4

What's the best way to check for not null values in java.

String query ="abcd";

query != null vs !query.equals(null).

which is better?why?

Rohit Jain
  • 209,639
  • 45
  • 409
  • 525
yonikawa
  • 581
  • 1
  • 9
  • 32

4 Answers4

26

1st one is better (and the only option), because 2nd one will throw NPE, when your value is actually null. As simple as that.

Try this out:

String str = null;
str.equals(null);  // will throw `NPE`.

So basically, the test which you wanted to perform itself triggers a NullPointerException in the 2nd case. So, it is no choice.

Rohit Jain
  • 209,639
  • 45
  • 409
  • 525
11

!str.equals(null) will

  1. always return false if it does not throw an exception, and
  2. throw an exception if str is null

The point of a null check is to make sure the reference, in this code str, actually refers to an object. If it is null, you can't call any methods on it, including equals, without throwing a NullPointerException... which the point of null checks is to avoid happening.

So !str.equals(null) causes the very problem null checks are meant to prevent and doesn't do what you think at all. Never do this.

djechlin
  • 59,258
  • 35
  • 162
  • 290
  • +1, i made the same point about `str.equals(null)` would always return false, but my answer not clear about the concrete question.. :) – PermGenError Feb 13 '13 at 21:11
2

query != null better as !query.equals(null) will throw an exception when query is actually null. Also query != null is easily readable

Syst3m_NZ
  • 56
  • 4
2

query != null compares if the object is null. query.equals("something") compares the value inside of that object. string == "something". so in this case use query != null.

exexzian
  • 7,782
  • 6
  • 41
  • 52
grepit
  • 21,260
  • 6
  • 105
  • 81