The axes handles that subplots
returns vary according to the number of subplots requested:
- for (1x1) you get a single handle,
- for (n x 1 or 1 x n) you get a 1d array of handles,
- for (m x n) you get a 2d array of handles.
It appears that your problem arises from the change in interface from the 2nd to 3rd cases (i.e. 1d to 2d axis array). The following snippets can help if you don't know ahead of time what the array shape will be.
I have found numpy's unravel_index
useful for iterating over the axes, e.g.:
ncol = 3 # pick one dimension
nrow = (len(accountList)+ ncol-1) / ncol # make sure enough subplots
fig, ax = plt.subplots(nrows=nrow, ncols=ncol) # create the axes
for i in xrange(len(accountList)): # go over a linear list of data
ix = np.unravel_index(i, ax.shape) # compute an appropriate index (1d or 2d)
accountList[i].plot( ..., ax=ax[ix]) # pandas method plot
ax[ix].plot(...) # or direct axis object method plot (/scatter/bar/...)
You can also reshape the returned array so that it is linear (as I used in this answer):
for a in ax.reshape(-1):
a.plot(...)
As noted in the linked solution, axs needs a bit of massaging if you might have 1x1 subplots (and then receive a single axes handle; axs = np.array(axs)
is enough).
And after reading the docs more carefully (oops), setting squeeze=False
forces subplots
to return a 2d matrix regardless of the choices of ncols/nrows. (squeeze
defaults to True).
If you do this, you can either iterate over two dimensions (if it is natural for your data), or use either of the above approaches to iterate over your data linearly and computing a 2d index into ax
.