As static variable declaration without any value assigned goes in BSS section of code. where it will be automatically initialed to zero.
Question: suppose, if declare static pointer without any assignment, then whether should it have zero value for address or value?
In C a static pointer will be initialized to null, the draft C99 standard section 6.7.8 Initialization paragraph 10 says:
an object that has static storage duration is not initialized explicitly, then:
and included the following bullet:
— if it has pointer type, it is initialized to a null pointer;
So no storage is allocated for it, it is a null pointer. Also note it is an implementation defined behavior where static variables are stored.
The relevant section for the C++ draft standard would be section 8.5 Initializers paragraph 13 which says (emphasis mine):
If no initializer is specified for an object, the object is default-initialized; if no initialization is performed, an object with automatic or dynamic storage duration has indeterminate value. [ Note: Objects with static or thread storage duration are zero-initialized, see 3.6.2. —end note ]
zero-initialize is covered in paragraph 6 which says:
To zero-initialize an object or reference of type T means:
and has the following bullet:
— if T is a scalar type (3.9), the object is set to the value 0 (zero), taken as an integral constant expression, converted to T;103
where footnote 103 says (emphasis mine):
As specified in 4.10, converting an integral constant expression whose value is 0 to a pointer type results in a null pointer value.
The pointer will point to address zero (NULL on most systems). You will still need to point it somewhere valid (e. g. from malloc) before using it as a pointer.
