Introduction
Quite now your matching conditions may be too broad. However, you can use levenshtein distance to check your words. It may be not too easy to fulfill all desired goals with it, like sound similarity. Thus, I'm suggesting to split your issue into some other issues.
For example, you can create some custom checker which will use passed callable input which takes two strings and then answering question about are they same (for levenshtein that will be distance lesser than some value, for similar_text - some percent of similarity e t.c. - it's up to you to define rules).
Similarity, based on words
Well, all of built-in functions will fail if we are talking about case when you're looking for partial match - especially if it's about non-ordered match. Thus, you'll need to create more complex comparison tool. You have:
- Data string (that will be in DB, for example). It looks like D = D0 D1 D2 ... Dn
- Search string (that will be user input). It looks like S = S0 S1 ... Sm
Here space symbols means just any space (I assume that space symbols will not affect similarity). Also n > m. With this definition your issue is about - to find set of m words in D which will be similar to S. By set I mean any unordered sequence. Hence, if we'll found any such sequence in D, then S is similar to D.
Obviously, if n < m then input contains more words than data string. In this case you may either think that they are not similar or act like above, but switch data and input (that, however, looks a little bit odd, but is applicable in some sense)
Implementation
To do the stuff, you'll need to be able to create set of string which are parts from m words from D. Based on my this question you can do this with:
protected function nextAssoc($assoc)
{
if(false !== ($pos = strrpos($assoc, '01')))
{
$assoc[$pos] = '1';
$assoc[$pos+1] = '0';
return substr($assoc, 0, $pos+2).
str_repeat('0', substr_count(substr($assoc, $pos+2), '0')).
str_repeat('1', substr_count(substr($assoc, $pos+2), '1'));
}
return false;
}
protected function getAssoc(array $data, $count=2)
{
if(count($data)<$count)
{
return null;
}
$assoc = str_repeat('0', count($data)-$count).str_repeat('1', $count);
$result = [];
do
{
$result[]=array_intersect_key($data, array_filter(str_split($assoc)));
}
while($assoc=$this->nextAssoc($assoc));
return $result;
}
-so for any array, getAssoc() will return array of unordered selections consisting from m items each.
Next step is about order in produced selection. We should search both Niels Andersen and Andersen Niels in our D string. Therefore, you'll need to be able to create permutations for array. It's very common issue, but I'll put my version here too:
protected function getPermutations(array $input)
{
if(count($input)==1)
{
return [$input];
}
$result = [];
foreach($input as $key=>$element)
{
foreach($this->getPermutations(array_diff_key($input, [$key=>0])) as $subarray)
{
$result[] = array_merge([$element], $subarray);
}
}
return $result;
}
After this you'll be able to create selections of m words and then, permutating each of them, get all variants for compare with search string S. That comparison each time will be done via some callback, such as levenshtein. Here's sample:
public function checkMatch($search, callable $checker=null, array $args=[], $return=false)
{
$data = preg_split('/\s+/', strtolower($this->data), -1, PREG_SPLIT_NO_EMPTY);
$search = trim(preg_replace('/\s+/', ' ', strtolower($search)));
foreach($this->getAssoc($data, substr_count($search, ' ')+1) as $assoc)
{
foreach($this->getPermutations($assoc) as $ordered)
{
$ordered = join(' ', $ordered);
$result = call_user_func_array($checker, array_merge([$ordered, $search], $args));
if($result<=$this->distance)
{
return $return?$ordered:true;
}
}
}
return $return?null:false;
}
This will check on similarity, based on user callback, which must accept at least two parameters (i.e. compared strings). Also you may wish to return string which triggered callback positive return. Please, note, that this code will not differ upper and lower case - but may be you do not want such behavior (then just replace strtolower()).
Sample of full code is available in this listing (I didn't used sandbox since I'm not sure about how long code listing will be available there). With this sample of usage:
$data = 'Niels Faurskov Andersen';
$search = [
'Niels Andersen',
'Niels Faurskov',
'Niels Faurskov Andersen',
'Nils Faurskov Andersen',
'Nils Andersen',
'niels faurskov',
'niels Faurskov',
'niffddels Faurskovffre'//I've added this crap
];
$checker = new Similarity($data, 2);
echo(sprintf('Testing "%s"'.PHP_EOL.PHP_EOL, $data));
foreach($search as $name)
{
echo(sprintf(
'Name "%s" has %s'.PHP_EOL,
$name,
($result=$checker->checkMatch($name, 'levenshtein', [], 1))
?sprintf('matched with "%s"', $result)
:'mismatched'
)
);
}
you'll get result like:
Testing "Niels Faurskov Andersen"
Name "Niels Andersen" has matched with "niels andersen"
Name "Niels Faurskov" has matched with "niels faurskov"
Name "Niels Faurskov Andersen" has matched with "niels faurskov andersen"
Name "Nils Faurskov Andersen" has matched with "niels faurskov andersen"
Name "Nils Andersen" has matched with "niels andersen"
Name "niels faurskov" has matched with "niels faurskov"
Name "niels Faurskov" has matched with "niels faurskov"
Name "niffddels Faurskovffre" has mismatched
-here is demo for this code, just in case.
Complexity
Since you're caring about not just any methods, but also about - how good is it, you may notice, that such code will produce quite excessive operations. I mean, at least, generation of string parts. Complexity here consists of two parts:
- Strings parts generation part. If you want to generate all string parts - you'll have to do this like I've described above. Possible point to improve - generation of unordered string sets (that comes before permutation). But still I doubt it can be done because method in provided code will generate them not with "brute-force", but as they are mathematically calculated (with cardinality of
)
- Similarity checking part. Here your complexity depends of given similarity checker. For example,
similar_text() has O(N3) complexity, thus with large comparison sets it will be extremely slow.
But you still may improve current solution with checking on the fly. Now this code will first generate all string sub-sequences and then start checking them one by one. In common case you don't need to do that, so you may want to replace that with behavior, when after generating next sequence it will be checked immediately. Then you'll increase performance for strings which have positive answer (but not for those which have no match).
