Taken from http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/riddles/cs.shtml
It looks very compiler specific to me. Don't know where to look for?
Taken from http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/riddles/cs.shtml
It looks very compiler specific to me. Don't know where to look for?
typedef
s(Note that the struct
needs to be declared in an inner scope so that it takes precedence over the outer name in C++.)
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void)
{
char x;
{
struct x { char dummy[2]; };
printf("%s\n", sizeof (x) == 1 ? "C" : "C++");
}
}
A similar version that doesn't rely on the ambiguity between sizeof (type)
and sizeof (variable)
, using only types:
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void)
{
typedef char t;
{
struct t { char dummy[2]; };
printf("%s\n", sizeof (t) == 1 ? "C" : "C++");
}
}
struct
/class
equivalence, automatic typedef
s, and automatically-generated default constructors#include <stdio.h>
int isC = 0;
void Foo() { isC = 1; }
int main(void)
{
struct Foo { int dummy; };
Foo();
printf("%s\n", isC ? "C" : "C++");
}
struct
declarations in CAlso see Symbol clashing of inner and outer structs, C++ vs C
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void)
{
typedef struct inner { int dummy; } t;
{
struct outer { struct inner { t dummy[2]; } dummy; };
printf("%s\n",
sizeof (struct inner) == sizeof (t)
? "C++"
: "C");
}
}
//
commentsThis won't work with C99 or with C89 compilers that support //
as an extension.
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void)
{
printf("%s\n",
0 //* */
+1
? "C++"
: "C");
}
or alternatively:
printf("%s\n",
1 //* */ 2
? "C++"
: "C");
sizeof
differences with char
literalsNote that this isn't guaranteed to be portable since it's possible that some hypothetical platform could use bytes with more than 8 bits, in which case sizeof(char)
could be the same as sizeof(int)
. (Also see Can sizeof(int) ever be 1 on a hosted implementation?)
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void)
{
printf("%s\n", sizeof 'a' == 1 ? "C++" : "C");
}
This is based off of the 5.16, 5.17, 5.18 example in the ISO C++03 standard, and it works in gcc but not in MSVC (possibly due to a compiler bug?).
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void)
{
void* array[2];
printf("%s\n",
(sizeof (((void) 0), array) / sizeof (void*) == 1)
? "C"
: "C++");
}
This one isn't strictly legal, but some compilers are lax.
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void)
{
int isCPP = 1;
printf("%s\n", (1 ? isCPP : isCPP = 0) ? "C++" : "C");
}
(You also could check for the __cplusplus
preprocessor macro (or various other macros), but I think that doesn't follow the spirit of the question.)
I have implementations for all of these at: http://www.taenarum.com/csua/fun-with-c/c-or-cpp.c
We had to do a similar assignment at school. We were not allowed to use preprocessor (except for #include
of course). The following code uses the fact that in C, type names and structure names form separate namespaces whereas in C++ they don't.
#include <stdio.h>
typedef int X;
int main()
{
struct X { int ch[2]; };
if (sizeof(X) != sizeof(struct X))
printf("C\n");
else
printf("C++\n");
}
Simple enough.
#include <stdio.h>
int main(int argc, char ** argv) {
#ifdef __cplusplus
printf("C++\n");
#else
printf("C\n");
#endif
return 0;
}
Or is there a requirement to do this without the official standard?
puts(sizeof('a') == sizeof(int) ? "C" : "C++");
Just look to see if the __STDC__
and __cplusplus
compiler macros are defined.
I'm guessing the intent is to write something that depends on differences between the languages themselves, not just predefined macros. Though it's technically not absolutely guaranteed to work, something like this is probably closer to what's desired:
int main() {
char *names[] = { "C", "C++"};
printf("%s\n", names[sizeof(char)==sizeof('C')]);
return 0;
}
For what it's worth, here's another answer:
char x[sizeof(char *)+2], y[1];
printf("%.*s\n", sizeof(1?x:y)-sizeof(char *)+1, "C++");
You could try preprocessor directives, but that might not be what they are looking for.