While I think Erwin's solution is probably preferable if you can re-structure your tables, an alternative that doesn't require any schema changes is to write a PL/PgSQL function that scans the tables using dynamic SQL based on the system catalog information.
Given:
CREATE SCHEMA a;
CREATE SCHEMA b;
CREATE TABLE a.testtab ( searchval text );
CREATE TABLE b.testtab (LIKE a.testtab);
INSERT INTO a.testtab(searchval) VALUES ('ham');
INSERT INTO b.testtab(searchval) VALUES ('eggs');
The following PL/PgSQL function searches all schemas containing tables named _tabname
for values in _colname
equal to _value
and returns the first matching schema.
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION find_schema_for_value(_tabname text, _colname text, _value text) RETURNS text AS $$
DECLARE
cur_schema text;
foundval integer;
BEGIN
FOR cur_schema IN
SELECT nspname
FROM pg_class c
INNER JOIN pg_namespace n ON (c.relnamespace = n.oid)
WHERE c.relname = _tabname AND c.relkind = 'r'
LOOP
EXECUTE
format('SELECT 1 FROM %I.%I WHERE %I = $1',
cur_schema, _tabname, _colname
) INTO foundval USING _value;
IF foundval = 1 THEN
RETURN cur_schema;
END IF;
END LOOP;
RETURN NULL;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE 'plpgsql';
If there are are no matches then null is returned. If there are multiple matches the result will be one of them, but no guarantee is made about which one. Add an ORDER BY
clause to the schema query if you want to return (say) the first in alphabetical order or something. The function is also trivially modified to return setof text
and RETURN NEXT cur_schema
if you want to return all the matches.
regress=# SELECT find_schema_for_value('testtab','searchval','ham');
find_schema_for_value
-----------------------
a
(1 row)
regress=# SELECT find_schema_for_value('testtab','searchval','eggs');
find_schema_for_value
-----------------------
b
(1 row)
regress=# SELECT find_schema_for_value('testtab','searchval','bones');
find_schema_for_value
-----------------------
(1 row)
By the way, you can re-use the table definitions without inheritance if you want, and you really should. Either use a common composite data type:
CREATE TYPE public.testtab AS ( searchval text );
CREATE TABLE a.testtab OF public.testtab;
CREATE TABLE b.testtab OF public.testtab;
in which case they share the same data type but not any data; or or via LIKE
:
CREATE TABLE public.testtab ( searchval text );
CREATE TABLE a.testtab (LIKE public.testtab);
CREATE TABLE b.testtab (LIKE public.testtab);
in which case they're completely unconnected to each other after creation.