I need to know whether 'pivot' in MS SQL can be used for converting rows to columns if there is no aggregate function to be used. i saw lot of examples with aggregate function only. my fields are string data type and i need to convert this row data to column data.This is why i wrote this question.i just did it with 'case'. Can anyone help me......Thanks in advance.
-
2You can always use min() or max() on varchar. There should only be one value per location in pivot grid. – Nikola Markovinović Jun 11 '12 at 08:34
-
thanks for the response.. see my problem is, say there is one employee and he has lot data in row wise. i need to select this data as a single row. so the problem is i cant use min() or max().... – Sivajith Jun 11 '12 at 08:42
-
Probably best if you supply example data and some desired results for that data so we can see what you are trying to do and why `MIN` / `MAX` won't work for you. – Martin Smith Jun 11 '12 at 08:51
-
ok.i will give u the data format. empid wagecode amount 1 basic 1000 1 TA 500 1 DA 500 2 Basic 1500 2 TA 750 2 DA 750 and i need the ans as empid BASic TA DA 1 1000 500 500 2 1500 750 750 – Sivajith Jun 11 '12 at 08:54
3 Answers
You can use a PIVOT to perform this operation. When doing the PIVOT you can do it one of two ways, with a Static Pivot that you will code the rows to transform or a Dynamic Pivot which will create the list of columns at run-time:
Static Pivot (see SQL Fiddle with a Demo):
SELECT *
FROM
(
select empid, wagecode, amount
from t1
) x
pivot
(
sum(amount)
for wagecode in ([basic], [TA], [DA])
) p
Dynamic Pivot:
DECLARE @cols AS NVARCHAR(MAX),
@query AS NVARCHAR(MAX);
select @cols = STUFF((SELECT distinct ',' + QUOTENAME(wagecode)
FROM t1
FOR XML PATH(''), TYPE
).value('.', 'NVARCHAR(MAX)')
,1,1,'')
set @query = 'SELECT empid, ' + @cols + ' from
(
select empid, wagecode, amount
from t1
) x
pivot
(
sum(amount)
for wagecode in (' + @cols + ')
) p '
execute(@query)
Both of these will give you the same results

- 242,637
- 56
- 362
- 405
-
1BTW - you can see you dynamic query here: http://sqlfiddle.com/#!3/88cd4/4 (I just had to adjust the query terminator so the declare segment wasn't executed separately from the rest of your code) – Jake Feasel Jun 11 '12 at 18:05
-
@JakeFeasel thanks for adding that, I didn't have time to do both fiddles this morning – Taryn Jun 11 '12 at 18:11
-
@bluefeet sure, no prob. The query terminator UI control is pretty new, wasn't sure if you knew about it / when it might be useful. – Jake Feasel Jun 11 '12 at 18:14
-
sample format
empid wagecode amount
1 basic 1000
1 TA 500
1 DA 500
2 Basic 1500
2 TA 750
2 DA 750
empid basic TA DA
1 1000 500 500
2 1500 750 750
THE ANSWER I GOT IS
SELECT empID , [1bas] as basic, [1tasal] as TA,[1otsal] as DA FROM ( SELECT empID, wage, amount FROM table) up PIVOT (SUM(amt) FOR wgcod IN ([1bas], [1tasal],[1otsal])) AS pvt ORDER BY empID GO

- 1,181
- 5
- 19
- 38
Try this:
SELECT empid AS EmpID
, ISNULL(SUM(CASE wagecode WHEN 'basic' THEN Amount ELSE 0 END), 0) AS Basic
, ISNULL(SUM(CASE wagecode WHEN 'ta' THEN Amount ELSE 0 END), 0) AS TA
, ISNULL(SUM(CASE wagecode WHEN 'da' THEN Amount ELSE 0 END), 0) AS DA
FROM Employee
GROUP BY empid

- 920
- 2
- 20
- 46
-
@ V.P Verma :thanks for your replay. why i go for pivote is to reduce the complexity of the query and to reduce the execution time..i don't know exactly but i think pivote is better than case in this case..once again thanks for the replay..and want to know pivote or case is faster.. – Sivajith Jun 11 '12 at 12:07