I just finished a tetris clone using SDL 1.2, now I'm trying to make a better version using SDL2. But I'm getting segmentation fault and I don't know why.
Here's the valgrind report:
==9471== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==9471== Copyright (C) 2002-2013, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==9471== Using Valgrind-3.9.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==9471== Command: ./tetris
==9471==
==9471== Thread 2:
==9471== Invalid read of size 8
==9471== at 0xB4B57A9: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/nvidia/current/libGL.so.319.82)
==9471== by 0x4E8094E: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libSDL2-2.0.so.0.1.0)
==9471== by 0x4E799EA: SDL_CreateTexture (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libSDL2-2.0.so.0.1.0)
==9471== by 0x4E79C6D: SDL_CreateTextureFromSurface (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libSDL2-2.0.so.0.1.0)
==9471== by 0x401176: load_texture.3137.2439
==9471== by 0x401194: video_load_image.2436
==9471== by 0x4011B6: block_image_load_all.2429
==9471== by 0x4017BD: run_game_logic.2384
==9471== by 0x541B061: start_thread (pthread_create.c:312)
==9471== by 0x5715A3C: clone (clone.S:111)
==9471== Address 0x8c0 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
==9471==
==9471==
==9471== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
==9471== Access not within mapped region at address 0x8C0
==9471== at 0xB4B57A9: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/nvidia/current/libGL.so.319.82)
==9471== by 0x4E8094E: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libSDL2-2.0.so.0.1.0)
==9471== by 0x4E799EA: SDL_CreateTexture (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libSDL2-2.0.so.0.1.0)
==9471== by 0x4E79C6D: SDL_CreateTextureFromSurface (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libSDL2-2.0.so.0.1.0)
==9471== by 0x401176: load_texture.3137.2439
==9471== by 0x401194: video_load_image.2436
==9471== by 0x4011B6: block_image_load_all.2429
==9471== by 0x4017BD: run_game_logic.2384
==9471== by 0x541B061: start_thread (pthread_create.c:312)
==9471== by 0x5715A3C: clone (clone.S:111)
==9471== If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
==9471== overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
==9471== possible), you can try to increase the size of the
==9471== main thread stack using the --main-stacksize= flag.
==9471== The main thread stack size used in this run was 8388608.
And the functions:
SDL_Texture *video_load_image(const char *file)
{
return load_texture(file);
}
static SDL_Texture *load_texture(const char *path)
{
SDL_Surface *surface;
SDL_Texture *texture;
if((surface = SDL_LoadBMP(path)) == NULL){
puts("invalid path");
return NULL;
}
texture = SDL_CreateTextureFromSurface(renderer, surface);
SDL_FreeSurface(surface);
return texture;
}
char *image_path[BLOCK_COUNT] = {
"img/block_dark_cyan32.bmp", "img/block_dark_red32.bmp",
"img/block_dark_brown32.bmp", "img/block_dark_magenta32.bmp",
"img/block_dark_gray32.bmp", "img/block_dark_green32.bmp",
"img/block_dark_blue32.bmp",
"img/block_wall32.bmp", "img/block_empty32.bmp"
};
SDL_Texture *textures[BLOCK_COUNT];
int block_image_load_all(void)
{
for(int i = 0; i < BLOCK_COUNT; ++i){
if((textures[i] = video_load_image(image_path[i])) == NULL){
while(i > 0)
video_free_image(textures[--i]);
return ERROR;
}
}
return SUCCESS;
}
What is causing segmentation fault here?
Update: switching the renderer to SDL_RENDERER_SOFTWARE
solves the problem, but I would like to use SDL_RENDERER_ACCELERATED
I don't think the problem is the driver since I'm using SDL_RENDERER_ACCELERATED
successfully in another program.