I started off learning Python on OS X 10.6 (Snow Leopard) with a python.org Python dmg. I think I've seen this called "MacPython" on SO, but I'm also thinking that this MacPython (currently Google's top hit for "MacPython") is different, right?
Although I felt like my python.org Python 3.3.0 install was working reasonably well for me initially (using distribute
, easy_install
, and pip
, I installed several new packages including IPython
), I'd like to start using Emacs IPython Notebook (EIN) and Scipy, and it's clear to me that this kind of arrangement is going to require a lot of additional stuff from the CheeseShop. Plus, I've been very happily using MacPorts for GNU Emacs and other unix (non-Python) packages for a long time, so I'm thinking that it might be a good idea to move all my Python work (I'm focused on learning py3) away from what I have now with the python.org install and into MacPorts Python.
Is that a good idea? IOW, am I likely to be making for a great deal of extra time/work/headache for myself (like the headaches that @davidavr writes about here when he writes, "MacPorts would pull down and install the full Python 2.4 distro along with the library.") for very little gain or is the benefit of using a package manager like MacPorts for my Python stuff going to be a big timesaver like I suspect it might be?
I've read many other threads here (most rather old) that partly relate, but don't feel like there's anything recent that really addresses my question, and I encountered lots of older advice where it was clear that newer advice conflicted, so I'm asking what may be considered a duplicate, but if it is, I can't help thinking that the passage of several years may have changed some of the answers to older similar questions.