I wouldn't try to learn an IDE at the same time as learning a language. An easier transition would be to stick to your shell and habitual text editor, and use the following shell-friendly tools:
- ant, for organising your project, running automated test suites, incremental compiles
- BeanShell for interactive testing, trying things out quickly
- A quick trick:
javap from the commandline will give method signatures for any class in the standard library. Similar to php -r but gives more information since Java is typed.
The online documentation for Java is precise, professional, and consistent in tone and format. Unlike in PHP where all of the functions are in one flat namespace, the standard libraries in Java are class hierarchies. You've got to know your way around that standard library, which means knowing hierarchies + responsibilities: for example you've got to know that java.util.List is a subinterface of java.util.Collection with the addition of a concept of ordered entries. With that information in your head, a google search for java.util.List will take you to the Javadoc for the class, and the Javadoc will tell you exact method signatures and link you to a selection of concrete implementations.
Some miscellaneous distinctions:
- Strings are sequences of characters rather than sequences of bytes. Absolutely the right way of doing it.
- Systems produce and consume streams (of bytes or characters) rather than byte buffers. For example, if you wanted to filter the output in PHP, a standard practice is to ask ob_get_contents for a byte buffer then to transform the whole buffer. In Java, you add a filter to your servlet that transforms the output a byte or a character at a time. It's a bit imposing to work with initially but it's simpler and more Lego-like when you get used to it - your stream processor doesn't have to know where things come from and where they go.
- Almost everything useful is an interface, and creating an instance of an interface can be tricky, non-standardised, and not always well-documented. In PHP, you can get up and running with XML with
new DOMDocument(). In Java, org.w3c.dom.Document is an interface, so new() won't work. Javadoc is very precise about how interface instances behave once they come into existence, but it can be quite coy and prudish when you're trying to find out how an object is actually born. Very often, you'll have to look for tutorials and code examples and copy-paste a piece of boilerplate that gives you an instance of DOMDocument or java.sql.Connection or whatever. One reason frameworks like Spring are popular is that they separate out the ugly object-creation code and present you with a world where interface implementations are just magically there.
I actually switched in the opposite direction. I found that Java works very well in a large company where you might be working on a single component, handing it off to someone else who integrates that component into a larger system, which is then packaged and handed off to a separate operations team - that's where all this indirection and configurability (FactoryBuilderFactory type abstractions, web.xml files, etc) makes sense and does something useful. In a small company where the programmers are the ops personnel, Java is a lot more work. With Java, you'll have to get used to concepts like starting up the Java process, monitoring the Java process to make sure it stays up, monitoring the Java process to make sure that it doesn't go into a coma where it's alive but not responding, shutting down and restarting the Java process with minimal disruption when you're updating code, etc, etc. If you have separate ops personnel, that's fine, it's their job, they're very good at it. If you're a programmer, babysitting a Java process can be distracting and difficult to do well.
