What is the most efficient way to create list of the same number with n elements?
Asked
Active
Viewed 2.0k times
1 Answers
16
number = 1
elements = 1000
thelist = [number] * elements
>>> [1] * 10
[1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]
NB: Don't try to duplicate mutable objects (notably lists of lists) like that, or this will happen:
In [23]: a = [[0]] * 10
In [24]: a
Out[24]: [[0], [0], [0], [0], [0], [0], [0], [0], [0], [0]]
In [25]: a[0][0] = 1
In [26]: a
Out[26]: [[1], [1], [1], [1], [1], [1], [1], [1], [1], [1]]
If you are using numpy, for multidimensional lists numpy.repeat
is your best bet. It can repeat arrays of all shapes over separate axes.

Pavel Anossov
- 60,842
- 14
- 151
- 124
-
2The question is tagged `numpy` too, so maybe mention `numpy.repeat(1, 10)`? (Although it'll be slower than multiplying a list until `n` is really big.) – DSM Mar 30 '13 at 23:05
-
2Note that this may have unexpected results (depending on how much you know of how Python variables work) with mutable types - it produces a list of references to the same object. – Gareth Latty Mar 30 '13 at 23:08
-
1To honor the numpy tag, `a = np.empty((elements,), dtype=np.int); a.fill(number)` is much faster than `[number] * elements` for higher values of `elements`. But the return is not a real list. – Jaime Mar 31 '13 at 02:46
-
2@Jaime: Also note that `empty` + `fill` is faster than `repeat` – Warren Weckesser Mar 31 '13 at 02:55