Emacs' Bookmarks are great, as is navigating the list of buffers. But I find it nice to have shorter chords to get directly to where I want to go. So I have been accruing a repetitive set of functions and keybindings for all my favorite files and folders.
I wondered if I could use a dolist
to handle this repetitiveness, but am no good programmer.
Here is one of the (seven and rising) repetitively defined functions, and a feeble attempt at writing the dolist
following:
(defun jump-to-main ()
(interactive)
(find-file main))
(global-set-key (kbd "C-c m") 'jump-to-main)
This might barely qualify as pseudocode:
(dolist (x '(("m" main)
("t" tech))
(defun (concat 'jump-to- (cdr x)) ()
(interactive)
(find-file (cdr x)))
(global-set-key (kbd (concat "C-c " (car x)))
'(concat 'jump-to- (cdr x)))
))
The payoff in an elegant init file, versus how fast I am at solving at Lisp problems... hoping the Stackoverflow can save me.
Other strategies and approaches are appreciated.
EDIT:
With lawlist's suggestion, my question may reduce and be more clear presented the following way. I would like to reduce the repetition in the following series of keybindings.
(global-set-key (kbd "C-c A")
(lambda ()
(interactive)
(find-file fileA)))
(global-set-key (kbd "C-c B")
(lambda ()
(interactive)
(find-file fileB)))
...
(global-set-key (kbd "C-c Z")
(lambda ()
(interactive)
(find-file fileZ)))
fileK
for example expands to something like "~/fileK.txt"
.
EDIT:
So here is another try:
(dolist (x '(("m" main)
("t" tech))
(global-set-key (kbd (concat "C-c " (car x)))
(lambda ()
(interactive)
(find-file (cdr x))
))))
The keybinding part seems okay, but (find-file (cdr x))
isn't doing what I need, and I couldn't fix it in a small amount of googling lisp.
Here are the expressions I'm using to focus on the broken parts:
(setq somefile "~/somefile.txt")
(setq x '("s" . somefile))
(concat "C-c " (car x))
(find-file (cdr x))
The last line is the one that doesn't work, as (cdr x)
apparently evaluates to (main)
. I tried slipping in an eval
to expand the main
variable, but it doesn't seem...
Reading Phil's answer now, this may take me a while.