You are assuming that 101 is three bits long. Java doesn't support variable length bit operations, it operates on a whole int
of bits, so ~
will be the not
of a 32 bit long "101".
--- Edited after being asked "How can I fix this?" ---
That's a really good question, but the answer is a mix of "you can't" and "you can achieve the same thing by different means".
You can't fix the ~
operator, as it does what it does. It would sort of be like asking to fix +
to only add the 1's place. Just not going to happen.
You can achieve the desired operation, but you need a bit more "stuff" to get it going. First you must have something (another int) that specifies the bits of interest. This is typically called a bit mask.
int mask = 0x00000007; // just the last 3 bits.
int masked_inverse = (~value) & mask;
Note that what we did was really invert 32 bits, then zeroed out 29 of those bits; because, they were set to zero in the mask, which means "we don't care about them". This can also be imagined as leveraging the &
operator such that we say "if set and we care about it, set it".
Now you will still have 32 bits, but only the lower 3 will be inverted. If you want a 3 bit data structure, then that's a different story. Java (and most languages) just don't support such things directly. So, you might be tempted to add another type to Java to support that. Java adds types via a class mechanism, but the built-in types are not changeable. This means you could write a class to represent a 3 bit data structure, but it will have to handle ints internally as 32 bit fields.
Fortunately for you, someone has already done this. It is part of the standard Java library, and is called a BitSet
.
BitSet threeBits = new BitSet(3);
threeBits.set(2); // set bit index 2
threeBits.set(0); // set bit index 0
threeBits.flip(0,3);
However, such bit manipulations have a different feel to them due to the constraints of the Class / Object system in Java, which follows from defining classes as the only way to add new types in Java.