122

I have the following

data.AppendFormat("{0},",dataToAppend);

The problem with this is that I am using it in a loop and there will be a trailing comma. What is the best way to remove the trailing comma?

Do I have to change data to a string and then substring it?

Giorgos Betsos
  • 71,379
  • 9
  • 63
  • 98
Wesley Skeen
  • 7,977
  • 13
  • 42
  • 56
  • 12
    `string.Join(",", yourCollection)`? Edit: added as answer. – Vlad Jun 20 '13 at 13:36
  • 1
    did you try http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5701163/removing-a-character-from-my-stringbuilder? – andreister Jun 20 '13 at 13:37
  • 1
    @Chris: this way you don't need a StringBuilder at all. – Vlad Jun 20 '13 at 13:37
  • maybe you can avoid adding the comma instead of removing it afterwards. See: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/581448/join-a-string-using-delimiters (Jon Skeet's answer) – Paolo Falabella Jun 20 '13 at 13:38
  • @Vlad Yeah sorry, I misread that; I thought you were offering it as a suggestion to alter the final-built string, not as a replacement for his loop altogether. (I thought I deleted my comment in time, guess not!) – Chris Sinclair Jun 20 '13 at 13:38
  • http://stackoverflow.com/questions/799446/creating-a-comma-separated-list-from-iliststring-or-ienumerablestring – Sam Leach Jun 20 '13 at 13:39
  • You should probably retitle the question since it's not what's needed for the solution. But as posted in the duplicates the easiest way to take characters off the end of a StringBuilder is to reduce its length. – Chris Jun 20 '13 at 13:41
  • The 'duplicate' question is not really (at least not any more). This asks for the last character; the other question http://stackoverflow.com/q/5701163/292060 asks for the last of a certain character (comma), which may not be the last in the string. – goodeye Jun 25 '15 at 22:14

13 Answers13

283

The simplest and most efficient way is to perform this command:

data.Length--;

by doing this you move the pointer (i.e. last index) back one character but you don't change the mutability of the object. In fact, clearing a StringBuilder is best done with Length as well (but do actually use the Clear() method for clarity instead because that's what its implementation looks like):

data.Length = 0;

again, because it doesn't change the allocation table. Think of it like saying, I don't want to recognize these bytes anymore. Now, even when calling ToString(), it won't recognize anything past its Length, well, it can't. It's a mutable object that allocates more space than what you provide it, it's simply built this way.

Mike Perrenoud
  • 66,820
  • 29
  • 157
  • 232
  • 2
    re `data.Length = 0;`: that's exactly what `StringBuilder.Clear` does, so it's preferable to use `StringBuilder.Clear` for clarity of intention. – Eren Ersönmez Jun 20 '13 at 13:49
  • @ErenErsönmez, fair enough friend, I should have more clearly stated that's what `Clear()` does, but funny thing. That's the **first line** of the `Clear()` method. But, did you know the interface actually then issues a `return this;`. Now that's the thing that kills me. Setting the `Length = 0` changes the reference you already have, why return yourself? – Mike Perrenoud Jun 20 '13 at 13:52
  • 12
    I think it's for being able to use in a "fluent" manner. `Append` returns itself as well. – Eren Ersönmez Jun 20 '13 at 13:58
53

Just use

string.Join(",", yourCollection)

This way you don't need the StringBuilder and the loop.




Long addition about async case. As of 2019, it's not a rare setup when the data are coming asynchronously.

In case your data are in async collection, there is no string.Join overload taking IAsyncEnumerable<T>. But it's easy to create one manually, hacking the code from string.Join:

public static class StringEx
{
    public static async Task<string> JoinAsync<T>(string separator, IAsyncEnumerable<T> seq)
    {
        if (seq == null)
            throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(seq));

        await using (var en = seq.GetAsyncEnumerator())
        {
            if (!await en.MoveNextAsync())
                return string.Empty;

            string firstString = en.Current?.ToString();

            if (!await en.MoveNextAsync())
                return firstString ?? string.Empty;

            // Null separator and values are handled by the StringBuilder
            var sb = new StringBuilder(256);
            sb.Append(firstString);

            do
            {
                var currentValue = en.Current;
                sb.Append(separator);
                if (currentValue != null)
                    sb.Append(currentValue);
            }
            while (await en.MoveNextAsync());
            return sb.ToString();
        }
    }
}

If the data are coming asynchronously but the interface IAsyncEnumerable<T> is not supported (like the mentioned in comments SqlDataReader), it's relatively easy to wrap the data into an IAsyncEnumerable<T>:

async IAsyncEnumerable<(object first, object second, object product)> ExtractData(
        SqlDataReader reader)
{
    while (await reader.ReadAsync())
        yield return (reader[0], reader[1], reader[2]);
}

and use it:

Task<string> Stringify(SqlDataReader reader) =>
    StringEx.JoinAsync(
        ", ",
        ExtractData(reader).Select(x => $"{x.first} * {x.second} = {x.product}"));

In order to use Select, you'll need to use nuget package System.Interactive.Async. Here you can find a compilable example.

Vlad
  • 35,022
  • 6
  • 77
  • 199
14

How about this..

string str = "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog,";
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(str);
sb.Remove(str.Length - 1, 1);
Pankaj
  • 2,618
  • 3
  • 25
  • 47
13

Use the following after the loop.

.TrimEnd(',')

or simply change to

string commaSeparatedList = input.Aggregate((a, x) => a + ", " + x)
Sam Leach
  • 12,746
  • 9
  • 45
  • 73
11

I prefer manipulating the length of the stringbuilder:

data.Length = data.Length - 1;
bastos.sergio
  • 6,684
  • 4
  • 26
  • 36
  • 4
    Why not simply `data.Length--` or `--data.Length`? – iCollect.it Ltd Feb 07 '14 at 12:40
  • 1
    I usually use data.Length-- but in one case I had to move back 2 characters because of a blank value after the character I wanted to remove. Trim did not work in that case either so data.Length = data.Length - 2; worked. – Caverman Jul 29 '19 at 21:01
  • Trim returns a new instance of a string, it does not alter the contents of the stringbuilder object – bastos.sergio Jul 30 '19 at 15:48
  • 1
    @GoneCoding Visual Basic .NET doesn't support `--` or `++` You can use `data.Length -= 1` though, or this answer will work too. – Jason S May 14 '20 at 23:21
5

Gotcha!!

Most of the answers on this thread won't work if you use AppendLine like below:

var builder = new StringBuilder();
builder.AppendLine("One,");
builder.Length--; // Won't work
Console.Write(builder.ToString());

builder = new StringBuilder();
builder.AppendLine("One,");
builder.Length += -1; // Won't work
Console.Write(builder.ToString());

builder = new StringBuilder();
builder.AppendLine("One,");
Console.Write(builder.TrimEnd(',')); // Won't work

Fiddle Me

WHY??? @(&**(&@!!

The issue is simple but took me a while to figure it out: Because there are 2 more invisible characters at the end CR and LF (Carriage Return and Line Feed). Therefore, you need to take away 3 last characters:

var builder = new StringBuilder();
builder.AppendLine("One,");
builder.Length -= 3; // This will work
Console.WriteLine(builder.ToString());

In Conclusion

Use Length-- or Length -= 1 if the last method you called was Append. Use Length =- 3 if you the last method you called AppendLine.

CodingYoshi
  • 25,467
  • 4
  • 62
  • 64
3

I recommend, you change your loop algorithm:

  • Add the comma not AFTER the item, but BEFORE
  • Use a boolean variable, that starts with false, do suppress the first comma
  • Set this boolean variable to true after testing it
Eugen Rieck
  • 64,175
  • 10
  • 70
  • 92
3

You should use the string.Join method to turn a collection of items into a comma delimited string. It will ensure that there is no leading or trailing comma, as well as ensure the string is constructed efficiently (without unnecessary intermediate strings).

Servy
  • 202,030
  • 26
  • 332
  • 449
3

The most simple way would be to use the Join() method:

public static void Trail()
{
    var list = new List<string> { "lala", "lulu", "lele" };
    var data = string.Join(",", list);
}

If you really need the StringBuilder, trim the end comma after the loop:

data.ToString().TrimEnd(',');
studert
  • 137
  • 4
2

Yes, convert it to a string once the loop is done:

String str = data.ToString().TrimEnd(',');
DonBoitnott
  • 10,787
  • 6
  • 49
  • 68
2

You have two options. First one is very easy use Remove method it is quite effective. Second way is to use ToString with start index and end index (MSDN documentation)

Piotr Stapp
  • 19,392
  • 11
  • 68
  • 116
2

Similar SO question here.

I liked the using a StringBuilder extension method.

RemoveLast Method

Community
  • 1
  • 1
MrB
  • 424
  • 2
  • 9
0

Simply shortens the stringbuilder length by 1;

 StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
 sb.Length--;

i know this is not the effective way as it translates to sb = sb-1;

Alternative Effective solution

sb.Remove(starting_index, how_many_character_to_delete);

for our case it would be

sb.Remove(sb.length-1,1)
gouravm
  • 301
  • 1
  • 12