Instantiate generic type in java

Question

I'm stuck. Coming from C++ I thought this would simply work, but it does not. Can you please give me an advice? I will try to not end up with kind of creation method in each class used for T.

public class A<T>{

    private T t_;

    public A(){
        t_ = new T(); //error
    }

}

Also i don't want to have constructor looking like: A(Class classT){ ... Ideally i would like to have something like this c++ code.

template<class T>
class A{
private:
   T t_;

public:
   A(){}

};

Thanks for help.

possible duplicate of [Create instance of generic type in Java?](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/75175/create-instance-of-generic-type-in-java) — pingw33n, May 31 '12 at 09:33

Louis Wasserman · Answer 1 · 2012-06-04T03:09:52.750

Besides the issue of type erasure -- which makes this impossible in any event -- you simply can't guarantee that T has an exposed, no-argument constructor!

The traditional workaround is to pass around factory objects that provide methods that can be used to obtain T objects. A simplistic example would be

interface Factory<T> {
  T create();
}

and then your class can get a Factory<T> and call create() on it to get more Ts. More sophisticated examples might require additional arguments to a create method, for example, or overloads.

Less-pretty workarounds include explicit reflection, passing around Class<T> objects. For example, ArrayList.class.newInstance() returns a newly constructed raw ArrayList. You have to explicitly pass around the Class object, and the reflection-based approach is slower than a normal constructor or a factory object (even though the speed of reflection has been improving lately). You also depend on the class exposing a no-arg constructor, which isn't always the case. It can be made to work, but it's never what I'd call "pleasant."

(That said, for reference, there are indications that the situation may change somewhat in Java 8 with Project Lambda and friends.)

Thanks for the hint. Seems like i have to do it that way :/ – nux May 31 '12 at 09:32 — nux, May 31 '12 at 09:32

score 6 · Accepted Answer · answered May 31 '12 at 09:29

6

You cannot do such things in Java. Read about type erasure: http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/java/generics/erasure.html

answered May 31 '12 at 09:29

popfalushi

1,332
9
15

score 5 · Answer 3 · answered May 31 '12 at 09:30

5

Sorry to disapoint you but this is just plain impossible in java without constructors.

Java throws away the generic information at runtime (see type erasure)

answered May 31 '12 at 09:30

tgoossens

9,676
2
18
23

score 0 · Answer 4 · answered May 31 '12 at 09:34

try this:

private <E extends ISomething> E createInstance(Class<E> clazz) {
        E ret;
        try {
            ret = clazz.newInstance();
            ret.setSomething(something);

        } catch (InstantiationException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        } catch (IllegalAccessException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
        return ret;
    }

Instantiate generic type in java

4 Answers4

Linked