779

How can I remove an object from an array? I wish to remove the object that includes name Kristian from someArray. For example:

someArray = [{name:"Kristian", lines:"2,5,10"},
             {name:"John", lines:"1,19,26,96"}];

I want to achieve:

someArray = [{name:"John", lines:"1,19,26,96"}];
Kamil Kiełczewski
  • 85,173
  • 29
  • 368
  • 345
Clem
  • 11,334
  • 8
  • 34
  • 48

32 Answers32

1011

You can use several methods to remove item(s) from an Array:

//1
someArray.shift(); // first element removed
//2
someArray = someArray.slice(1); // first element removed
//3
someArray.splice(0, 1); // first element removed
//4
someArray.pop(); // last element removed
//5
someArray = someArray.slice(0, someArray.length - 1); // last element removed
//6
someArray.length = someArray.length - 1; // last element removed

If you want to remove element at position x, use:

someArray.splice(x, 1);

Or

someArray = someArray.slice(0, x).concat(someArray.slice(-x));

Reply to the comment of @chill182: you can remove one or more elements from an array using Array.filter, or Array.splice combined with Array.findIndex (see MDN).

See this Stackblitz project or the snippet below:

// non destructive filter > noJohn = John removed, but someArray will not change
let someArray = getArray();
let noJohn = someArray.filter( el => el.name !== "John" ); 
log(`let noJohn = someArray.filter( el => el.name !== "John")`,
  `non destructive filter [noJohn] =`, format(noJohn));
log(`**someArray.length ${someArray.length}`);

// destructive filter/reassign John removed > someArray2 =
let someArray2 = getArray();
someArray2 = someArray2.filter( el => el.name !== "John" );
log("", 
  `someArray2 = someArray2.filter( el => el.name !== "John" )`,
  `destructive filter/reassign John removed [someArray2] =`, 
  format(someArray2));
log(`**someArray2.length after filter ${someArray2.length}`);

// destructive splice /w findIndex Brian remains > someArray3 =
let someArray3 = getArray();
someArray3.splice(someArray3.findIndex(v => v.name === "Kristian"), 1);
someArray3.splice(someArray3.findIndex(v => v.name === "John"), 1);
log("",
  `someArray3.splice(someArray3.findIndex(v => v.name === "Kristian"), 1),`,
  `destructive splice /w findIndex Brian remains [someArray3] =`, 
  format(someArray3));
log(`**someArray3.length after splice ${someArray3.length}`);

// if you're not sure about the contents of your array, 
// you should check the results of findIndex first
let someArray4 = getArray();
const indx = someArray4.findIndex(v => v.name === "Michael");
someArray4.splice(indx, indx >= 0 ? 1 : 0);
log("", `someArray4.splice(indx, indx >= 0 ? 1 : 0)`,
  `check findIndex result first [someArray4] = (nothing is removed)`,
  format(someArray4));
log(`**someArray4.length (should still be 3) ${someArray4.length}`);

// -- helpers -- 
function format(obj) {
  return JSON.stringify(obj, null, " ");
}

function log(...txt) {
  document.querySelector("pre").textContent += `${txt.join("\n")}\n`
}

function getArray() {
  return [ {name: "Kristian", lines: "2,5,10"},
           {name: "John", lines: "1,19,26,96"},
           {name: "Brian", lines: "3,9,62,36"} ];
}
<pre>
**Results**

</pre>
KooiInc
  • 119,216
  • 31
  • 141
  • 177
  • 2
    @Klemzy didnt you mean not by index ? by value ...? – Royi Namir Apr 05 '12 at 08:24
  • 487
    The original question asked how to remove the object with the name="Kristian" from the array. Your answer assumes it's the first item in the array but what if Kristin is not in the first item? Then your answer doesn't work. – Rochelle C Oct 17 '12 at 15:29
  • 12
    @chill182: it's not a specific answer, but a more general one. From it, you should be able to infer the method to remove elements. *If you want to remove element at position x* ... may be a hint for removing other than first elements, right? – KooiInc Oct 17 '12 at 15:47
  • 6
    The splice function was helpful to me, but you shouldn't have re-assigned someArray. This will result in someArray containing the removed item, instead of it containing the resulting array with the item removed. – Kenn Cal Jan 02 '14 at 06:10
  • another thing i want, There will be separate buttons for every object in array. if i want to delete that particular object in the array button clicked. how to do it . i have used angular js ng-repeat to generate items. can you help me – Thilak Raj Jan 21 '16 at 04:31
  • Technically, it's another array that doesn't include John. – Buffalo Apr 26 '17 at 10:12
  • 2
    You should check the `findIndex` result before using it in `splice`. If there are no elements in the array that match the condition `findIndex` will return `-1`and putting this directly into `splice` will result in an arbitraty deletion of the last element in the array. – jdnz Feb 19 '20 at 10:06
  • 2
    How is this the accepted answer...? –  Aug 22 '22 at 21:56
307

The clean solution would be to use Array.filter:

var filtered = someArray.filter(function(el) { return el.Name != "Kristian"; }); 

The problem with this is that it does not work on IE < 9. However, you can include code from a Javascript library (e.g. underscore.js) that implements this for any browser.

Simon
  • 38
  • 7
Jon
  • 428,835
  • 81
  • 738
  • 806
  • 12
    This however will remove all the occurrences found, not only the first one – Flavien Volken Jul 12 '16 at 06:49
  • 12
    And it will return a new array instead of modifying the original one. Depending on the use case, this may or may not be what you want. – Jochie Nabuurs Dec 13 '17 at 10:53
  • 1
    @JochieNabuurs it is indeed a new array. However, the object remains the same. You can still modify each object's value and it will reflect on the original array's object. – DriLLFreAK100 Jan 23 '19 at 03:46
  • 9
    To the point about this returning a new array, just changing the solution to `someArray = someArray.filter(function(el) { return el.Name != "Kristian"; }); ` addresses that, no? – hBrent Feb 11 '19 at 23:08
  • It will work, doubtless. But if you are concerning about memory management it will create a new object anyway. I don't wanna me picky, this is gonna work for quite any case. But if for any reason you are dealing with a really large array, you should handle removing elements using the same object. – Luciano Camilo Oct 24 '20 at 14:30
  • There is a shorter way of doing this `var filtered = someArray.filter(el => { return el.Name != "Kristian"; });` – Juan Burolleau Oct 06 '21 at 11:05
  • This is a much simpler and more direct answer to the question asked than the accepted answer. – tog22 Oct 15 '21 at 01:10
149

I recommend using lodash.js or sugar.js for common tasks like this:

// lodash.js
someArray = _.reject(someArray, function(el) { return el.Name === "Kristian"; });

// sugar.js
someArray.remove(function(el) { return el.Name === "Kristian"; });

in most projects, having a set of helper methods that is provided by libraries like these is quite useful.

Timo Giese
  • 55
  • 9
psyho
  • 7,142
  • 5
  • 23
  • 24
  • 13
    I think the underscore example is slightly off. Should be `someArray = _.reject(someArray, function(el) { return el.Name === "Kristian"; });` – Andy Ford Dec 20 '13 at 20:11
  • 12
    If you don't want to use underscore.js or sugar.js, you can do this `someArray = someArray.filter(function(e) { return e.Name !== "Kristian"; });` – BenR May 13 '14 at 21:04
  • @AndyFord You can chain methods in _.js so both will work although I think he needs to a call to .value() at the end. – BenCr May 26 '15 at 10:25
  • 2
    another thing i want, There will be separate buttons for every object in array. if i want to delete that particular object in the array button clicked. how to do it . i have used angular js ng-repeat to generate items. can you help me – Thilak Raj Jan 21 '16 at 04:32
  • sugar.js was the best thing I've came across today. Thanks for this, even if it is 4 years later... :) – Daniel Sikes Feb 04 '16 at 18:07
  • 15
    Going to go against the grain here; suggesting one include an entire library for the simple purpose of removing items from objects (which js cleanly supports out of the box, as the accepted answer shows) is poor form. It adds unnecessary weight and complexity to your code unless you already need it for the more powerful functionality the library provides. – Josh Doebbert Aug 04 '16 at 15:26
  • what if there are two conditions for Sugar.js, ie `el.Name === "Kristian"` and `el.Course === "I.T."` ?? – Malcolm Salvador May 15 '17 at 02:58
  • 8
    For simple operation , i will never recommend to include library – Munna Bhakta Jan 31 '19 at 07:27
  • This is a bad answer, including a whole library just for using one simple operation method will increase the whole download size of your application and thus making it unnecessary slow to load over the web. – Jouke Feb 19 '19 at 15:34
119

ES2015

let someArray = [
               {name:"Kristian", lines:"2,5,10"},
               {name:"John", lines:"1,19,26,96"},
               {name:"Kristian", lines:"2,58,160"},
               {name:"Felix", lines:"1,19,26,96"}
            ];

someArray = someArray.filter(person => person.name != 'John');

It will remove John!

Saeid
  • 1,269
  • 1
  • 9
  • 12
  • 16
    Man... Coming from java, I'm highgly confused that such a basic thing to do requires filtering of a list... wtf. This is the most accurate answer to OPs question I read so far. – codepleb Jan 14 '18 at 21:16
  • Yes, this is a good approach. Though it will also work prior to ES2015(ES6). The filter function has been available since version 5.1(2011) https://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/5.1/#sec-15.4.4.20 – user3777549 Nov 25 '18 at 21:29
  • Nice and clean :) – RobbB Dec 18 '21 at 23:20
  • I use this one-line-solution with success in my case, it is very adaptive too : the condition can easily be customized. – jhice Jan 24 '22 at 10:17
94

How about this?

$.each(someArray, function(i){
    if(someArray[i].name === 'Kristian') {
        someArray.splice(i,1);
        return false;
    }
});
Allan Taylor
  • 1,123
  • 6
  • 4
76

Your "array" as shown is invalid JavaScript syntax. Curly brackets {} are for objects with property name/value pairs, but square brackets [] are for arrays - like so:

someArray = [{name:"Kristian", lines:"2,5,10"}, {name:"John", lines:"1,19,26,96"}];

In that case, you can use the .splice() method to remove an item. To remove the first item (index 0), say:

someArray.splice(0,1);

// someArray = [{name:"John", lines:"1,19,26,96"}];

If you don't know the index but want to search through the array to find the item with name "Kristian" to remove you could to this:

for (var i =0; i < someArray.length; i++)
   if (someArray[i].name === "Kristian") {
      someArray.splice(i,1);
      break;
   }

EDIT: I just noticed your question is tagged with "jQuery", so you could try the $.grep() method:

someArray = $.grep(someArray,
                   function(o,i) { return o.name === "Kristian"; },
                   true);
nnnnnn
  • 147,572
  • 30
  • 200
  • 241
  • Why did they add the overload? Surely you could have just put != "Kristian". What purpose does the overload serve? – markthewizard1234 Oct 13 '17 at 15:56
  • @markthewizard1234 - Do you mean the "invert" Boolean argument in `$.grep()`? It doesn't add much in this example, where yes, I could've put `!=`, but in other cases you might already have a function defined that happens to do the opposite test to what you want to grep, so then rather than defining an additional function you can just use that overload to invert the results. – nnnnnn Oct 14 '17 at 00:02
  • Ah, so if you had a wrapper function containing the grep you could set the boolean as a parameter. Got it thanks! – markthewizard1234 Oct 16 '17 at 10:25
  • @markthewizard1234 - You could, but that's not what I had in mind: imagine you had `function isEven(num) { return num%2===0 }`. You could use `$.grep(someArray, isEven)` to get just the even numbers from the array, or `$.grep(someArray, isEven, true)` to do the opposite and get the non-even values. – nnnnnn Oct 16 '17 at 10:52
59

You could use array.filter().

e.g.

        someArray = [{name:"Kristian", lines:"2,5,10"},
                     {name:"John", lines:"1,19,26,96"}];

        someArray = someArray.filter(function(returnableObjects){
               return returnableObjects.name !== 'Kristian';
        });

        //someArray will now be = [{name:"John", lines:"1,19,26,96"}];

Arrow functions:

someArray = someArray.filter(x => x.name !== 'Kristian')
daCoda
  • 3,583
  • 5
  • 33
  • 38
  • another thing i want, There will be separate buttons for every object in array. if i want to delete that particular object in the array button clicked. how to do it . i have used angular js ng-repeat to generate items. can you help me – Thilak Raj Jan 21 '16 at 04:32
  • daCoda what if you have two conditions? – Malcolm Salvador May 12 '17 at 03:11
  • @MalcolmSalvador say for example if you have another conditions you can write this like below and continue with different && or || operator according to your need. someArray = someArray.filter(function(returnableObjects){ return returnableObjects.name !== 'Kristian' && cond2Query.age >= 22; }); – Biswajit Panday Apr 01 '20 at 06:32
21
const someArray = [{name:"Kristian", lines:"2,5,10"}, {name:"John", lines:"1,19,26,96"}];

We get the index of the object which have name property value as "Kristian"

const index = someArray.findIndex(key => key.name === "Kristian");
console.log(index); // 0

By using splice function we are removing the object which have the name property value as "Kristian"

someArray.splice(index,1);
console.log(someArray); // [{name:"John", lines:"1,19,26,96"}]
Sandeep Mukherjee
  • 673
  • 1
  • 9
  • 17
20

I have made a dynamic function takes the objects Array, Key and value and returns the same array after removing the desired object:

function removeFunction (myObjects,prop,valu)
        {
             return myObjects.filter(function (val) {
              return val[prop] !== valu;
          });

        }

Full Example: DEMO

var obj = {
            "results": [
              {
                  "id": "460",
                  "name": "Widget 1",
                  "loc": "Shed"
              }, {
                  "id": "461",
                  "name": "Widget 2",
                  "loc": "Kitchen"
              }, {
                  "id": "462",
                  "name": "Widget 3",
                  "loc": "bath"
              }
            ]
            };


        function removeFunction (myObjects,prop,valu)
        {
             return myObjects.filter(function (val) {
              return val[prop] !== valu;
          });

        }


console.log(removeFunction(obj.results,"id","460"));
Bishoy Hanna
  • 4,539
  • 1
  • 29
  • 31
20

This is a function that works for me:

function removeFromArray(array, value) {
    var idx = array.indexOf(value);
    if (idx !== -1) {
        array.splice(idx, 1);
    }
    return array;
}
ggmendez
  • 601
  • 7
  • 18
15

You could also try doing something like this:

var myArray = [{'name': 'test'}, {'name':'test2'}];
var myObject = {'name': 'test'};
myArray.splice(myArray.indexOf(myObject),1);
Ammar
  • 1,068
  • 2
  • 13
  • 20
Mikebarson
  • 572
  • 7
  • 23
  • 3
    `myArray.indexOf(myObject)` returns -1, because no item was reference-equal to `myObject`. so `splice()` removes the -1th element in the array, which in this case is `{'name':'test2'}`! – Birchlabs Sep 22 '20 at 10:05
12
someArray = jQuery.grep(someArray , function (value) {
        return value.name != 'Kristian';
});
Andre Morata
  • 641
  • 6
  • 6
10

Use splice function on arrays. Specify the position of the start element and the length of the subsequence you want to remove.

someArray.splice(pos, 1);
gabitzish
  • 9,535
  • 7
  • 44
  • 65
10

Here is an example with map and splice

const arrayObject = [
  { name: "name1", value: "value1" },
  { name: "name2", value: "value2" },
  { name: "name3", value: "value3" },
];

let index = arrayObject.map((item) => item.name).indexOf("name1");
if (index > -1) {
  arrayObject.splice(index, 1);
  console.log("Result", arrayObject);
}

Output

Result [
  {
    "name": "name2",
    "value": "value2"
  },
  {
    "name": "name3",
    "value": "value3"
  }
]
jfk
  • 4,335
  • 34
  • 27
9

Vote for the UndercoreJS for simple work with arrays.

_.without() function helps to remove an element:

 _.without([1, 2, 1, 0, 3, 1, 4], 0, 1);
    => [2, 3, 4]
JuliaCesar
  • 1,019
  • 12
  • 17
9

Performance

Today 2021.01.27 I perform tests on MacOs HighSierra 10.13.6 on Chrome v88, Safari v13.1.2 and Firefox v84 for chosen solutions.

Results

For all browsers:

  • fast/fastest solutions when element not exists: A and B
  • fast/fastest solutions for big arrays: C
  • fast/fastest solutions for big arrays when element exists: H
  • quite slow solutions for small arrays: F and G
  • quite slow solutions for big arrays: D, E and F

enter image description here

Details

I perform 4 tests cases:

  • small array (10 elements) and element exists - you can run it HERE
  • small array (10 elements) and element NOT exists - you can run it HERE
  • big array (milion elements) and element exists - you can run it HERE
  • big array (milion elements) and element NOT exists - you can run it HERE

Below snippet presents differences between solutions A B C D E F G H I

function A(arr, name) {
  let idx = arr.findIndex(o => o.name==name);
  if(idx>=0) arr.splice(idx, 1);
  return arr;
}


function B(arr, name) {
  let idx = arr.findIndex(o => o.name==name);
  return idx<0 ? arr : arr.slice(0,idx).concat(arr.slice(idx+1,arr.length));
}


function C(arr, name) {
  let idx = arr.findIndex(o => o.name==name);
  delete arr[idx];
  return arr;
}


function D(arr, name) {
  return arr.filter(el => el.name != name);
}


function E(arr, name) {
  let result = [];
  arr.forEach(o => o.name==name || result.push(o));
  return result;
}


function F(arr, name) {
  return _.reject(arr, el => el.name == name);
}


function G(arr, name) {
  let o = arr.find(o => o.name==name);
  return _.without(arr,o);
}


function H(arr, name) {
  $.each(arr, function(i){
      if(arr[i].name === 'Kristian') {
          arr.splice(i,1);
          return false;
      }
  });
  return arr;
}


function I(arr, name) {
  return $.grep(arr,o => o.name!=name);
}








// Test
let test1 = [   
    {name:"Kristian", lines:"2,5,10"},
    {name:"John", lines:"1,19,26,96"},  
];

let test2 = [   
    {name:"John3", lines:"1,19,26,96"},
    {name:"Kristian", lines:"2,5,10"},
    {name:"John", lines:"1,19,26,96"},
  {name:"Joh2", lines:"1,19,26,96"},
];

let test3 = [   
    {name:"John3", lines:"1,19,26,96"},
    {name:"John", lines:"1,19,26,96"},
  {name:"Joh2", lines:"1,19,26,96"},
];

console.log(`
Test1: original array from question
Test2: array with more data
Test3: array without element which we want to delete
`);

[A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,I].forEach(f=> console.log(`
Test1 ${f.name}: ${JSON.stringify(f([...test1],"Kristian"))}
Test2 ${f.name}: ${JSON.stringify(f([...test2],"Kristian"))}
Test3 ${f.name}: ${JSON.stringify(f([...test3],"Kristian"))}
`));
<script src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.5.1.min.js" integrity="sha256-9/aliU8dGd2tb6OSsuzixeV4y/faTqgFtohetphbbj0=" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
  
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.20/lodash.min.js" integrity="sha512-90vH1Z83AJY9DmlWa8WkjkV79yfS2n2Oxhsi2dZbIv0nC4E6m5AbH8Nh156kkM7JePmqD6tcZsfad1ueoaovww==" crossorigin="anonymous"> </script>
  
This shippet only presents functions used in performance tests - it not perform tests itself!

And here are example results for chrome

enter image description here

Kamil Kiełczewski
  • 85,173
  • 29
  • 368
  • 345
6

With ES 6 arrow function

let someArray = [
                 {name:"Kristian", lines:"2,5,10"},
                 {name:"John", lines:"1,19,26,96"}
                ];
let arrayToRemove={name:"Kristian", lines:"2,5,10"};
someArray=someArray.filter((e)=>e.name !=arrayToRemove.name && e.lines!= arrayToRemove.lines)
Siddhartha
  • 1,473
  • 14
  • 10
4

Although this is probably not that appropriate for this situation I found out the other day that you can also use the delete keyword to remove an item from an array if you don't need to alter the size of the array e.g.

var myArray = [1,2,3];

delete myArray[1];

console.log(myArray[1]); //undefined

console.log(myArray.length); //3 - doesn't actually shrink the array down
dougajmcdonald
  • 19,231
  • 12
  • 56
  • 89
3

Simplest solution would be to create a map that stores the indexes for each object by name, like this:

//adding to array
var newPerson = {name:"Kristian", lines:"2,5,10"}
someMap[ newPerson.name ] = someArray.length;
someArray.push( newPerson );

//deleting from the array
var index = someMap[ 'Kristian' ];
someArray.splice( index, 1 );
Creynders
  • 4,573
  • 20
  • 21
  • I like this idea, but must also ask, what are the memory use limits for an idea like this as indexes are added? I have an array that I'd like to index on 2 different fields in the object, so I'd have 2 maps in addition to the original source array. Is this a small price to pay for lookup speed or is there a solution that would be more efficient with memory? – Brad G. Feb 02 '15 at 00:53
3

You can use map function also.

someArray = [{name:"Kristian", lines:"2,5,10"},{name:"John",lines:"1,19,26,96"}];
newArray=[];
someArray.map(function(obj, index){
    if(obj.name !== "Kristian"){
       newArray.push(obj);
    }
});
someArray = newArray;
console.log(someArray);
solanki...
  • 4,982
  • 2
  • 27
  • 29
3

If you want to remove all occurrences of a given object (based on some condition) then use the javascript splice method inside a for the loop.

Since removing an object would affect the array length, make sure to decrement the counter one step, so that length check remains intact.

var objArr=[{Name:"Alex", Age:62},
  {Name:"Robert", Age:18},
  {Name:"Prince", Age:28},
  {Name:"Cesar", Age:38},
  {Name:"Sam", Age:42},
  {Name:"David", Age:52}
];

for(var i = 0;i < objArr.length; i ++)
{
  if(objArr[i].Age > 20)
  {
    objArr.splice(i, 1);
    i--;  //re-adjust the counter.
  }
}

The above code snippet removes all objects with age greater than 20.

ksugiarto
  • 940
  • 1
  • 17
  • 40
Obaid
  • 2,563
  • 17
  • 15
3

This answer

for (var i =0; i < someArray.length; i++)
   if (someArray[i].name === "Kristian") {
      someArray.splice(i,1);
   }

is not working for multiple records fulfilling the condition. If you have two such consecutive records, only the first one is removed, and the other one skipped. You have to use:

for (var i = someArray.length - 1; i>= 0; i--)
   ...

instead .

Shiv Kumar
  • 1,034
  • 1
  • 9
  • 21
JarmoP
  • 331
  • 3
  • 3
3

I guess the answers are very branched and knotted.

You can use the following path to remove an array object that matches the object given in the modern JavaScript jargon.


coordinates = [
    { lat: 36.779098444109145, lng: 34.57202827508546 },
    { lat: 36.778754712956506, lng: 34.56898128564454 },
    { lat: 36.777414146732426, lng: 34.57179224069215 }
];

coordinate = { lat: 36.779098444109145, lng: 34.57202827508546 };

removeCoordinate(coordinate: Coordinate): Coordinate {
    const found = this.coordinates.find((coordinate) => coordinate == coordinate);
    if (found) {
      this.coordinates.splice(found, 1);
    }
    return coordinate;
  }
umutyerebakmaz
  • 887
  • 8
  • 18
2

There seems to be an error in your array syntax so assuming you mean an array as opposed to an object, Array.splice is your friend here:

someArray = [{name:"Kristian", lines:"2,5,10"}, {name:"John", lines:"1,19,26,96"}];
someArray.splice(1,1)
Simon Scarfe
  • 9,378
  • 4
  • 28
  • 32
2

Use javascript's splice() function.

This may help: http://www.w3schools.com/jsref/jsref_splice.asp

2

You could also use some:

someArray = [{name:"Kristian", lines:"2,5,10"},
             {name:"John", lines:"1,19,26,96"}];

someArray.some(item => { 
    if(item.name === "Kristian") // Case sensitive, will only remove first instance
        someArray.splice(someArray.indexOf(item),1) 
})
Artur Grigio
  • 5,185
  • 8
  • 45
  • 65
2

This is what I use.

Array.prototype.delete = function(pos){
    this[pos] = undefined;
    var len = this.length - 1;
    for(var a = pos;a < this.length - 1;a++){
      this[a] = this[a+1];
    }
    this.pop();
  }

Then it is as simple as saying

var myArray = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9];
myArray.delete(3);

Replace any number in place of three. After the expected output should be:

console.log(myArray); //Expected output 1,2,3,5,6,7,8,9
Matthias S
  • 205
  • 2
  • 8
1

splice(i, 1) where i is the incremental index of the array will remove the object. But remember splice will also reset the array length so watch out for 'undefined'. Using your example, if you remove 'Kristian', then in the next execution within the loop, i will be 2 but someArray will be a length of 1, therefore if you try to remove "John" you will get an "undefined" error. One solution to this albeit not elegant is to have separate counter to keep track of index of the element to be removed.

Maksood
  • 1,180
  • 14
  • 19
1

Returns only objects from the array whose property name is not "Kristian"

var noKristianArray = $.grep(someArray, function (el) { return el.name!= "Kristian"; });


Demo:

 var someArray = [
                {name:"Kristian", lines:"2,5,10"},
                {name:"John", lines:"1,19,26,96"},
                {name:"Kristian", lines:"2,58,160"},
                {name:"Felix", lines:"1,19,26,96"}
                ];
    
var noKristianArray = $.grep(someArray, function (el) { return el.name!= "Kristian"; });

console.log(noKristianArray);
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
Legends
  • 21,202
  • 16
  • 97
  • 123
1

you can filter like this:

const someArray = [{
    name: "Kristian",
    lines: "2,5,10"
  },
  {
    name: "John",
    lines: "1,19,26,96"
  }
];
var filtered = someArray.filter((el) => el.name != "Kristian");
console.log(filtered)
rnewed_user
  • 1,386
  • 7
  • 13
0

This Concepts using Kendo Grid

var grid = $("#addNewAllergies").data("kendoGrid");

var selectedItem = SelectedCheckBoxList;

for (var i = 0; i < selectedItem.length; i++) {
    if(selectedItem[i].boolKendoValue==true)
    {
        selectedItem.length= 0;
    }
}
Siva Ragu
  • 17
  • 4
0

If you don't have any properties on the objects in the array that you know (or perhaps that are unique), but you have a reference to the object that you want to remove, you can do what's in the unregisterObject method below:

let registeredObjects = [];

function registerObject(someObject) { registeredObjects.push(someObject); }
function unregisterObject(someObject) { registeredObjects = registeredObjects.filter(obj => obj !== someObject); }

let myObject1 = {hidden: "someValue1"}; // Let's pretend we don't know the hidden attribute
let myObject2 = {hidden: "someValue2"};

registerObject(myObject1);
registerObject(myObject2);
console.log(`There are ${registeredObjects.length} objects registered. They are: ${JSON.stringify(registeredObjects)}`);

unregisterObject(myObject1);
console.log(`There are ${registeredObjects.length} objects registered. They are: ${JSON.stringify(registeredObjects)}`);
Ryan Shillington
  • 23,006
  • 14
  • 93
  • 108