Is there any other argument than key
, for example: value
?
-
1well, does it work? and what exactly is it supposed to do. – Ritwik Bose Dec 29 '09 at 02:52
3 Answers
Arguments of sort
and sorted
Both sort
and sorted
have three keyword arguments: cmp
, key
and reverse
.
L.sort(cmp=None, key=None, reverse=False) -- stable sort *IN PLACE*;
cmp(x, y) -> -1, 0, 1
sorted(iterable, cmp=None, key=None, reverse=False) --> new sorted list
Using key
and reverse
is preferred, because they work much faster than an equivalent cmp
.
key
should be a function which takes an item and returns a value to compare and sort by. reverse
allows to reverse sort order.
Using key
argument
You can use operator.itemgetter
as a key argument to sort by second, third etc. item in a tuple.
Example
>>> from operator import itemgetter
>>> a = range(5)
>>> b = a[::-1]
>>> c = map(lambda x: chr(((x+3)%5)+97), a)
>>> sequence = zip(a,b,c)
# sort by first item in a tuple
>>> sorted(sequence, key = itemgetter(0))
[(0, 4, 'd'), (1, 3, 'e'), (2, 2, 'a'), (3, 1, 'b'), (4, 0, 'c')]
# sort by second item in a tuple
>>> sorted(sequence, key = itemgetter(1))
[(4, 0, 'c'), (3, 1, 'b'), (2, 2, 'a'), (1, 3, 'e'), (0, 4, 'd')]
# sort by third item in a tuple
>>> sorted(sequence, key = itemgetter(2))
[(2, 2, 'a'), (3, 1, 'b'), (4, 0, 'c'), (0, 4, 'd'), (1, 3, 'e')]
Explanation
Sequences can contain any objects, not even comparable, but if we can define a function which produces something we can compare for each of the items, we can pass this function in key
argument to sort
or sorted
.
itemgetter
, in particular, creates such a function that fetches the given item from its operand. An example from its documentation:
After,
f=itemgetter(2)
, the callf(r)
returnsr[2]
.
Mini-benchmark, key
vs cmp
Just out of curiosity, key
and cmp
performance compared, smaller is better:
>>> from timeit import Timer
>>> Timer(stmt="sorted(xs,key=itemgetter(1))",setup="from operator import itemgetter;xs=range(100);xs=zip(xs,xs);").timeit(300000)
6.7079150676727295
>>> Timer(stmt="sorted(xs,key=lambda x:x[1])",setup="xs=range(100);xs=zip(xs,xs);").timeit(300000)
11.609490871429443
>>> Timer(stmt="sorted(xs,cmp=lambda a,b: cmp(a[1],b[1]))",setup="xs=range(100);xs=zip(xs,xs);").timeit(300000)
22.335839986801147
So, sorting with key
seems to be at least twice as fast as sorting with cmp
. Using itemgetter
instead of lambda x: x[1]
makes sort even faster.

- 40,473
- 13
- 103
- 130
-
How can this work: `modNames.sort(key=lambda a: (a in data) and data.index(a))` (modNames, data are lists) ? – Mr_and_Mrs_D Oct 29 '14 at 20:37
-
Well, items in `modNames` that are in `data` will be sorted as they are in `data` - items that are not will be assigned key 0 and sorted in the beginning of the list along with the first item in data that also has key 0. – Mr_and_Mrs_D Jul 30 '19 at 10:35
-
Besides key=
, the sort
method of lists in Python 2.x could alternatively take a cmp=
argument (not a good idea, it's been removed in Python 3); with either or none of these two, you can always pass reverse=True
to have the sort go downwards (instead of upwards as is the default, and which you can also request explicitly with reverse=False
if you're really keen to do that for some reason). I have no idea what that value
argument you're mentioning is supposed to do.

- 32,567
- 20
- 113
- 146

- 854,459
- 170
- 1,222
- 1,395
-
He just said "value" as an (out of place here) example because he's seen "key" and "value" mentioned together. – tzot Jan 08 '10 at 04:32
Yes, it takes other arguments, but no value
.
>>> print list.sort.__doc__
L.sort(cmp=None, key=None, reverse=False) -- stable sort *IN PLACE*;
cmp(x, y) -> -1, 0, 1
What would a value
argument even mean?

- 198,619
- 38
- 280
- 391
-
3
-
1I usually use ipython, and there one can write just `list.sort?` instead of `help(list.sort)` to get help. – sastanin Dec 29 '09 at 09:37