I have a question about XACML policies which I am using with WSO2 Balana library.
Having a policy:
<Policy xmlns="urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:3.0:core:schema:wd-17" PolicyId="Policy1" RuleCombiningAlgId="urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:rule-combining-algorithm:first-applicable" Version="1.0">
<Target>
<AnyOf>
<AllOf>
<Match MatchId="urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:function:string-equal">
<AttributeValue DataType="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">MyApp</AttributeValue>
<AttributeDesignator AttributeId="urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:resource:resource-id"
Category="urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:3.0:attribute-category:resource" DataType="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string" MustBePresent="true"/>
</Match>
</AllOf>
</AnyOf>
</Target>
<Rule Effect="Permit" RuleId="RuleFor_user1_myapp">
<Target>
<AnyOf>
<AllOf>
<Match MatchId="urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:function:string-equal">
<AttributeValue DataType="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">user1</AttributeValue>
<AttributeDesignator AttributeId="http://example.site.com/id/user"
Category="urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:subject-category:access-subject"
DataType="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string" MustBePresent="true"/>
</Match>
</AllOf>
</AnyOf>
</Target>
<Apply FunctionId="urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:function:string-at-least-one-member-of">
<Apply FunctionId="urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:function:string-bag">
<AttributeValue DataType="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">READ</AttributeValue>
</Apply>
<AttributeDesignator AttributeId="urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:action:action-id" Category="urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:3.0:attribute-category:action" DataType="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string" MustBePresent="true"/>
</Apply>
</Rule>
</Policy>
It should define that user1 has only READ permission on MyApp.
I have a request to evaluate, which asks if user1 has READ permissions, and I am getting "Permit" in the response, which is OK.
But when I have a request to evaluate which asks if user1 has WRITE permissions, I am getting also "Permit", instead of "Not applicable".
Can someone tell me is the policy is correct to produce an outcome I have just described?
Thank you in advance!
Best regards, Jurica Krizanic