In C#, the switch
statement doesn't allow cases to span ranges of values. I don't like the idea of using if-else loops for this purpose, so are there any other ways to check numeric ranges in C#?
Asked
Active
Viewed 2.0k times
12

TheLethalCoder
- 6,668
- 6
- 34
- 69

Kenny
- 819
- 1
- 9
- 24
-
You can't really do it in C# (unless it's a small range of numbers you can list in blocks), but, for once, you **can** in VB.Net - http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1009902/select-case-to-check-range-of-a-decimal-number funnily enough – dash Jul 05 '12 at 06:58
-
Well you can have a method returning bool which takes in the range and then if loops, its simple, readable and does the work well – V4Vendetta Jul 05 '12 at 06:58
-
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/68578/multiple-cases-in-switch You cannot do this in C#. Check the answer above. – Dzung Nguyen Jul 05 '12 at 07:22
-
**Important note** : Ranges are supported in switch case starting C# v7 - [Switch case: can I use a range instead of a one number](https://stackoverflow.com/q/20147879/465053). So, if you feel like better upgrade from C# v3.5 to v7 instead. – RBT May 18 '18 at 11:45
7 Answers
16
You can use a HashTable
respectively Dictionary
to create a mapping of Condition => Action
.
Example:
class Programm
{
static void Main()
{
var myNum = 12;
var cases = new Dictionary<Func<int, bool>, Action>
{
{ x => x < 3 , () => Console.WriteLine("Smaller than 3") } ,
{ x => x < 30 , () => Console.WriteLine("Smaller than 30") } ,
{ x => x < 300 , () => Console.WriteLine("Smaller than 300") }
};
cases.First(kvp => kvp.Key(myNum)).Value();
}
}
This technique is a general alternative to switch
, especially if the actions consists only of one line (like a method call).
And if you're a fan of type aliases:
using Int32Condition = System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary<System.Func<System.Int32, System.Boolean>, System.Action>;
...
var cases = new Int32Condition()
{
{ x => x < 3 , () => Console.WriteLine("Smaller than 3") } ,
{ x => x < 30 , () => Console.WriteLine("Smaller than 30") } ,
{ x => x < 300 , () => Console.WriteLine("Smaller than 300") }
};

Saverio Terracciano
- 3,885
- 1
- 30
- 42

sloth
- 99,095
- 21
- 171
- 219
-
2But you should not take a dictionary (take a list of KeyValuePair, Tuple or sth self defined) otherwise you can't predict in which order the Funcs are called for testing. – Oliver Jul 05 '12 at 08:19
-
1Interesting but if I saw this pattern as a replacement of if/else in real project I'm submitting it to http://thedailywtf.com :) – Stilgar Jul 05 '12 at 08:23
-
This solution is outright ridiculous. Good for a quiz, but very bad for production code. It is slow, as it wastes memory, and causes too much calls which cannot be inlined. – Nick Jul 05 '12 at 08:28
-
This code doesn't even *work*. Since a dictionary is inierently unordered you can't be sure that `x < 3` will be checked before `x < 30`. That it does in one or two tests cases doesn't mean it will hold true. A `Dictionary` is simply the wrong data structure here, unless you ensure that the methods can be called in any order (which you haven't done). As mentinoed by Oliver, a list of tuples would be one way to ensure ordering, and is semantically correct. Note that this isn't really any different than a series of `if/else if` statements either. – Servy Jun 21 '13 at 14:50
5
Nope. Of course, if the ranges are small you could use the
case 4:
case 5:
case 6:
// blah
break;
approach, but other than that: no. Use if
/else
.

Marc Gravell
- 1,026,079
- 266
- 2,566
- 2,900
4
if the interval of the ranges is constant, you can try
int num = 11;
int range = (num - 1) / 10; //here interval is 10
switch (range)
{
case 0:
Console.Write("1-10");
break; // 1-10
case 1:
Console.Write("11-20");
break; // 11-20
// etc...
}
Output would be: "11-20"
if interval is variable then use if/else

Habib
- 219,104
- 29
- 407
- 436
1
No. At least nothing which is more beautiful.
Also there is no C# 3.5 only .NET 3.5 and C# 3.0

Stilgar
- 22,354
- 14
- 64
- 101
1
Try something like this
private void ExecuteInRange(Dictionary<Range,Action<int>> ranges)
{
foreach (var range in ranges)
{
if (range.Key.Value < range.Key.Max && range.Key.Value > range.Key.Max)
range.Value(range.Key.Value);
}
}
public class Range
{
public int Min { get; set; }
public int Max { get; set; }
public int Value { get; set; }
}

Preben Huybrechts
- 5,853
- 2
- 27
- 63
1
int b;
b = Int32.Parse(textBox1.Text);
int ans = (100-b)/3; //the 3 represents the interval
//100 represents the last number
switch(ans)
{
case 0:
MessageBox.Show("98 to 100");
break;
case 1:
MessageBox.Show("95 to 97");
break;
case 2:
MessageBox.Show("92 to 94");
break;
case 3:
MessageBox.Show("89 to 91");
break;
case 4:
MessageBox.Show("86 to 88");
break;
default:
MessageBox.Show("out of range");
break;
-1
A sort of nested-shorthand if-else thing works, and is clean.
myModel.Value = modelResult >= 20 ? 5 : modelResult >= 14 ? 4 : modelResult >= 5 ? 3 : modelResult >= 2 ? 2 : modelResult == 1 ? 1 : 0;

blomster
- 768
- 2
- 10
- 27