Is it possible to access an object's private variables using an extension method?
7 Answers
No. You can do the same in an extension method as in a "normal" static method in some utility class.
So this extension method
public static void SomeMethod(this string s)
{
// do something with 's'
}
is equivalent to some static helper method like this (at least regarding what you can access):
public static void SomeStringMethod(string s)
{
// do something with 's'
}
(Of course you could use some reflection in either method to access private members. But I guess that's not the point of this question.)

- 94,805
- 45
- 217
- 260
-
4+1. As an aside, you can have private extension methods; there's a nice article on this at http://odetocode.com/Blogs/scott/archive/2009/10/05/private-extension-methods.aspx Extension methods can also access private static members of their static utility class. – TrueWill Oct 10 '09 at 16:49
-
3Even though this is tagged as C#, this applies to any of the .NET languages which provide support for extension methods. – Scott Dorman Oct 10 '09 at 17:25
-
1@TrueWill - but since they must be static, non-nested, non-generic types, they can't really have private access to any *object's* variables. `internal` access, sure - but not `private`. – Marc Gravell Oct 10 '09 at 22:31
No it cannot.
However, you will be interested to know that the other answers are incorrect in saying that normal static methods cannot access private fields. A static method can access private non-static member fields in its own class. The following code is perfectly valid and shows a static method accessing a private field:
public class Foo
{
private bool _field;
public static bool GetField(Foo foo)
{
return foo._field;
}
}
Now... back to your question. You might think that an extension method should be able to do the same thing, given the (non-existent) "equivalence" to static methods that other answers claim exists. However, you cannot declare extension methods inside a nested class. So if you try to do the following:
public class Foo
{
private bool _field;
public static class Extensions
{
public static bool GetField(this Foo foo)
{
return foo._field;
}
}
}
You will get a compile error saying
Extension method must be defined in a top level static class; Extensions is a nested class
Note that, interestingly enough, removing the this
keyword causes the code to compile fine. The reasons for this are discussed here:

- 1
- 1

- 13,225
- 9
- 67
- 88
No:
public class Foo
{
private string bar;
}
public static class FooExtensions
{
public static void Test(this Foo foo)
{
// Compile error here: Foo.bar is inaccessible due to its protection level
var bar = foo.bar;
}
}

- 1,023,142
- 271
- 3,287
- 2,928
Use Reflection
Not recommended, but you could possibly access any private variable of any type using another extension method like so:
public static T GetFieldValue<T>(this object obj, string name) {
var field = obj.GetType().GetField(name, BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Instance);
return (T)field?.GetValue(obj);
}
And then access a private field of an arbitrary type:
Foo foo = new Foo();
string privateBar = foo.GetFieldValue<string>("_bar");

- 7,761
- 5
- 38
- 46
No, unless you give some kind of access to them through public properties or a proxy pattern.

- 67,283
- 14
- 105
- 142
If you own the class that you are extending, you can always declare the class partial, then extend the class and have access to all the private members in a different file... But you wouldn't really be using extension methods.

- 9,564
- 146
- 81
- 122

- 21
- 1
An extension method is essentially a static method so all you have access to are the public members of the instance on which the extension method is invoked on

- 6,562
- 8
- 50
- 93