96

How to add a method to a base type, say Array? In the global module this will be recognized

interface Array {
   remove(o): Array;
}

but where to put the actual implementation?

Fenton
  • 241,084
  • 71
  • 387
  • 401
Francois Vanderseypen
  • 1,432
  • 1
  • 12
  • 22

6 Answers6

153

You can use the prototype to extend Array:

interface Array<T> {
    remove(o: T): Array<T>;
}

Array.prototype.remove = function (o) {
    // code to remove "o"
    return this;
}

If you are within a module, you will need to make it clear that you are referring to the global Array<T>, not creating a local Array<T> interface within your module:

declare global {
    interface Array<T> {
        remove(o: T): Array<T>;
    }
}
Fenton
  • 241,084
  • 71
  • 387
  • 401
  • 1
    @FrancoisVanderseypen that could be a pain, I suggest you don't try it. It is easier the way proposed here. But if you are curious: http://stackoverflow.com/a/14001136/340760 – BrunoLM Dec 22 '13 at 19:41
  • it should be `interface Array { remove(o): T[]; }` in new version with generics – Mariusz Pawelski Feb 09 '14 at 00:04
  • @SteveFenton Hmm, can you elaborate? I can do such things in regular Node modules, why TypeScript forbids that? Do you know any workarounds? – Gill Bates Sep 14 '15 at 07:40
  • 1
    Definitions must be at the same level in order to take effect, so if you are in a module and you declare `interface Array` that is a member of the module, i.e. `MyModule.Array`. That means the global `Array` is not extended, but a new local interface is created. You have to put extensions in the global scope... I'd suggest putting the interface in a `.d.ts` file. Do you also need to patch the array definition or is it just the interface? – Fenton Sep 14 '15 at 09:54
  • On typescript 2.4.1 it needs added ```declare global {}``` on the interface declaration, otherwise it will trigger error – Pian0_M4n Jul 26 '17 at 07:49
  • @Pian0_M4n it depends where you add it - if you put it inside an external module then it needs to be forwarded to global, otherwise it appears to be a new interface scoped to the module, for example. – Fenton Jul 30 '17 at 12:41
  • What if the Array contains a list of objects? And we want to remove it based on that object keys. e-g; Person[] remove(o: [key in Person): T – Ali Sajid Dec 08 '22 at 10:21
72

declare global seems to be the ticket as of TypeScript 2.1. Note that Array.prototype is of type any[], so if you want to have your function implementation checked for consistency, best to add a generic type parameter yourself.

declare global {
  interface Array<T> {
    remove(elem: T): Array<T>;
  }
}

if (!Array.prototype.remove) {
  Array.prototype.remove = function<T>(this: T[], elem: T): T[] {
    return this.filter(e => e !== elem);
  }
}
Rikki Gibson
  • 4,136
  • 23
  • 34
20

Adding to Rikki Gibson's answer,

export {}

declare global {
    interface Array<T> {
        remove(elem: T): Array<T>;
    }
}

if (!Array.prototype.remove) {
  Array.prototype.remove = function<T>(elem: T): T[] {
      return this.filter(e => e !== elem);
  }
}

Without the export {}, you will get the TS error:

Augmentations for the global scope can only be directly nested in external modules or ambient module declarations.
Philippe Fanaro
  • 6,148
  • 6
  • 38
  • 76
GAF
  • 301
  • 3
  • 9
8

From TypeScript 1.6, you can "natively" extend arbitrary expressions like inbuilt types.

What's new in TypeScript:

TypeScript 1.6 adds support for classes extending arbitrary expression that computes a constructor function. This means that built-in types can now be extended in class declarations.

The extends clause of a class previously required a type reference to be specified. It now accepts an expression optionally followed by a type argument list. The type of the expression must be a constructor function type with at least one construct signature that has the same number of type parameters as the number of type arguments specified in the extends clause. The return type of the matching construct signature(s) is the base type from which the class instance type inherits. Effectively, this allows both real classes and "class-like" expressions to be specified in the extends clause.

// Extend built-in types

class MyArray extends Array<number> { }
class MyError extends Error { }

// Extend computed base class

class ThingA {
    getGreeting() { return "Hello from A"; }
}

class ThingB {
    getGreeting() { return "Hello from B"; }
}

interface Greeter {
    getGreeting(): string;
}

interface GreeterConstructor {
    new (): Greeter;
}

function getGreeterBase(): GreeterConstructor {
    return Math.random() >= 0.5 ? ThingA : ThingB;
}

class Test extends getGreeterBase() {
    sayHello() {
        console.log(this.getGreeting());
    }
}
Alex
  • 14,104
  • 11
  • 54
  • 77
  • 2
    This leads to problems, in that the `[]` operator fails to behave as expected. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/33947854/class-extended-from-built-in-array-in-typescript-1-6-2-does-not-update-length-wh – Andrew Shepherd Jul 19 '16 at 22:02
  • 1
    The question was how to extend Array.prototype not just class inheritance – Pavel Nazarov Jul 30 '20 at 13:19
7

Extending Array

Here is an example to extend Array and add the remove method to it. This is a JavaScript example

/** @template T */
class List extends Array {
  /**
   * Remove an item from the list and return the removed item
   * @param {T} item
   * @return {T}
   */
  remove(item) {
    const index = this.indexOf(item);
    if (index === -1) {
      throw new Error(`${item} not in list`);
    }
    this.splice(index, 1);
    return item;
  }
}

const arr = new List(1, 2, 3);
console.log(arr.remove(3)); // 3
console.log(arr); // [1, 2]

And this is a TypeScript example.

I've added a constructor and pushed the arguments of it to the array. (Couldn't do it with super(...items)!

class List<T> extends Array {
  constructor(...items: T[]) {
    super();
    this.push(...items);
  }

  public remove(item: T): T {
    const index = this.indexOf(item);
    if (index === -1) {
      throw new Error(`${item} not in list`);
    }
    this.splice(index, 1);
    return item;
  }
}
Zuhair Taha
  • 2,808
  • 2
  • 35
  • 33
4
class MyArray<T> extends Array<T> {
    remove: (elem: T) => Array<T> = function(elem: T) {
        return this.filter(e => e !== elem);
    }
}
let myArr = new MyArray<string>();
myArr.remove("some");

this works for me with typescript v2.2.1!

chenxu
  • 57
  • 1
  • 7
    This problem with this approach is that now every array has to be of the type `MyArray`, so it won't work seamlessly with other libraries that return arrays. – Jan Aagaard Jul 18 '18 at 20:59
  • 3
    The question was how to extend Array.prototype not just class inheritance – Pavel Nazarov Jul 30 '20 at 13:19