will instantiate a Source instance but not close it. This means that the Scala runtime may retain a lock on the the file in the file system, preventing it from being opened for write, renamed, removed, etc. as long as the Scala Source insance is holding the lock. The following will read the files and also close the file. def linesFrom(fileName:String) : List[String] = { val source = scala.io.Source.fromFile(fileName) val text = source.getLines source.close() text } – djb Aug 01 '11 at 02:49
  • 1
    @djb This lock is a Windows problem, but I take your point. It would leak file descriptors at any rate, which can be a serious problem. I have edited the question accordingly. – Daniel C. Sobral Aug 01 '11 at 14:24
  • 2
    By the way, bare `mkString` (no `getLines`) is fixed in 2.11. – Rex Kerr Feb 25 '14 at 13:53
  • @RexKerr You mean speed-wise? Cool! I've gotta take a look at it. Did they override it at the iterator level? – Daniel C. Sobral Feb 25 '14 at 16:00
  • 1
    @DanielC.Sobral - This is what "they" did: https://github.com/scala/scala/pull/2929 – Rex Kerr Feb 25 '14 at 17:07
  • @DanielC.Sobral Would the mkString part be a more complete platform independent implementation with: source.getLines mkString System.lineSeparator? – Benjamin Mar 22 '14 at 19:58
  • 1
    @Ben I don't think so. Once you have read it as a `String`, you are working with an internal Java representation, and in this representation `\n` is a new line. If you output that again, the output method _probably_ understands new line correctly. Only if you are going to output it, and then output method requires system-dependent new lines, would it be useful to do that. – Daniel C. Sobral Mar 22 '14 at 20:04
  • @DanielC.Sobral Good to know. So unless one plans to spit it out somewhere else, like stdo or another file, then there is no consequence. Thank you. – Benjamin Mar 22 '14 at 20:11
  • 1
    @Ben Yes. And even spitting it out, `\n` is probably the right thing. – Daniel C. Sobral Mar 22 '14 at 20:21
64

Just to expand on Daniel's solution, you can shorten things up tremendously by inserting the following import into any file which requires file manipulation:

import scala.io.Source._

With this, you can now do:

val lines = fromFile("file.txt").getLines

I would be wary of reading an entire file into a single String. It's a very bad habit, one which will bite you sooner and harder than you think. The getLines method returns a value of type Iterator[String]. It's effectively a lazy cursor into the file, allowing you to examine just the data you need without risking memory glut.

Oh, and to answer your implied question about Source: yes, it is the canonical I/O library. Most code ends up using java.io due to its lower-level interface and better compatibility with existing frameworks, but any code which has a choice should be using Source, particularly for simple file manipulation.

Daniel Spiewak
  • 54,515
  • 14
  • 108
  • 120
  • OK. There's a story for my negative impression of Source: I once was in a different situation than now, where I had a very large file that wouldn't fit into memory. Using Source caused the program to crash; it turned out it was trying to read the whole thing at once. – Brendan OConnor Aug 18 '09 at 16:38
  • 7
    Source is not supposed to read the whole file into memory. If you use toList after getLines, or some other method which will produce a collection, then you get everything into memory. Now, Source is a *hack*, intended to get the job done, not a carefully thought-out library. It will be improved in Scala 2.8, but there's definitely opportunity for the Scala community to become active in defining a good I/O API. – Daniel C. Sobral Aug 18 '09 at 21:08
41

Java 8+

import java.nio.charset.StandardCharsets
import java.nio.file.{Files, Paths}

val path = Paths.get("file.txt")
new String(Files.readAllBytes(path), StandardCharsets.UTF_8)

Java 11+

import java.nio.charset.StandardCharsets
import java.nio.file.{Files, Path}

val path = Path.of("file.txt")
Files.readString(path, StandardCharsets.UTF_8)

These offer control over character encoding, and no resources to clean up. It's also faster than other patterns (e.g. getLines().mkString("\n")) due to more efficient allocation patterns.

Paul Draper
  • 78,542
  • 46
  • 206
  • 285
37
// for file with utf-8 encoding
val lines = scala.io.Source.fromFile("file.txt", "utf-8").getLines.mkString
Walter Chang
  • 11,547
  • 2
  • 47
  • 36
  • 6
    Adding "getLines" to the original answer will remove all newlines. Should be "Source.fromFile("file.txt", "utf-8").mkString". – Joe23 Dec 16 '10 at 10:54
  • 11
    See also my comment in the Daniel C. Sobral's answer - this use will not close the Source instance, so Scala may retain a lock on the file. – djb Aug 01 '11 at 02:51
25

(EDIT: This does not work in scala 2.9 and maybe not 2.8 either)

Use trunk:

scala> io.File("/etc/passwd").slurp
res0: String = 
##
# User Database
# 
... etc
Brendan OConnor
  • 9,624
  • 3
  • 27
  • 25
psp
  • 12,138
  • 1
  • 41
  • 51
  • 15
    "`slurp`"? Have we truly ditched obvious, intuitive name? The problem with `slurp` is that it might make sense after-the-fact, to someone with English as a first language, at least, but you would never think of it to begin with! – Daniel C. Sobral Aug 26 '09 at 13:32
  • 5
    Just stumbled on this question/answer. `File` is no longer in 2.8.0, isn't it? – huynhjl Feb 21 '10 at 05:38
  • 3
    You can still sneak it in from scala.tools.nsc.io.File, though I assume that location may change in the future, so use at your own risk. ;-) Oh, and let me chime in to say how much I hate "slurp" as the name as well. – Steve Aug 03 '10 at 15:01
  • 4
    slurp sounds great. :) I wouldn't expect it, but I didn't expect output to the screen to be named 'print' either. `slurp` is fantastic! :) Was fantastic? I don't find it. ;( – user unknown Apr 24 '11 at 04:00
  • 5
    in scala-2.10.0 the package name is scala.reflect.io.File And a question about this "File". extempore, why is this file marked as "experimental"? Is it safe? Does it free a lock to the file system? – VasiliNovikov Mar 30 '13 at 14:10
  • 3
    in Clojure it's also named slurp – Display Name Jun 10 '15 at 20:04
  • 4
    slurp has a long history for this purpose originating, I think, from perl – Chris Mountford Nov 27 '15 at 00:37
  • Ok, it is good because not need `close`, is it? And I can use it in any modern Scala, from 2.11 to 2.13 is it? – Peter Krauss Feb 19 '21 at 22:37
7

I've been told that Source.fromFile is problematic. Personally, I have had problems opening large files with Source.fromFile and have had to resort to Java InputStreams.

Another interesting solution is using scalax. Here's an example of some well commented code that opens a log file using ManagedResource to open a file with scalax helpers: http://pastie.org/pastes/420714

Ikai Lan
  • 2,210
  • 12
  • 13
7

Using getLines() on scala.io.Source discards what characters were used for line terminators (\n, \r, \r\n, etc.)

The following should preserve it character-for-character, and doesn't do excessive string concatenation (performance problems):

def fileToString(file: File, encoding: String) = {
  val inStream = new FileInputStream(file)
  val outStream = new ByteArrayOutputStream
  try {
    var reading = true
    while ( reading ) {
      inStream.read() match {
        case -1 => reading = false
        case c => outStream.write(c)
      }
    }
    outStream.flush()
  }
  finally {
    inStream.close()
  }
  new String(outStream.toByteArray(), encoding)
}
Muyyatin
  • 71
  • 1
  • 1
7

If you don't mind a third-party dependency, you should consider using my OS-Lib library. This makes reading/writing files and working with the filesystem very convenient:

// Make sure working directory exists and is empty
val wd = os.pwd/"out"/"splash"
os.remove.all(wd)
os.makeDir.all(wd)

// Read/write files
os.write(wd/"file.txt", "hello")
os.read(wd/"file.txt") ==> "hello"

// Perform filesystem operations
os.copy(wd/"file.txt", wd/"copied.txt")
os.list(wd) ==> Seq(wd/"copied.txt", wd/"file.txt")

with one-line helpers for reading bytes, reading chunks, reading lines, and many other useful/common operations

Li Haoyi
  • 15,330
  • 17
  • 80
  • 137
6

Just like in Java, using CommonsIO library:

FileUtils.readFileToString(file, StandardCharsets.UTF_8)

Also, many answers here forget Charset. It's better to always provide it explicitly, or it will hit one day.

Dzmitry Lazerka
  • 1,809
  • 2
  • 21
  • 37
6

One more: https://github.com/pathikrit/better-files#streams-and-codecs

Various ways to slurp a file without loading the contents into memory:

val bytes  : Iterator[Byte]            = file.bytes
val chars  : Iterator[Char]            = file.chars
val lines  : Iterator[String]          = file.lines
val source : scala.io.BufferedSource   = file.content 

You can supply your own codec too for anything that does a read/write (it assumes scala.io.Codec.default if you don't provide one):

val content: String = file.contentAsString  // default codec
// custom codec:
import scala.io.Codec
file.contentAsString(Codec.ISO8859)
//or
import scala.io.Codec.string2codec
file.write("hello world")(codec = "US-ASCII")
pathikrit
  • 32,469
  • 37
  • 142
  • 221
4

For emulating Ruby syntax (and convey the semantics) of opening and reading a file, consider this implicit class (Scala 2.10 and upper),

import java.io.File

def open(filename: String) = new File(filename)

implicit class RichFile(val file: File) extends AnyVal {
  def read = io.Source.fromFile(file).getLines.mkString("\n")
}

In this way,

open("file.txt").read
elm
  • 20,117
  • 14
  • 67
  • 113
4

You do not need to parse every single line and then concatenate them again...

Source.fromFile(path)(Codec.UTF8).mkString

I prefer to use this:

import scala.io.{BufferedSource, Codec, Source}
import scala.util.Try

def readFileUtf8(path: String): Try[String] = Try {
  val source: BufferedSource = Source.fromFile(path)(Codec.UTF8)
  val content = source.mkString
  source.close()
  content
}
comonad
  • 5,134
  • 2
  • 33
  • 31
  • You should close the stream - if error occurs in `val content = source.mkString` – Andrzej Jozwik Jul 31 '18 at 07:05
  • +1 for `Codec`. I got test fail on `sbt test` because can't set it, while Intellij's test command pass all tests. And you can use `def using` from [this](https://alvinalexander.com/scala/how-to-open-read-text-files-in-scala-cookbook-examples) – Mikhail Ionkin Sep 04 '19 at 14:12
3

The obvious question being "why do you want to read in the entire file?" This is obviously not a scalable solution if your files get very large. The scala.io.Source gives you back an Iterator[String] from the getLines method, which is very useful and concise.

It's not much of a job to come up with an implicit conversion using the underlying java IO utilities to convert a File, a Reader or an InputStream to a String. I think that the lack of scalability means that they are correct not to add this to the standard API.

oxbow_lakes
  • 133,303
  • 56
  • 317
  • 449
  • 12
    Seriously? How many files do you really read on a regular basis that have real problems fitting in memory? The vast majority of files in the vast majority of programs I have ever dealt with are easily small enough to fit into memory. Frankly, big data files are the exception, and you should realize that and program accordingly if you are going to be reading/writing them. – Christopher Aug 17 '09 at 15:24
  • 8
    oxbow_lakes, I disagree. There are many situations involving small files whose size will not grow in the future. – Brendan OConnor Aug 18 '09 at 16:37
  • 4
    I agree that they are the exception - but I think that is why a read-entire-file-into-memory is not in either the JDK or the Scala SDK. It's a 3 line utility method for you to write yourself: get over it – oxbow_lakes Aug 18 '09 at 17:16
3

you can also use Path from scala io to read and process files.

import scalax.file.Path

Now you can get file path using this:-

val filePath = Path("path_of_file_to_b_read", '/')
val lines = file.lines(includeTerminator = true)

You can also Include terminators but by default it is set to false..

Atiq
  • 396
  • 1
  • 3
  • 10
3

as a few people mentioned scala.io.Source is best to be avoided due to connection leaks.

Probably scalax and pure java libs like commons-io are the best options until the new incubator project (ie scala-io) gets merged.

poko
  • 258
  • 2
  • 8
3

For faster overall reading / uploading a (large) file, consider increasing the size of bufferSize (Source.DefaultBufSize set to 2048), for instance as follows,

val file = new java.io.File("myFilename")
io.Source.fromFile(file, bufferSize = Source.DefaultBufSize * 2)

Note Source.scala. For further discussion see Scala fast text file read and upload to memory.

Community
  • 1
  • 1
elm
  • 20,117
  • 14
  • 67
  • 113
1

print every line, like use Java BufferedReader read ervery line, and print it:

scala.io.Source.fromFile("test.txt" ).foreach{  print  }

equivalent:

scala.io.Source.fromFile("test.txt" ).foreach( x => print(x))
gordonpro
  • 271
  • 3
  • 7
-2
import scala.io.source
object ReadLine{
def main(args:Array[String]){
if (args.length>0){
for (line <- Source.fromLine(args(0)).getLine())
println(line)
}
}

in arguments you can give file path and it will return all lines

Apurw
  • 103
  • 3
  • 12
  • 3
    What does this offer that the other answer don't? – jwvh Jul 23 '17 at 21:58
  • Haven't seen other answers... just thought I can contribute here so posted... hopefully that will not harm anyone :) – Apurw Jul 24 '17 at 14:52
  • 1
    You really should read them. Most are quite informative. Even the ones that are 8 years old have relevant information. – jwvh Jul 24 '17 at 16:37
-2

You can use

Source.fromFile(fileName).getLines().mkString

however it should be noticed that getLines() removes all new line characters. If you want save formatting you should use

Source.fromFile(fileName).iter.mkString
Y2Kot
  • 17
  • 9
  • 3
    This answer doesn't bring any new help , there already loads of answers and comments saying the same thing. Unless you can add more context around this. Please do read : [How to give a good answer?](https://stackoverflow.com/help/how-to-answer) – Vivek Jan 12 '21 at 23:34