I was expecting to see the same results between these two runs, and they are different. Makes me question if I really understand what how the dplyr code is working (I have read pretty much everything I can find about dplyr in the package and online). Can anyone explain why the results are different, or how to obtain similar results?
library(dplyr)
x <- iris
x <- x %.%
group_by(Species, Sepal.Width) %.%
summarise (freq=n()) %.%
summarise (mean_by_group = mean(Sepal.Width))
print(x)
x <- iris
x <- tapply(x$Sepal.Width, x$Species, mean)
print(x)
Update: I don't think this is the most efficient way to do this, but the following code gives a result that matches the tapply approach. Per Hadley's suggestion, I scrutinized the results line by line, and this is the best I could come up with using dplyr
library(dplyr)
x <- iris
x <- x %.%
group_by(Species, Sepal.Width) %.%
summarise (freq=n()) %.%
mutate (mean_by_group = sum(Sepal.Width*freq)/sum(freq)) %.%
print(x)
Update: for some reason I thought I had to group all variables I wanted to analyse, which is what sent things in the wrong direction. This is all I needed, which is closer to the examples in the package.
x <- iris %.%
group_by(Species) %.%
summarise(Sepal.Width = mean(Sepal.Width))
print(x)