I am trying to develop a mail trigger. Could someone assist on how this could be achieved so that when a use inserts a record it check the "speed" field such that when the inserted value exceeds 100, a mail is send to the specified address.
-
You also need to GRANT EXECUTE to the user for msdb.dbo.sp_send_dbmail if it is running in an app for example. – smoore4 May 19 '17 at 17:35
1 Answers
First you need to set up database mail - if you haven't done so, this question might help:
Then you need a trigger:
CREATE TRIGGER dbo.whatever
ON dbo.wherever
FOR INSERT
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON;
IF EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM inserted WHERE speed > 100)
BEGIN
EXEC msdb.dbo.sp_send_dbmail
@recipients = 'whoever@yourcompany.com',
@profile_name = 'default',
@subject = 'Someone was speeding',
@body = 'Yep, they sure were.';
END
END
GO
Now, you're probably going to say you want data from the insert to be actually be included in the e-mail. And your first inclination is going to be to declare some local variables and assign them from inserted
- this doesn't work because your trigger could be responding to a multi-row insert. So the right way to do this is:
CREATE TRIGGER dbo.whatever
ON dbo.wherever
FOR INSERT
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON;
DECLARE @body NVARCHAR(MAX) = N'';
SELECT @body += CHAR(13) + CHAR(10) + RTRIM(some_col) FROM inserted;
IF EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM inserted WHERE speed > 100)
BEGIN
EXEC msdb.dbo.sp_send_dbmail
@recipients = 'whoever@yourcompany.com',
@profile_name = 'default',
@subject = 'At least one person was speeding',
@body = @body;
END
END
GO
That all said, I am not a big fan of sending e-mail from a trigger. Even though database mail uses service broker and so is asynchronous, I would be much more inclined to populate a queue table, and have a background thread that comes around and sends all of the appropriate e-mails. The twothree nice things about this are:
- you minimize the potential delays in committing the outer transaction that fired the trigger - the more complicated your logic in the trigger, the slower you make that process.
- since it is probably not essential that the e-mail is sent the microsecond the row is inserted, you can easily fluctuate the timing of the background process - this avoids having to check the table very minute, all day, when very few times it will ever have to actually do anything.
- As @goodeye pointed out, keeping this process separate can prevent errors in the e-mail part of the process from interfering with the original DML (in their case, an invalid parameter to
sp_send_dbmail
- which I inadvertently suggested - prevented the insert).

- 1
- 1

- 272,866
- 37
- 466
- 490
-
-
It's been a lot of years since I've done this, but isn't that exactly what calling sp_send_dbmail does? It puts it into a queue, right? – MojoFilter Feb 08 '13 at 18:56
-
@MojoFilter yes, but it's put immediately put on the queue, and you have no control over the mechanics in sp_send_dbmail. I'd rather control the mail flow myself. Again, a preference. You want to send mail inside the trigger, by all means, go ahead. – Aaron Bertrand Feb 08 '13 at 19:30
-
In my 2008 R2, The sp_send_dbmail has `@recipients` parameter, not a `@to` parameter. Chasing this made your point about separating processes - the insert didn't happen because of this error. – goodeye Jun 18 '14 at 15:30
-
Sorry to be late but I would ask a precisation about that solution. Is send mail procedure blocking? Could be a good solution to let trigger to put data For email sending in another table that can be processed by a scheduled job? – gipinani Oct 17 '15 at 21:41
-
Instead of checking every minute, what's another good poll interval to check, how often to check ? – Whirl Mind Feb 07 '20 at 08:18
-
@WhirlMind Are you asking me what is an acceptable maximum delay for an e-mail to be sent, according to your business / users? I can't answer that question. If you don't want to get questions about why an e-mail takes longer than `
` minutes to arrive, make the delay at most ` – Aaron Bertrand Feb 07 '20 at 16:41` minutes. -
@AaronBertrand : No. From a technical view, how much polling is too much polling, before it becomes an overload on the server. Of course, wud depend on the server, but what's a typical poll interval in standard environments, if there is any such thing. – Whirl Mind Feb 08 '20 at 18:11