import javax.persistence.*;
simple POJO
class A {
@Transient
protected transient someClass X;
}
Despite this, in the database, I still see it persisted? Any idea of this weird behavior?
Asked
Active
Viewed 181 times
0
Svetlin Zarev
- 14,713
- 4
- 53
- 82
rhozet
- 542
- 1
- 6
- 17
-
you sure using javax.persistence.Transient ? – Abhishek Nayak Feb 10 '14 at 06:02
-
yeah.. javax.persistence.Transient \n Howeever I haven't adde @transient to getter/setter methods... – rhozet Feb 10 '14 at 06:04
-
Ooh my goodness, it needs to be added at getter/setters also/... – rhozet Feb 10 '14 at 06:06
-
no it doesn't :) You should annotate ether the fields `or` the accessors. – Svetlin Zarev Feb 10 '14 at 06:13
-
I dont see the entity annotation is part of embedded object ? – Koitoer Feb 10 '14 at 06:17
-
A is and Entity or Embeddable ? – Koitoer Feb 10 '14 at 06:22
1 Answers
0
It is because you mixed annotating both fields and getters. According to the JPA spec, you must remain consistent, in which you JPA annotate either only the fields, or only the getters. (usually JPA looks at the ID field and than decides to consider the fields or getters).
V G
- 18,822
- 6
- 51
- 89
-
Initially i had added annotaion only for field. It didnt work . If you see I have also made filed java transient. But it didnt work. When I added to getter/setters it worked..(i.e not got persisted.).Do you think getter/setters are more important than field for transient annotaion?? – rhozet Feb 10 '14 at 09:29
-
See these questions http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4188048/why-should-anybody-put-annotations-on-the-getters-or-setters-when-using-jpa-to-m http://stackoverflow.com/questions/594597/hibernate-annotations-which-is-better-field-or-property-access http://stackoverflow.com/questions/942035/hibernate-jpa-annotating-bean-methods-vs-fields – V G Feb 10 '14 at 09:32
-