Undefined reference std::pair

Question

One would think that this simple piece of code should compile easily:

#include <utility>

struct Q {
    static const int X = 0;
};

int main() {
    std::pair<int, int>(Q::X, 0);
    return 0;
}

However, when I compile this with g++ using the default settings (cygwin gcc 4.5.3) it throws a linker error at me:

undefined reference to `Q::X'

I'm totally stumped here -- MSVC compiles this just fine yet my gcc does not. (MinGW also works fine.)

score 3 · Accepted Answer · answered Jul 15 '13 at 09:14

3

The linker fails to find definition of Q::X.

This is probably because std::pair<> constructor takes arguments as references to const, and Q::X is an l-value, hence it requires an external definition of Q::X to be able to refer to that.

A portable fix:

int const Q::X;

answered Jul 15 '13 at 09:14

Maxim Egorushkin

131,725
17
180
271

1

Well that's unfortunate; I have like a dozen of these `static const` definitions inside a traits(-like) class so it would be quite a burden to duplicate them outside. I think I'll just cast it to a value instead so it doesn't try to take a reference. Thanks for the help! – Rufflewind Jul 15 '13 at 09:35

score 1 · Answer 2 · answered Jul 15 '13 at 09:25

1

You only declare X but you must also define it, which, for static definitions must happen outside the class

struct Q {
static const int X = 0;
};
int Q::X = 0;

answered Jul 15 '13 at 09:25

ogni42

1,232
7
11

score 1 · Answer 3 · edited May 23 '17 at 12:05

1

@Maxim Yegorushkin (Beat me to it!) Here is a relevant link that might help.

But your problem is that the int is never externally defined. If X doesn't have to be const, you can initialize it outside the struct in a similar manner. The main reason is because X is static...

struct Q {
   static const int X;
};
int const Q::X = 0;

struct Q {
   static int X;
};
int Q::X = 0;

edited May 23 '17 at 12:05

Community

1
1

answered Jul 15 '13 at 09:25

Jonathan

1,126
10
19

Undefined reference std::pair

3 Answers3