106

Can extension methods be applied to the class?

For example, extend DateTime to include a Tomorrow() method that could be invoked like:

DateTime.Tomorrow();

I know I can use

static DateTime Tomorrow(this Datetime value) { //... }

Or

public static MyClass {
  public static Tomorrow() { //... }
}

for a similar result, but how can I extend DateTime so that I could invoke DateTime.Tomorrow?

stackuser83
  • 2,012
  • 1
  • 24
  • 41
David Glenn
  • 24,412
  • 19
  • 74
  • 94

9 Answers9

195

Use an extension method.

Ex:

namespace ExtensionMethods
{
    public static class MyExtensionMethods
    {
        public static DateTime Tomorrow(this DateTime date)
        {
            return date.AddDays(1);
        }    
    }
}

Usage:

DateTime.Now.Tomorrow();

or

AnyObjectOfTypeDateTime.Tomorrow();
chwarr
  • 6,777
  • 1
  • 30
  • 57
Kumu
  • 2,386
  • 2
  • 13
  • 9
  • 2
    [**Shuggy**'s answer](http://stackoverflow.com/a/1188276/274502) also shred some light on similar way to solving this. – cregox Jun 22 '12 at 14:30
  • 8
    Don't forget 'using ExtensionMethods;' at the top of your document for this. – Luke Alderton Jul 03 '13 at 13:19
  • why can't i do DateTime.Tomorrow()? – Laurence Jul 17 '14 at 09:11
  • Hi lawphotog, this extension needs an object, here DateTime is a struct and not an object. – Kumu Jul 18 '14 at 00:36
  • 5
    As mentioned in previous comments (it wasn't clear enough for me apparently), you will NOT be able to use `DateTime.Tomorrow()` as extension methods only work on INSTANCES of a class and a class struct. To "extend" a static method on a class struc, follow [Andrew's answer](http://stackoverflow.com/a/1188231/1543939) or [Shuggy's answer](http://stackoverflow.com/a/1188276/1543939). – Alex Nov 17 '15 at 19:06
71

You cannot add methods to an existing type unless the existing type is marked as partial, you can only add methods that appear to be a member of the existing type through extension methods. Since this is the case you cannot add static methods to the type itself since extension methods use instances of that type.

There is nothing stopping you from creating your own static helper method like this:

static class DateTimeHelper
{
    public static DateTime Tomorrow
    {
        get { return DateTime.Now.AddDays(1); }
    }
}

Which you would use like this:

DateTime tomorrow = DateTimeHelper.Tomorrow;
DonO
  • 1,030
  • 1
  • 13
  • 27
Andrew Hare
  • 344,730
  • 71
  • 640
  • 635
  • 9
    huh woot? unless it was implemented within 6 months of this and [**Kumu**'s answer](http://stackoverflow.com/a/1983396/274502) right there, this looks actually incomplete! – cregox Jun 22 '12 at 14:28
  • 4
    @Cawas this is not incomplete, Andrew is showing how to do this with a static helper, not with an extension method (since there is no instance). – Nick N. Aug 12 '14 at 12:02
  • 1
    You're right, Nick. I do prefer extension methods though! ;) – cregox Aug 12 '14 at 22:48
  • 2
    What's about http://extensionmethod.net/csharp/datetime ? _IMHO, better samples for minimize learning curve are real applications with full source code and good patterns_ – Kiquenet Sep 19 '14 at 11:58
  • 4
    The problem with this code is that it only works on DateTime.Now and not any DateTime object. As a utility, one may want to use it to determine the day after some previous (or future) day. Not to mention DateTime.Now is determined each time you call it... – LunchMarble Sep 15 '15 at 13:02
  • The poster should know he wasn't posting an example of extension method. That's just a regular member property function of a class not an extension. He's misleading. – Jenna Leaf Mar 07 '23 at 09:09
19

Extension methods are syntactic sugar for making static methods whose first parameter is an instance of type T look as if they were an instance method on T.

As such the benefit is largely lost where you to make 'static extension methods' since they would serve to confuse the reader of the code even more than an extension method (since they appear to be fully qualified but are not actually defined in that class) for no syntactical gain (being able to chain calls in a fluent style within Linq for example).

Since you would have to bring the extensions into scope with a using anyway I would argue that it is simpler and safer to create:

public static class DateTimeUtils
{
    public static DateTime Tomorrow { get { ... } }
}

And then use this in your code via:

WriteLine("{0}", DateTimeUtils.Tomorrow)
ShuggyCoUk
  • 36,004
  • 6
  • 77
  • 101
11

The closest I can get to the answer is by adding an extension method into a System.Type object. Not pretty, but still interesting.

public static class Foo
{
    public static void Bar()
    {
        var now = DateTime.Now;
        var tomorrow = typeof(DateTime).Tomorrow();
    }

    public static DateTime Tomorrow(this System.Type type)
    {
        if (type == typeof(DateTime)) {
            return DateTime.Now.AddDays(1);
        } else {
            throw new InvalidOperationException();
        }
    }
}

Otherwise, IMO Andrew and ShuggyCoUk has a better implementation.

Adrian Godong
  • 8,802
  • 8
  • 40
  • 62
  • There are problems with this approach. Having to type "typeof(...)" is not convenient, and with intellisense you would see extensions of every type. Still, it's an interesting approach that I hadn't thought of, +1. – Meta-Knight Jul 27 '09 at 14:04
  • @Meta-Knight True, that's why personally I prefer the other's answer. My answer would have the closest syntax to OP question, but it's not the best way to solve this problem. – Adrian Godong Jul 27 '09 at 14:40
  • `Type` can be replaced with any other type required. I use it with `From` and it works perfectly. so I guess this answer is general but correct – Katia Mar 02 '15 at 06:40
3

They provide the capability to extend existing types by adding new methods with no modifications necessary to the type. Calling methods from objects of the extended type within an application using instance method syntax is known as ‘‘extending’’ methods. Extension methods are not instance members on the type. The key point to remember is that extension methods, defined as static methods, are in scope only when the namespace is explicitly imported into your application source code via the using directive. Even though extension methods are defined as static methods, they are still called using instance syntax.

Example:

class Extension
    {
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            string s = "sudhakar";
            Console.WriteLine(s.GetWordCount());
            Console.ReadLine();
        }
 
    }
    public static class MyMathExtension
    {
 
        public static int GetWordCount(this System.String mystring)
        {
            return mystring.Length;
        }
    }
Dharman
  • 30,962
  • 25
  • 85
  • 135
sudhakar
  • 161
  • 1
  • 1
3

Unfortunately, you can't do that. I believe it would be useful, though. It is more natural to type:

DateTime.Tomorrow

than:

DateTimeUtil.Tomorrow

With a Util class, you have to check for the existence of a static method in two different classes, instead of one.

Meta-Knight
  • 17,626
  • 1
  • 48
  • 58
3

I was looking for something similar - a list of constraints on classes that provide Extension Methods. Seems tough to find a concise list so here goes:

  1. You can't have any private or protected anything - fields, methods, etc.

  2. It must be a static class, as in public static class....

  3. Only methods can be in the class, and they must all be public static.

  4. You can't have conventional static methods - ones that don't include a this argument aren't allowed.

  5. All methods must begin:

    public static ReturnType MethodName(this ClassName _this, ...)

So the first argument is always the this reference.

There is an implicit problem this creates - if you add methods that require a lock of any sort, you can't really provide it at the class level. Typically you'd provide a private instance-level lock, but it's not possible to add any private fields, leaving you with some very awkward options, like providing it as a public static on some outside class, etc. Gets dicey. Signs the C# language had kind of a bad turn in the design for these.

The workaround is to use your Extension Method class as just a Facade to a regular class, and all the static methods in your Extension class just call the real class, probably using a Singleton.

Community
  • 1
  • 1
Chris Moschini
  • 36,764
  • 19
  • 160
  • 190
3

We have improved our answer with detail explanation.Now it's more easy to understand about extension method

Extension method: It is a mechanism through which we can extend the behavior of existing class without using the sub classing or modifying or recompiling the original class or struct.

We can extend our custom classes ,.net framework classes etc.

Extension method is actually a special kind of static method that is defined in the static class.

As DateTime class is already taken above and hence we have not taken this class for the explanation.

Below is the example

//This is a existing Calculator class which have only one method(Add)

public class Calculator 
{
    public double Add(double num1, double num2)
    {
        return num1 + num2;
    }

}

// Below is the extension class which have one extension method.  
public static class Extension
{
    // It is extension method and it's first parameter is a calculator class.It's behavior is going to extend. 
    public static double Division(this Calculator cal, double num1,double num2){
       return num1 / num2;
    }   
}

// We have tested the extension method below.        
class Program
{
    static void Main(string[] args)
    {
        Calculator cal = new Calculator();
        double add=cal.Add(10, 10);
        // It is a extension method in Calculator class.
        double add=cal.Division(100, 10)

    }
}
Sheo Dayal Singh
  • 1,591
  • 19
  • 11
2

I would do the same as Kumu

namespace ExtensionMethods
{
    public static class MyExtensionMethods
    {
        public static DateTime Tomorrow(this DateTime date)
        {
           return date.AddDays(1);
        }    
    }
}

but call it like this new DateTime().Tomorrow();

Think it makes more seens than DateTime.Now.Tomorrow();

mimo
  • 937
  • 12
  • 19