Is it possible to get the actual millis since I-don't-know in a C++-programm like System.currentTimeMillis()
in Java? I know time()
, but I think it's not exactly enough to measure short times, is it?
Asked
Active
Viewed 1.4k times
5

László Papp
- 51,870
- 39
- 111
- 135

PEAR
- 685
- 3
- 10
- 20
-
Take a look at these questions: [how to get time in millis in c++ just like java](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2831841/how-to-get-time-in-millis-in-c-just-like-java) and [C++ Timer function to provide time in nano seconds](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/275004/c-timer-function-to-provide-time-in-nano-seconds) – manlio Apr 05 '14 at 10:39
-
@slugonamission: that is *nix specific... – László Papp Apr 05 '14 at 10:41
-
@LaszloPapp - oops, deleted. – slugonamission Apr 05 '14 at 10:44
3 Answers
3
In C++ you also have clock()
#include <time.h>
...
clock_t start = clock();
... some processing ...
clock_t stop = clock();
double elapsed = double(stop - start) / CLOCKS_PER_SEC;
There are also other more accurate ways of measure timings, but they are more dependent on which king of system you're running your programs on.

6502
- 112,025
- 15
- 165
- 265
-
-
3The `clock` function returns CPU time. I get the impression this is asking about wall time. – David Schwartz Apr 05 '14 at 10:44
-
1
-
-
@PEAR: the value of the constant `CLOCKS_PER_SEC` is system dependent and the same goes for the provided accuracy (they are not required to be aligned; e.g. `CLOCKS_PER_SEC` could be 100000 but the accuracy just 20ms). – 6502 Apr 06 '14 at 11:46
3
It's part of the language standard these days (some years now):
See it Live On Coliru
#include <chrono>
#include <iostream>
int main()
{
using namespace std::chrono;
auto epoch = high_resolution_clock::from_time_t(0);
// ...
auto now = high_resolution_clock::now();
auto mseconds = duration_cast<milliseconds>(now - epoch).count();
std::cout << "millis: " << mseconds;
}

sehe
- 374,641
- 47
- 450
- 633
-
+1 This is how I would do it in C++. Note: `using namespace std::chrono;` seems very worth it here. – smoothware Apr 05 '14 at 10:41
-
-
Although [even MSVC, the compiler-that-always-lags-behing, had `
` in VS2012](http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh567368(v=vs.110).aspx) – sehe Apr 05 '14 at 10:59 -
@LaszloPapp *This will not work without C++11 support* -- there no point to consider outdated standards, unless you're dealing with legacy code. – Walter Apr 05 '14 at 11:56
-
@Walter: clearly, you have not worked much with embedded. I understand bleeding edge desktop people hardly see out of their box, but that is just a specific domain. To be fair, even on desktop there are plenty of VS2010 and VS2008 users, not to mention Windows CE, etc. – László Papp Apr 05 '14 at 11:57
-
2Okay, time to calm down people. It's all useful information. No need to imply incompetence left or right – sehe Apr 05 '14 at 12:01
-
@LaszloPapp: And let's not forget corporate world, the migration from gcc 3.4 to gcc 4.3 is still ongoing where I work (has been for the last 7 years)... – Matthieu M. Apr 05 '14 at 14:00
-
-
should the code say auto epoch = system_clock::from_time_t(0); ? My code wouldn't compile with high_resolution_clock::from_time_t(0); – Tad Sep 29 '14 at 14:43
-
@Tad your compiler might not be to update/have full support for std::chrono (yet): http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/chrono/high_resolution_clock. Depending on the resolution you desire, `system_clock` could be fine for your purposes – sehe Sep 29 '14 at 14:44
-
I used this code and time calculated was 1412002099144 miliseconds. Is time 0 in 1970? Why not use system_clock::now()? I am using gcc 4.9 – Tad Sep 29 '14 at 14:54
-
@Tad look at the question for context. Heck, here's a link for you http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/lang/System.html#currentTimeMillis() – sehe Sep 29 '14 at 14:56
1
If you have C++11 support available, you may want to look into std::chrono
.
#include <iostream>
#include <chrono>
#include <ctime>
long fibonacci(int n)
{
if (n < 3) return 1;
return fibonacci(n-1) + fibonacci(n-2);
}
int main()
{
std::chrono::time_point<std::chrono::system_clock> start, end;
start = std::chrono::system_clock::now();
std::cout << "f(42) = " << fibonacci(42) << '\n';
end = std::chrono::system_clock::now();
std::chrono::duration<double> elapsed_seconds = end-start;
std::time_t end_time = std::chrono::system_clock::to_time_t(end);
std::cout << "finished computation at " << std::ctime(&end_time)
<< "elapsed time: " << elapsed_seconds.count() << "s\n";
}
Failing that, you could use the C style std::time as follows:
#include <ctime>
#include <iostream>
int main()
{
std::time_t result = std::time(NULL);
std::cout << std::asctime(std::localtime(&result))
<< result << " seconds since the Epoch\n";
}

László Papp
- 51,870
- 39
- 111
- 135
-
-
@sehe: read about System.currentTimeMillis in the original question, please. This may be [a good starting point](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17271039/does-system-currenttimemillis-return-utc-time). – László Papp Apr 05 '14 at 10:46