As nearly everyone else mentioned, they did not overload the parameter, but in the first statement, there is not arguments provided for the function. In the second one though, an argument has been provided. Therefore a simple check typeof something == "undefined"
could easily modify and set apart the different results.
This is the relevant jQuery code making up the .val()
function (version 1.8.0):
val: function( value ) {
var hooks, ret, isFunction,
elem = this[0];
if ( !arguments.length ) {
if ( elem ) {
hooks = jQuery.valHooks[ elem.type ] || jQuery.valHooks[ elem.nodeName.toLowerCase() ];
if ( hooks && "get" in hooks && (ret = hooks.get( elem, "value" )) !== undefined ) {
return ret;
}
ret = elem.value;
return typeof ret === "string" ?
// handle most common string cases
ret.replace(rreturn, "") :
// handle cases where value is null/undef or number
ret == null ? "" : ret;
}
return;
}
isFunction = jQuery.isFunction( value );
return this.each(function( i ) {
var val,
self = jQuery(this);
if ( this.nodeType !== 1 ) {
return;
}
if ( isFunction ) {
val = value.call( this, i, self.val() );
} else {
val = value;
}
// Treat null/undefined as ""; convert numbers to string
if ( val == null ) {
val = "";
} else if ( typeof val === "number" ) {
val += "";
} else if ( jQuery.isArray( val ) ) {
val = jQuery.map(val, function ( value ) {
return value == null ? "" : value + "";
});
}
hooks = jQuery.valHooks[ this.type ] || jQuery.valHooks[ this.nodeName.toLowerCase() ];
// If set returns undefined, fall back to normal setting
if ( !hooks || !("set" in hooks) || hooks.set( this, val, "value" ) === undefined ) {
this.value = val;
}
});
}