1

I have a repository on GitHub with a master branch and a gh-pages branch. To make changes, I have been branching off the master, making a series of commits, and then merging them into the master when I am satisfied with the changes. The gh-pages branch corresponds to a website that demos the project. After the changes have been merged into master, I merge them into gh-pages and update the index.html accordingly.

This current workflow has been fine up until now, but I am now trying to keep the master and gh-pages branches cleaner. For instance, when I merge master onto gh-pages to update the css file, I don't want the CONTRIBUTING.md file to also be carried over to that branch. It only belongs on the master branch. Similarly, if I am to merge changes to index.html from gh-pages to master, I don't want the CNAME file, for example, to be carried over.

Essentially, I have two branches on which contain a number of files that I would like to keep in sync, but also respectively contain files that are exclusively their own. Is there a better workflow that I could be using to keep these main files in sync while maintaining their distinct files?


Edit: This question asked another way would be: how do open source projects like Bootstrap and React keep the source code (lib,dist,etc.) synced across branches while other files only appear (and are maintained) in one or the other?

jbranchaud
  • 5,909
  • 9
  • 45
  • 70
  • possible duplicate of [Syncing two GIT branches that only differ by a couple of files](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2461224/syncing-two-git-branches-that-only-differ-by-a-couple-of-files) – random Jul 26 '14 at 04:29

0 Answers0