I'm trying to replace an @Autowired
object with a Mockito mock object. The usual way of doing this was with xml using Springockito:
<mockito:mock id="SomeMock" class="com.package.MockInterface" />
Currently I'm trying to move over to using Spring's JavaConfig to do the job. All of a sudden the Java expressions are a whole lot more verbose than xml:
@RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
@ContextConfiguration
public class MyTestClass {
@Configuration
static class Config {
@Bean
public MockInterface somethingSpecial() {
return Mockito.mock(MockInterface.class);
}
}
@Autowired MockInterface mockObj;
// test code
}
I discovered a library called Springockito-annotations, which allows you to do the following:
@RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
@ContextConfiguration(loader=SpringockitoContextLoader.class)
public class MyTestClass {
@Autowired @ReplaceWithMock MockInterface mockObj;
// test code
}
Clearly, a whole lot prettier :) The only problem is that this context loader doesn't allow me to use @Configuration
and JavaConfig for other beans (if I do, Spring complains that there are no candidates that match those autowired fields).
Do you guys know of a way to get Spring's JavaConfig and Springockito-annotations to play nice? Alternatively, is there another shorthand for creating mocks?
As a nice bonus, using Springockito and xml config, I was able to mock out concrete classes without providing autowiring candidates to its dependencies (if it had any). Is this not possible without xml?